Lung Ultrasound as a Predictor of Mechanical Ventilation in Neonates Older Than 32 Weeks

May 19, 2015 updated by: Hospital Sant Joan de Deu
Neonatal respiratory distress prognosis may be difficult to estimate at admission. Lung ultrasound is a useful diagnostic tool that is quick, requires little training and is radiation free. This study analyzes whether early lung ultrasound can predict respiratory failure.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Neonatal respiratory distress prognosis may be difficult to estimate at admission. Lung ultrasound is a useful diagnostic tool that is quick, requires little training and is radiation free. This study analyzes whether early lung ultrasound can predict respiratory failure.

Methods This study was conducted from January to December 2014 at Hospital Sant Joan de Déu (Esplugues de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain), a third-level hospital with 3300 births per year and a neonatal intensive care unit with annual admission of 700 patients.

Local institutional review board of Hospital Sant Joan de Déu approved the protocol (project approval number PIC-07-15) and written informed consent was obtained from all parents.

Patients older than 32 weeks admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit with respiratory distress who were not on invasive mechanical ventilation (MV) were eligible for recruitment.

A single operator, a neonatologist skilled in lung and heart sonography, performed the examinations. Images were then analysed by another neonatologist with less experience in LUS. He was blind to the perinatal history and chest radiography of the newborns and unaware of the clinical diagnosis. Infants were from a non-consecutive convenience sample recruited when the operator was available for the execution of LUS in the first 2 hours of life.

Examinations were performed with a portable device (Siemens Acuson X) using a 10MHz linear probe and previously warmed gel. Eight video clips were stored at each examination, which was performed at the patient's bedside, with the neonate placed in a supine position. In each hemithorax 4 regions were evaluated: parasternal area, anterolateral axillary area, posterior axillary area, and the fifth intercostal space, by means of a transversal scan. The LUS procedures were carried out in 1.5-2 minutes.

Infants were classified into 2 groups, according to the LUS pattern:

  • Low risk: Normal, transient tachypnea of the newborn.
  • High risk: Respiratory distress syndrome, meconium aspiration syndrome, pneumothorax, pneumonia.

A second investigator made the same classification after reading chest x-ray pictures. Respiratory failure was defined as the need for invasive mechanical ventilation during the first day of life.

A single consultant, a neonatologist expert in lung disease, also blinded to the patient's perinatal history and clinical condition, made the x-ray diagnosis.

Finally, another consultant neonatologist made the final clinical diagnosis taking into account complete patient's medical history except LUS information.

Perinatal and anthropometric data (gestational age, weight, sex, antenatal steroids, and delivery method) were collected from clinical charts and data regarding neonatal respiratory evolution (hours of oxygen and ventilation, respiratory support-NIV, conventional MV, high frequency oscillatory ventilation or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation-and need for surfactant) were collected during admission.

Statistics All data were analysed using IBM SPSS version 20.0 (IBM Corporation, USA). Clinical features and respiratory outcomes were summarized using descriptive statistics (frequency distribution for categorical data and mean and standard deviation or median and interquartile range for continuous data). Univariate analysis included the Chi-square test and Fisher's exact test, as appropriate, for categorical comparisons, and t-Student or Mann-Whitney test for continuous variables. Wilson method was used to compute confidence interval (CI). Cohen´s kappa coefficient was provided to assess agreement between sonographic and radiologic risk patterns. Predictive values and related parameters (sensibility, specificity and likelihood ratios) were calculated for both diagnostic tests (sonographic pattern risk and radiologic pattern risk); ROC analysis was used to assess efficiency. CI of Area Under the Curve was obtained by the exact method (Clopper-Pearson). All hypothesis tests were two sided and p value less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

105

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Esplugues de Llobregat, Spain
        • Hospital Sant Joan De Deu
      • Esplugues de Llobregat, Spain
        • Javier Rodriguez Fanjul

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

7 months and older (Child, Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients older than 32 weeks admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit with respiratory distress who were not on invasive mechanical ventilation (MV) were eligible for recruitment.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

- Patients older than 32 weeks admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit with respiratory distress who were not on invasive mechanical ventilation (MV) were eligible for recruitment.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients younger than 32 weeks
  • Patients with mechanic ventilation ar admission

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Low risk ultrasound
Patients with a low risk ultrasound
Lung ultrasound performed to newborns with respiratory distress
High risk ultrasound
Patients with a high risk ultrasound
Lung ultrasound performed to newborns with respiratory distress

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
investigate whether LUS performed during the first 2 hours of life is a useful tool to predict respiratory failure of neonates older than 32 weeks with respiratory distress
Time Frame: 2 hours of life
2 hours of life

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Javier Rodríguez-Fanjul, M.D., Hospital Sant Joan de Déu. Esplugues de Llobregat. Spain

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

January 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2014

Study Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2014

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 18, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 19, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

May 20, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

May 20, 2015

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 19, 2015

Last Verified

May 1, 2015

More Information

Terms related to this study

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Ultrasonic Diagnosis

Clinical Trials on Lung ultrasound

3
Subscribe