Subcutaneous Immunoglobulin for CIDP (SCIG)

September 14, 2021 updated by: University of South Florida

A Study of Subcutaneous Immunoglobulin as Chronic Treatment for Patients With Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyneuropathy

The investigators are using self administered subcutaneous IG in patients with CIDP who require IVIG. Safety, efficacy, and patient satisfaction will be examined.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP) is an autoimmune neurological disorder that causes limb weakness and numbness. Many patients require immunosuppressants and plasma exchange (PLEX) to control their symptoms. Intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG)is also an effective treatment (Hughes et al, 2006 & 2008; Hughes, 2009; Cocito et al, 2010), and the American Academy of Neurology (AAN) guideline recommended that it should be offered in the long-term treatment of CIDP (Patwa et al, 2012). While effective, IVIG causes systemic side effects in about 5% of patients. These side effects include rash, pruritus, myalgia, fever, chills, headache, low back pain, nausea, vomiting, changes in blood pressure or heart rate, renal failure, and aseptic meningitis (Berger, 2008). For many patients who are chronically treated with IVIG, venous access may be a problem over time. An alternative is the subcutaneous (SC) route, which has been in use since 1980 for primary immune deficiency disorders and is the treatment of choice for this condition in Scandinavia and England (Radinsky et al, 2003). As compared to IV route, SC route maintains higher trough levels of immunoglobulins, increases patient independence, reduces systemic side-effects, and is better tolerated in those who are pregnant or sensitized to IgA (Radinsky et al, 2003). In a review of side effects associated with 33,168 SCIG infusions, no severe or anaphylactoid reactions occurred (Gardulf et al, 1995). Patients can self-administer medication, and hence, overall cost may be reduced. A retrospective study of 28 children with primary immunodeficiency in Canada showed that the mean difference in costs between IVIG and SCIG during the study period (1 year on IVIG and 1 year on SCIG) was $4,346 in favor of SCIG (Ducruet et al, 2011). A US$10,100 reduction in cost per year per patient associated with SCIG use was also reported by Gardulf et al (1995) in Sweden. Disadvantages of SCIG include more frequent infusions and local reactions at sites of infusion (transient swelling, soreness, redness, induration, local heat, and itching) in about 1% of patients.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

20

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Florida
      • Tampa, Florida, United States, 33612
        • USF Dept of Neurology

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

To qualify, a patient must have CIDP and persistence of significant symptoms (having 2 or more of the following):

  • Weakness in any limb,
  • Motor fatigue significant to interfere with ADL or work,
  • Paresthesia of sufficient severity to require a medication,
  • Sensory impairment,
  • Walking impairment,

AND requires IVIG to control symptoms.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Thrombocytopenia or other bleeding disorders,
  2. Anticoagulation therapy,
  3. Severe or anaphylactoid reactions to IVIG,
  4. Cancer,
  5. Pregnancy,
  6. Breast-feeding,
  7. Renal insufficiency or failure,
  8. Congestive heart failure,
  9. Psychiatric illness.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Immune globulin subcutaneous (Human)
lmmune Globulin Subcutaneous(Human) 20% Liquid (Hizentra) will be given weekly
Patients who have CIDP and are on IVIG will be allowed in the study to try subcutaneous immune Globulin (SCIG) as part of an open label study.
Other Names:
  • Hizentra

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Relapse of CIDP Symptoms
Time Frame: 6 months
This is defined as a 20% decrease in force (as detected on Hand-Held Dynamometry (HHD)) in greater that 50% of the muscles tested compared to baseline values
6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Short Form 36
Time Frame: Monthly for six months
This questionnaire evaluates the patient's health status
Monthly for six months
Rasch-built Overall Disability Scale
Time Frame: Monthly for 6 months
The Rasch-built Overall Disability Scale (R-ODS) is an instrument answered by the patient to assess overall disability
Monthly for 6 months
CIP-PRO20
Time Frame: Monthly for 6 months
The CIP-PRO20 is used to evaluate quality of life in patients with polyneuropathy
Monthly for 6 months
Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication
Time Frame: 2-6 weeks prior to Day 1 of treatment and then monthly for 6 months
The TSQM is the Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication will be used to assess the patient's satisfaction with IVIg treatment compared to the use of SCIg treatment
2-6 weeks prior to Day 1 of treatment and then monthly for 6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Tuan Vu, MD, University of South Florida

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

September 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 12, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 4, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

June 8, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 16, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 14, 2021

Last Verified

September 1, 2021

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyneuropathy

Clinical Trials on Immune Globulin Subcutaneous (Human)

3
Subscribe