Feasibility of Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Rectal Cancer (SentiRect)

June 15, 2022 updated by: Chris Cunningham, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust
This study will assess whether the Sienna+/Sentimag system, which involves a magnetic tracer, is effective in identifying the sentinel lymph node in rectal cancer and whether it is then feasible to remove this lymph node during surgery to locally excise early rectal cancer.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

One issue in managing rectal cancer is identifying which patients will benefit from less radical surgery, which is much safer and better tolerated. However it does not remove lymph nodes where cancer cells may have spread. If lymph nodes containing cancer are left behind, the cancer may recur. So this surgery is only suitable in early rectal cancers not involving lymph nodes. Unfortunately, current investigations do not always accurately identify involved lymph nodes.

Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is a technique to surgically remove the first lymph node where cancer cells spread. If this lymph node contains cancer, radical surgery is needed to reduce the risk of recurrence. However if it is clear, less radical surgery should be sufficient. This is standard practice for breast cancer and avoids unnecessary major surgery in many patients.

The investigators aim to assess whether SLNB is useful in rectal cancer. The investigators will determine whether the Sienna+/Sentimag system effectively identifies the sentinel lymph node, and whether the node can then be removed surgically.

The investigators will recruit patients in Oxford hospitals about to undergo surgery for rectal cancer. Patients will receive an injection of magnetic tracer during endoscopy prior to surgery. Some patients will have an extra MRI scan. During or after surgery, depending on the type of operation planned, a magnetic probe will be used to locate the sentinel lymph node in the tissue around the rectum. The removed specimen will be examined by a pathologist. Funding to undertake this study has been granted by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR). Endomagnetics, the manufacturer, will supply the magnetic tracer and probe for use in this study.

If successful, the investigators will plan a larger clinical trial. This could have a major impact on improving outcomes for patients by allowing less radical surgery to be used where it is most appropriate.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

15

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 90 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • diagnosed with operable rectal cancer
  • case discussed at Oxford Colorectal Cancer multi-disciplinary team (MDT) meeting
  • willing and able to give informed consent
  • willing and able to comply with all trial requirements, in the investigator's opinion

Exclusion Criteria:

  • females who are pregnant or lactating
  • known intolerance or hypersensitivity to iron, dextran compounds, magnetic tracers or superparamagnetic iron oxide particles (SPIO)
  • cancer involvement of anal sphincter complex
  • adults who are not able to give consent or are deemed vulnerable

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: DIAGNOSTIC
  • Allocation: NON_RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Ex-vivo
Patients with relatively advanced rectal cancer who are scheduled to undergo radical surgery to excise rectal tumour and mesorectum. They will receive endoscopic Sienna+ injection (magnetic tracer) 5 days before planned surgery. They will then undergo surgery to excise rectal cancer. The excised specimen will be examined using the Sentimag probe and by standard histology to assess for lymph nodes ex-vivo.
Endoscopic injection of magnetic tracer
Surgery as scheduled according to size and stage of rectal cancer. This will be either radical surgery or transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM)
Probe to detect the previously injected magnetic tracer (Sienna+)
Experimental: In-vivo
Patients with early rectal cancer scheduled to undergo local excision of a rectal tumour by transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM). They will receive endoscopic Sienna+ injection (magnetic tracer) 5 days before planned surgery, and have an MRI scan to assess tracer spread. They will then undergo TEM surgery to excise the rectal cancer. During surgery the Sentimag probe will be used to locate the sentinel lymph node so it can be surgically removed. The excised specimen will be examined by standard histology.
Endoscopic injection of magnetic tracer
Surgery as scheduled according to size and stage of rectal cancer. This will be either radical surgery or transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM)
Probe to detect the previously injected magnetic tracer (Sienna+)
MRI scan of pelvis to detect spread of magnetic tracer

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Participants Experiencing of Adverse or Hypersensitivity Reaction
Time Frame: 5 days after injection
Assess frequency of any adverse of hypersensitivity reactions to tracer after endoscopic injection
5 days after injection
Number of Operations Where Effects of Tracer Injection Can be Detected by Surgeon During Surgery
Time Frame: at time of surgery
Assess frequency of Sienna+ tracer being detectable at the tumour injection site and in the lymph nodes at the time of surgery
at time of surgery
Number of Operations Where There Was Any Surgical Difficulty Due to Tracer Injection Based on Qualitative Assessment by Surgeon
Time Frame: at time of surgery
Surgeon's qualitative assessment of any difficulties encountered during surgery which could be attributable to prior injection of the tracer, such as pigmentation or fibrosis making surgery more difficult than normal
at time of surgery

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Mesorectal Specimens Which Demonstrated Correlation Between Histopathology and Sentimag Probe Findings for Lymph Node Number and Location
Time Frame: 5 days after surgery
The histopathology findings of lymph node distribution in the excised mesorectal specimen correlated with the information provided by the Sentimag probe.
5 days after surgery
Number of Mesorectal Specimens Which Demonstrated Coincidence Between Histopathological and Sentimag Probe Identification of the 'Sentinel' Lymph Node
Time Frame: 5 days after surgery
A pathologist will identify the sentinel lymph node histologically and record whether this matches the location identified by the Sentimag probe which has been previously marked with a suture
5 days after surgery
High Resolution MRI Composite Map of Drainage Pattern of Sienna+ Tracer in Mesorectum
Time Frame: MRI scan done 2 hours after Sienna+ tracer injection
Evaluation of individual variability in Sienna+ distribution after endoscopic injection on high resolution MRI scans to establish a baseline for individual variation
MRI scan done 2 hours after Sienna+ tracer injection
Number of TEM Operations Where the Sentinel Lymph Node Can be Identified and Removed
Time Frame: at time of surgery
Sentimag probe is used to localise the sentinel node during TEM (transanal endoscopic microsurgery) and then remove it if possible
at time of surgery

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Chris Cunningham, MD FRCS, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

December 1, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 1, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 12, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

May 15, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 6, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 15, 2022

Last Verified

June 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Rectal Cancer

Clinical Trials on Sienna+ injection

3
Subscribe