Post-Embolic Rhythm Detection With Implantable Versus External Monitoring (PERDIEM)

August 21, 2023 updated by: University of Alberta

Post-Embolic Rhythm Detection With Implantable Versus External Monitoring: Pilot and Feasibility Study

The overall aim of this trial is to determine the most cost effective approach to diagnose paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF) following transient ischemic attack (TIA) and stroke.

A summary of the rationale for this study is as follows:

  1. Recently completed randomized trials of cardiac monitoring following stroke have established that PAF is more common than previously recognized in cryptogenic stroke.
  2. The majority of TIA/stroke patients will have at least one potential stroke mechanism identified by the time etiologic investigations completed.
  3. Detecting PAF in patients with strokes with known causes (eg. lacunar and large vessel atherosclerosis) is clinically important since appropriate anticoagulation for AF reduces stroke recurrence in all patients with prior TIA/stroke not just cryptogenic strokes.
  4. There are competing technologies for evaluating cardiac rhythm and diagnosing AF but no cost effectiveness data
  5. The rates of PAF in strokes with known causes (SKC) have not been well characterized.

PER-DIEM is a pilot study to compare two different cardiac monitoring technologies as first-line investigations to detect PAF in patients with recent stroke and TIA. The study will also assess whether a pivotal trial is feasible and warranted.

The principal research questions to be addressed in this study will be:

  1. Whether implantable loop recorder (ILR) plus remote monitoring will diagnose more paroxysmal AF / atrial flutter and provide a better assessment of the total burden of AF resulting in a greater proportion of patients started on an OAC versus the external loop recorder (ELR) strategy.
  2. What is the relative cost-effectiveness as a first-line investigation of long-term implantable ECG (ILR) coupled with remote monitoring for 12 months compared to external event-triggered ECG loop recorder (ELR) for 30 days in the diagnosis clinically actionable AF in following TIA/stroke.

2) What is the feasibility, patient compliance, diagnostic accuracy and rates of AF detection (>30 seconds) of ILR compared to the ELR strategies.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

300

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Alberta
      • Calgary, Alberta, Canada, T2N 2T9
        • Foothills Medical Centre
      • Edmonton, Alberta, Canada, T6G 2B7
        • University of Alberta Hospital
      • Edmonton, Alberta, Canada, T6L5X8
        • Grey Nuns Community Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosis of the index event* made by a stroke specialist of an acute ischemic stroke or TIA occurring within the previous 90 days. The event must be either:

    1. an arterial ischemic stroke confirmed by neuroimaging; or
    2. transient ischemic attack with diffusion weighted positive lesion on MRI
  • At least one 12-lead ECG has already been obtained as part of the routine clinical post-stroke/TIA work-up, and no ECGs have shown any episodes of atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter
  • The patient is being actively investigated for the etiology of the stroke/TIA event and additional cardiac monitoring is desired to screen further for the possibility of occult paroxysmal atrial fibrillation/flutter
  • Age 18 years or older
  • Informed consent from the patient
  • The patient is expected to survive at least 6 months.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Any previously documented atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter, i.e. a past history of atrial fibrillation/flutter or atrial fibrillation/flutter detected on ECG, Holter, or telemetry following the index stroke/TIA event (a remote history of transient perioperative atrial fibrillation is not exclusionary)
  • Planned carotid endarterectomy or carotid artery stenting within 90 days
  • Any condition for which there is already an indication for long term anticoagulation Pacemaker or implantable cardioverter defibrillator device
  • Work-up for stroke that has already included extended (>48 hour) external ECG (excluding telemetry)
  • Stroke and/or comorbid illness will prevent completion of planned follow-up assessments

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Implanted Loop Recorder
long-term implantable ECG (Medtronic Reveal LINQ) coupled with remote monitoring (MyCareLink) for 12 months
Experimental: External Loop Recorder
external event-triggered ECG loop recorder (Sorin Spiderflash-t) for 30 days

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Definite AF or Highly Probable AF
Time Frame: 12 months
Definite AF or highly probable AF (adjudicated new AF lasting ≥2 minutes within 12 months of randomization)
12 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
AF Lasting ≥2 Min or Death by 12 Months
Time Frame: 12 months
Detection of atrial fibrillation lasting ≥ 2 minutes or death by 12 months.
12 months
TIA
Time Frame: 12 months
Transient ischemic attack.
12 months
Recurrent Stroke
Time Frame: 12 months
Recurrent ischemic stroke.
12 months
Hemorrhage
Time Frame: 12 months
Intracerebral hemorrhage.
12 months
Death
Time Frame: 12 months
Participant death.
12 months
Oral Anticoagulation Therapy
Time Frame: 12 months
Initiation of oral anticoagulation therapy in patients with definite AF.
12 months
≥1 Serious Adverse Event
Time Frame: 12 months
Patients with ≥1 serious adverse event.
12 months
Compliance
Time Frame: 12 months
Compliance with assigned therapy (accept ILR, conduct at least 80% of ELR assessments)
12 months
Costs of Cardiac and Non-cardiac Investigations
Time Frame: 12 months
Costs for all cardiac and non-cardiac investigations related to etiologic workup of index stroke / TIA.
12 months
Duration of Any Detected Atrial Fibrillation / Atrial Flutter.
Time Frame: 12 months
Total duration of any detected atrial fibrillation / atrial flutter.
12 months

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Predictors of AF Detection
Time Frame: 12 months
Association between baseline clinical characteristics (e.g. comorbidities, burden of supraventricular ectopy on Holter, left atrial dimension) and subsequent detection of AF
12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Brian H Buck, MD, MSc, University of Alberta

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 23, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 23, 2015

First Posted (Estimated)

April 28, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 12, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 21, 2023

Last Verified

October 1, 2021

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Stroke

Clinical Trials on Medtronic Reveal LINQ

3
Subscribe