Left Ventricular Stiffness vs. Fibrosis Quantification by T1 Mapping in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction (STIFFMAP)

May 6, 2021 updated by: Philipp Lurz, Heart Center Leipzig - University Hospital

Comparison of Non-invasive Assessment of Cardiac Fibrosis by MRI Derived T1-Mapping and Ventricular Intrinsic Diastolic Function by Pressure-volume-analysis in Patients With Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction

StiffMAP-HFpEF trial is an investigator initiated, observational, single-center study that will evaluate whether fibrosis quantification by cardiac MRI correlates with left and right ventricular stiffness derived from pressure-volume analysis, aiming to clarify if cardiac MRI is a valid, non-invasive method to assess diastolic function in patients with Heart Failure with preserved ejection fraction.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Heart Failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) and diastolic dysfunction is a growing medical challenge. To date almost every second patient with heart failure has a preserved ejection fraction and recent data show that outcomes in these patients are as bad as in those with reduced ejection fraction. In clinical routine the diagnosis of HFpEF is complicated by indirect assessment of diastolic function. Mechanistically the diastolic dysfunction is among others believed to be caused by the development of diffuse myocardial fibrosis with an increase of extracellular matrix.

Direct assessment of the intrinsic diastolic function and stiffness of the ventricle can be obtained by pressure-volume-curve tracings through a conductance catheter. Although this offers the benefit of assessing load-dependent and load-independent parameters of diastolic function as well as information on contractility and ventricular-arterial coupling, the use of this technique is limited by its invasiveness in daily care.

Newer MRI techniques have made it possible to quantify not only local fibrosis but also diffuse fibrosis (i.e. T1-Mapping) and determine extracellular volumes.

Moreover, the role of right ventricular function is in HFpEF is not well defined.

Aim of the current study is therefore to evaluate the role of MRI in assessing cardiac fibrosis in the context of impaired LV diastolic function in HFpEF patients, as well as to evaluate the role of systolic and diastolic right ventricular functional impairment in this patient cohort.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

36

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Leipzig, Germany, 04289
        • Heart Center of the University Leipzig

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Recruitment of consequtive patients from our general cardiology clinic that present with signs of heart failure or suspected CAD with indication for invasive assessment and fullfill eligibility criteria.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • LV-EF > 50%
  • Indication for invasive cardiac catheterization

Exclusion Criteria:

  • know CAD or CAD in Angiography (stenoses > 50%)
  • acute coronary syndromes
  • Cerebral ischemia within the last year
  • contraindications for MRI
  • more than mild valvular disease
  • Constrictive pericarditis, restrictive Cardiomyopathy, pericardial effusion
  • pregnancy
  • enrolment in other study

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Case-Control
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
HFpEF and servere diastolic dysfuntion
Left ventricular ejection fraction (LV-EF) > 50%, echocardiographic criteria for diastolic dysfunction, New York Heart Association classification (NYHA)=>2, Diagnostic P-V-loops and MRI
Invasive assessment of P-V-loops during catheterization for suspected CAD Magnetic resonance Imaging for assessment of myocardial fibrosis and biventricular function
HFpEF no servere diastolic dysfuntion
LV-EF > 50%, no echocardiographic criteria for diastolic dysfunction, NYHA=>2, Diagnostic P-V-loops and MRI
Invasive assessment of P-V-loops during catheterization for suspected CAD Magnetic resonance Imaging for assessment of myocardial fibrosis and biventricular function
No HF or diastolic dysfunction
LV-EF > 50%, no diastolic dysfunction, no heart failure, Diagnostic P-V-loops and MRI
Invasive assessment of P-V-loops during catheterization for suspected CAD Magnetic resonance Imaging for assessment of myocardial fibrosis and biventricular function

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Correlation of extracellular volume (MRI) and myocardial stiffness (p-v-loops)
Time Frame: Baseline
Baseline

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
LV stiffness constant (ß) between groups
Time Frame: Baseline
Baseline
Time constant of LV-relaxation (Ƭ) between groups
Time Frame: Baseline
Baseline
Change in endiastolic pressure volume relation (EDPVR) under excercise between groups
Time Frame: Baseline
Baseline
Right Ventricular Endsystolic Elastance Slope
Time Frame: Baseline
Baseline
Right Ventricular Endsystolic Stiffness Constant
Time Frame: Baseline
Baseline

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Philipp Lurz, PhD, University Heart Center Leipzig

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

September 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 19, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 28, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

June 2, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 10, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 6, 2021

Last Verified

May 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 1.02

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Heart Failure With Normal Ejection Fraction

Clinical Trials on Diagnostic P-V-loops and MRI

3
Subscribe