Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing to Evaluate Pulmonary AVMs With and Without Airflow Obstruction (ExercisePAVM2)

May 29, 2015 updated by: Imperial College London

Hypoxemia, Dyspnea, and Exercise Tolerance in Patients With Pulmonary Arteriovenous Malformations , With and Without Airflow Obstruction

Pulmonary arteriovenous malformations (PAVMs) are a rare vascular condition affecting the lungs. PAVMs lead to low blood oxygen levels, yet are very well tolerated by patients. This study will examine the exercise capacity of PAVM patients using formal cardiopulmonary exercise tests performed on a stationary bicycle, and whether this is affected by the presence of concurrent airflow obstruction, such as due to asthma.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

It is well known that the lung is the site at which oxygen enters the blood stream, diffusing from the alveolar air sacs into the pulmonary capillaries. This newly oxygenated blood is carried to the heart in the pulmonary veins, then passes into the systemic circulation to provide oxygen to the tissues.

Patients with pulmonary arteriovenous malformations (PAVMs) have abnormal vascular connections between pulmonary arteries and pulmonary veins in the lung. Blood flowing through PAVMs therefore bypasses the oxygenation sites in the pulmonary capillaries. Low blood oxygen levels (hypoxemia) is frequent in PAVM patients but breathlessness (dyspnea) is not. The investigators have shown that dyspnea was not a common presenting complaint in a large UK series, and that there is little correlation between severity of dyspnea in PAVM patients, and blood oxygen levels.

In this study the investigators will address the question "Do PAVM patients have lower exercise tolerance if they have concurrent airflow obstruction?" The primary outcome measure will be the total body oxygen consumption in mls/min/kg, at peak exercise (the V[dot]O2 peak (also known as "VO2 max")).

The investigators will address this by first performing standardised cardiopulmonary exercise testing, as used in the clinic and our previous study (11/H0803/9), on age and sex matched patients with PAVMs. 30 will be recruited with airflow obstruction, and 30 without airflow obstruction. Physiological parameters will be compared, to test the null hypothesis that the impact of exercise on PAVM patients' cardiopulmonary systems does not differ according to the presence or absence of airflow obstruction. Cellular and molecular methods will be used to dissect mechanistic pathways.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

60

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years to 80 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT, CHILD)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Ability to provide informed consent
  • Pulmonary AVMs no airflow obstruction: Pulmonary AVMs confirmed by CT scan and no evidence or history of airflow obstruction on clinical grounds, or by spirometric evaluations.
  • Pulmonary AVMs with airflow obstruction: Pulmonary AVMs confirmed by CT scan and evidence or history of airflow obstruction on clinical grounds, and/or by spirometric evaluations (such as FEV1/VC ratio <80%).

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Inability to provide informed consent
  • Any known cardiovascular abnormality including a history of syncope (faintness, dizziness, lightheadedness or loss of consciousness due to an abnormality of the cardiovascular system).
  • Current respiratory tract infection (eg a cold).
  • Pregnancy.
  • Claustrophobia or needle phobia

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: SUPPORTIVE_CARE
  • Allocation: NON_RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Patients with pulmonary AVMs and no airflow obstruction
30 patients with pulmonary AVMs and no airflow obstruction will undergo cardiopulmonary exercise testing
Subjects will have the test in the Exercise Suite of Hammersmith Hospital, London, UK. They will have painless skin probes placed on their fingers, chest, and legs to monitor heart rate, ECG, blood oxygen levels, and oxygen delivery during the test. Subjects will also be shown how to breathe through a mouthpiece with a nose clip on, and how to indicate on a sliding device whether they feel breathless. They will then start cycling against a very low resistance at a steady speed. As long as they feel comfortable, there will be a gradual increase in work load until they feel they cannot keep going at the same speed. They can also stop sooner for any reason. Afterwards, while they are "cooling down", they will fill in a short questionnaire describing how they feel. 20-30mls of blood will be taken for analysis.
Other Names:
  • CPET
Experimental: Patients with pulmonary AVMs and airflow obstruction
30 patients with pulmonary AVMs and airflow obstruction will undergo cardiopulmonary exercise testing
Subjects will have the test in the Exercise Suite of Hammersmith Hospital, London, UK. They will have painless skin probes placed on their fingers, chest, and legs to monitor heart rate, ECG, blood oxygen levels, and oxygen delivery during the test. Subjects will also be shown how to breathe through a mouthpiece with a nose clip on, and how to indicate on a sliding device whether they feel breathless. They will then start cycling against a very low resistance at a steady speed. As long as they feel comfortable, there will be a gradual increase in work load until they feel they cannot keep going at the same speed. They can also stop sooner for any reason. Afterwards, while they are "cooling down", they will fill in a short questionnaire describing how they feel. 20-30mls of blood will be taken for analysis.
Other Names:
  • CPET

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Total body oxygen consumption in mls/min/kg, at peak exercise (VO2 max).
Time Frame: Same day (within 1 hour), at end of exercise study
Of the many measurements and derived indices that can be measured during cardiopulmonary exercise testing, the peak consumption of oxygen (VO2 max) is perhaps the best indicator of integrated cardiorespiratory capacity. The principle research question will therefore test the null hypothesis that "The VO2 max does not differ between PAVM patients with and without airflow obstruction."
Same day (within 1 hour), at end of exercise study

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Breathing reserve
Time Frame: Same day (within 1 hour), at end of exercise study
We will also test in univariate and multiple regression analyses whether breathing reserve differs between PAVM patients with and without airflow obstruction.
Same day (within 1 hour), at end of exercise study
Ventilatory efficiency
Time Frame: Same day (within 1 hour), at end of exercise study
We will also test in univariate and multiple regression analyses whether ventilatory efficiency differs between PAVM patients with and without airflow obstruction.
Same day (within 1 hour), at end of exercise study

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Claire L Shovlin, PhD FRCP, Hammersmith Hospital, Du Cane Rd, London, United Kingdom, W12 0NN

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

May 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

May 1, 2018

Study Completion (Anticipated)

May 1, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 28, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 29, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

June 1, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

June 1, 2015

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 29, 2015

Last Verified

April 1, 2015

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Asthma

Clinical Trials on Cardiopulmonary exercise test

3
Subscribe