TiLE (Time Lapse Eeva) Clinical Trial (TiLE)

January 29, 2020 updated by: Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany

A Phase IV, Prospective, Randomized, Exploratory, Multicenter, Eeva™ Trial (Time Lapse Eeva - TiLE)

The purpose of the study was to explore the added value of adjunctive use of Early Embryo Viability Assessment (Eeva) with morphological grading in identifying optimal embryos for transfer.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

This study is a Phase IV, open label, prospective, randomized, exploratory, multicenter study. Subjects were randomized in 2:1 ratio to two treatment groups: in the experimental group, embryos were assessed for embryo transfer (ET) with Eeva and morphological grading, while in the control group embryos were assessed with morphological grading only.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

976

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Toronto, Canada
        • Mount Sinai Hospital
    • Alberta
      • Calgary, Alberta, Canada
        • Cambrian Wellness Centre
    • Ontario
      • Burlington, Ontario, Canada
        • ONE Fertility
      • Mississauga, Ontario, Canada
        • ISIS Regional Fertility Clinic
      • Copenhagen, Denmark
        • Rigshospitalet
      • Lille Cedex, France
        • CHRU - Hopital Jeanne de Flandres
      • Marseille, France
        • Laboratoire Alphabio & Institut de Médecine de la Reproducti
      • Nantes, France
        • Hôpital Hotel Dieu
      • Luebeck, Germany
        • Universitätsklinik Schleswig-Holstein
      • Munich, Germany
        • Kinderwunsch Centrum München
      • Wiesbaden, Germany
        • MVZ Kinderwunschzentrum Wiesbaden GmbH
      • Montichiari, Italy
        • Montichiari Università degli studi di Bresca
      • Rozzano, Italy
        • Istituto Clinico Humanitas
      • Torino, Italy
        • Università degli Studi Torino
      • Viareggio, Italy
        • Ospedale Versilia
      • Skien, Norway
        • Telemark hospital Porsgrunn
      • Alicante, Spain
        • Clinica Vistahermosa
      • Barcelona, Spain
        • Clínica Sagrada Familia
      • Granada, Spain
        • Hospital Universitario Virgen de las Nieves
      • Stockholm, Sweden
        • Fertilitetscentrum Stockholm
      • Cambridge, United Kingdom
        • Bourn Hall
      • Edgbaston, United Kingdom
        • Birmingham Women's Health Care NHS Trust
      • London, United Kingdom
        • Homerton University Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 40 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • All infertile subjects treated with In vitro fertilization (IVF)/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI)
  • Subject age less than or equal to (<=) 40 years
  • Less than or equal to (<=) 3 failed IVF/ICSI cycles
  • At least 4 normally fertilized eggs (2 pronuclei [2PN]) in current cycle
  • Normal uterine cavity
  • Fertilization using only ejaculated sperm (fresh or frozen)
  • Subject must have read and signed the Informed Consent Form

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Have clinically significant systemic disease
  • Have abnormal, undiagnosed gynecological bleeding
  • Have any contraindication to Controlled Ovarian Stimulation (COS) for assisted reproductive technologies (ART) and to gonadotropins to be used in ART
  • Egg donor cycle
  • Planned "freeze all" cycle (oocytes or embryos)
  • Concurrent participation in another clinical trial

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Early Embryo Viability Assessment + Morphological Grading
Embryos of subjects randomized in this group were assessed using Early Embryo Viability Assessment (Eeva) System and morphological grading to identify optimal embryos for transfer.
Embryos of subjects randomized in this group were assessed using Eeva System and morphological grading to identify optimal embryos for transfer.
No Intervention: Morphological Grading
Embryos of subjects randomized in this group were assessed only using morphological grading to identify optimal embryos for transfer.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Implantation Rate
Time Frame: Gestational Weeks 5 to 8
Implantation rate was calculated by dividing the number of intrauterine gestational sacs by the number of embryos transferred multiplied by 100.
Gestational Weeks 5 to 8

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Clinical Pregnancy Rate
Time Frame: Gestational Weeks 5 to 8
Clinical pregnancy was confirmed by the presence of a gestational sac with heartbeat as assessed by ultrasonography. Clinical pregnancy rate was measured as the number of clinical pregnancies divided by number of embryo transfer (ET) cycles multiplied by 100.
Gestational Weeks 5 to 8
Number of Subjects With Ongoing Pregnancy Status
Time Frame: Gestational Weeks 10 to 12
Ongoing pregnancy was defined as having a positive fetal heart beat (FHB) as assessed by ultrasonography at gestational week 10-12. Number of subjects with ongoing pregnancy status has been reported, where "Yes" indicates participants with positive ongoing pregnancy status and "No" indicates participants with negative ongoing pregnancy status .
Gestational Weeks 10 to 12
Multiple Pregnancy Rate
Time Frame: Gestational Weeks 5 to 8
Multiple pregnancy rate was defined as a clinical pregnancy with greater than equals to (>=) 2 fetal sacs as assessed by ultrasonography. Multiple Pregnancies rate was measured by number of multiple pregnancies divided by number of embryo transfer cycles multiplied by 100.
Gestational Weeks 5 to 8
Utilization Rate
Time Frame: Day 3 or Day 5/6 of embryo culture
Utilization rate was defined as the sum of number of transferred and frozen embryos divided by number of normally fertilized oocytes multiplied by 100.
Day 3 or Day 5/6 of embryo culture
Spontaneous Miscarriage Rate
Time Frame: Gestational Weeks 10 to 12
Spontaneous miscarriage rate was measured by the number of spontaneous miscarriages as communicated during medical appointment or by telephone contact divided by number of clinical pregnancies multiplied by 100.
Gestational Weeks 10 to 12

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Eeva Conformity in Early Embryo Viability Assessment + Morphological Grading Group for Day 3 Embryo Transfer (ET)
Time Frame: Day 3 of embryo culture
Eeva Conformity was reported as the number of subjects who were compliant to use Eeva in embryo assessment in the "Early Embryo Viability Assessment + morphological grading" group. Eeva-compliance subgroup refers to subjects whose embryos were assessed by embryologists following the recommendation of Eeva system and the instructions for use (IFU) of Eeva. Subgroup analysis revealed a high incidence of Eeva noncompliance in the experimental group, which compromised the quality of this study. Only "Early Embryo Viability Assessment + Morphological Grading" reporting arm was applicable for this outcome measure.
Day 3 of embryo culture
Eeva Conformity in Early Embryo Viability Assessment + Morphological Grading Group for Day 5/6 Embryo Transfer (ET)
Time Frame: Day 5/6 of embryo culture
Eeva Conformity was reported as the number of subjects who were compliant to use Eeva in embryo assessment in the "Early Embryo Viability Assessment + morphological grading" group. Eeva-compliance subgroup refers to subjects whose embryos were assessed by embryologists following the recommendation of Eeva system and the IFU of Eeva. Subgroup analysis revealed a high incidence of Eeva noncompliance in the experimental group, which compromised the quality of this study. Only "Early Embryo Viability Assessment + Morphological Grading" reporting arm was applicable for this outcome measure.
Day 5/6 of embryo culture

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 29, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 9, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

February 9, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 10, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 10, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

April 15, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 30, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 29, 2020

Last Verified

January 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • EMR700623_545

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Fertility

Clinical Trials on Eeva

3
Subscribe