Yoga Versus Exercises for Managing OA (YEMO)

May 3, 2019 updated by: University of Minnesota

Yoga Versus Aerobic and Strengthening Exercises for Managing Knee Osteoarthritis

The purpose of the study is to examine the short and long term effects of Hatha yoga compared to the current recommended exercise program in promoting physical function, alleviating osteoarthritis (OA)-related symptoms, fear of falling, and improving mood, spiritual health, physical activity level, and quality of life in older adults with knee OA, and to determine the effect sizes for use in power calculations to design a larger efficacy clinical trial.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The specific aims of this pilot project are to:

Aim 1: Examine the short and long term effect of participation in an 8-week intervention of Hatha yoga (HY) on pain, stiffness, physical function of the lower extremities, physical activity, mood, fear of falling, spiritual health, and quality of life in older women with knee OA, compared with the effect in those older adults who participated in aerobic/strengthening exercise (AE) or received general OA education (GE).

Aim 2: Describe the adherence rate (class and home practices) and exercise acceptability of the HY and AE programs.

A randomized controlled trial design with three groups were used: 1) A Hatha yoga (HY) intervention group, 2) an aerobic and local muscle strengthening exercise (AE) control group, and 3) a general OA education (GE) true control group. Both yoga and exercise groups involved group and home practice sessions. Participants in the GE group received education on OA management after randomization. A weekly phone call were placed to them during the intervention period to reinforce OA knowledge. Data were collected from all participants at baseline, 4 weeks, and 8 weeks during the intervention, and quarterly for one year during the follow up period.

Study Endpoints

  1. Primary endpoint: OA status (pain, stiffness and function) at 8 weeks.
  2. Secondary endpoint: physical function of lower extremities, mood, and quality of life at 8 weeks.
  3. Tertiary endpoint: Long term exercise adherence and effects on outcome measures, program acceptability, and safety.

Sample Size and Recruitment Eight-three community dwelling older adults ages 60 years - 100 years old with a diagnosis of symptomatic knee OA were recruited. Recruitment were done through conducting presentations at various senior centers; distributing press release to various community newsletters, local and senior newspapers, and through working with my co-investigators, and accessing the data base and mailing invitation letters out to patients meeting demographic and diagnostic criteria from the University of Minnesota Physician Practice.

Each weekly group based session is 45 minute in length for all groups. Participants in the yoga group were recommended to practice for additional 30 minutes four times a week at home. Participants in the A/E class were recommended to practice 3 times on non-consecutive days at home as recommended by the current physical activity guidelines for older adults. To assist participants with maintaining exercise adherence and practicing yoga and aerobic/strengthening exercises at home correctly, handouts illustrating yoga/exercise activity were distributed at the end of each class. Participants also were asked to videotape and keep a log of their exercise practice during the intervention period. Video camera were provided. Long term exercise adherence was assessing using an exercise diary. Participants were asked to keep an exercise diary during the follow up period. A focus group will be conducted at the end of the follow-up period to examine the experience of using HY or AE for managing knee OA, and factors that affect participants' HY/AE adherence.

Descriptive statistics will be used to analyze and report demographic data and feasibility/acceptability data. Inferential statistics (t-test or non-parametric equivalent such as Mann-Whitney, and chi-square test) will be used to analyze the OA symptoms, physical and psychological outcomes. The α level will be set at ≤ .05.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

83

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Minnesota
      • Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States, 55455
        • University of Minnesota

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

58 years to 98 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • have been diagnosed with symptomatic OA of knee for at least 6 months,
  • have not practiced any form of yoga for at least 2 months; and
  • not currently participating in a supervised exercise program. "Currently" is defined as not participating in a supervised exercise program more than 2 times a week at the time of second-step screening.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • OA is asymptomatic,
  • have moderate/severe cognitive impairment, scored less than 8 on the Short Portable Mental Status Questionnaire,
  • have cardiovascular risk,
  • reported symptoms of joint locking,
  • instability indicated by chronic use of a knee brace, cane, walker, or wheelchair,
  • corticosteroid injection in the symptomatic joint within 3 months of study entry,
  • hyaluronic acid injection: hyaluronan (Hyalgan) and synthetic hylan G-F 20 (Synvisc) in the symptomatic joint within 6 months of study entry,
  • history of knee surgery within the last two years, arthroscopic lavage within 6 months, or a joint replacement of the lower extremities at any point,
  • self-reported significant medical comorbidities such as: 1) uncontrolled high blood pressure or existing heart condition; and 2) other comorbid condition with overlapping symptoms (i.e. fibromyalgia, rheumatoid arthritis),
  • Individuals who have medication changes for arthritis symptoms will be permitted to remain in the trial; however, these changes will be monitored.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Yoga Group
Participants in the yoga group received a total of eight weekly 45 minute yoga classes. A sequence of 8 - 10 core yoga poses, breathing and relaxation techniques were practiced in each yoga class, and 2 - 3 new poses were introduced progressively in each of the yoga session. Props such as blocks, blankets, belts, mats, and chairs were used during the session. Handouts were provided for participants to practice the yoga program for additional 30 minutes a day, 4 days a week at home.
A sequence of 8 - 10 core yoga poses, breathing and relaxation techniques were practiced in each yoga class, and 2 - 3 new poses were introduced progressively in each of the yoga session. Props such as blocks, blankets, belts, mats, and chairs were used during the session.
Other Names:
  • Yoga
Active Comparator: Aerobic and Strengthening Exercise Group
Participants in the exercise group received a total of eight weekly 45 minute exercise classes. A 15 minute of gentle aerobic exercise and a 30 minute of strengthening program that includes both isometric (without moving the joints) and isotonic (moving the joints) exercises of the lower extremities were taught to the participants. Handouts were provided for participants to practice the program at home for 30 minutes a day, 3 days a week (on non-consecutive days).
A 15 minute of gentle aerobic exercise and a 30 minute of strengthening program that includes both isometric (without moving the joints) and isotonic (moving the joints) exercises of the lower extremities were taught to the participants.
Active Comparator: General education
Participants in this group received a one-time OA educational brochures from the Arthritis Foundation including topics focusing on the disease process, diet and exercise and OA management education. Participants were instructed not to begin any new exercise programs during the study period.
One-time Arthritis Foundation educational brochures focusing on the disease process, diet and exercise and OA management education were given.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Osteoarthritis (OA) symptoms change
Time Frame: Change from baseline OA symtptoms at 8 weeks
OA pain, stiffness and function (total score) is evaluated using the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities OA (WOMAC) index scale.
Change from baseline OA symtptoms at 8 weeks
Knee OA pain change
Time Frame: Change from baseline pain score at 8 weeks
Visual Analog Scale
Change from baseline pain score at 8 weeks
Knee OA pain change
Time Frame: Change from baseline number of medication used per day for OA pain at 8 weeks
Number of pain medication used per day for OA pain
Change from baseline number of medication used per day for OA pain at 8 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Physical function
Time Frame: 4 and 8 weeks
The Short Physical Performance Battery, which includes repeated chair stands, balance and 8 foot walk tests, is used to evaluate participants' physical function of lower extremities.
4 and 8 weeks
Gait speed
Time Frame: 4 and 8 weeks
50 foot walk is used to measure gait speed.
4 and 8 weeks
Physical activity level
Time Frame: 4 and 8 weeks
Physical Activity Scale for the Elderly is used to evaluate the different physical activity levels: leisure time activity, household activity, and work-related activity.
4 and 8 weeks
Fear of falling
Time Frame: 4 and 8 weeks
Fear of falling is evaluated using the Falls Efficacy Scale-International.
4 and 8 weeks
Spiritual health
Time Frame: 4 and 8 weeks
Self-Transcendence Scale is used to evaluate participants' spiritual health.
4 and 8 weeks
Quality of life
Time Frame: 4 and 8 weeks
SF 12 v2 Health Survey is used for measuring quality of life.
4 and 8 weeks
Mood
Time Frame: 4 and 8 weeks
Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale is used to evaluate mood.
4 and 8 weeks

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Feasibility - number of eligible subjects
Time Frame: Baseline
Number of eligible subjects will be assessed by the total number of subjects enrolled in the study.
Baseline
Feasibility - exercise adherence
Time Frame: 8 weeks

Exercise adherence will be assessed base on the:

  1. Average class attendance (weekly class attendance sheet recorded by the RA)
  2. Frequency of home practice: the average number of days per week, and the average number of minutes per day (participants' weekly self-report on an exercise log sheet).
8 weeks
Feasibility - adverse events
Time Frame: 8 weeks
RA will record any number or type of yoga related adverse events during the intervention classes. Participants will record any number or type of yoga related adverse events during their home practice on the exercise log sheet.
8 weeks
Feasibility - retention rate
Time Frame: 8 weeks
Retention rate will be assessed by the number of participants remain in the study.
8 weeks
Acceptability
Time Frame: 8 weeks
An investigator-developed survey using a 10 point Likert scale will be used to assess participants' self-report satisfaction with the intervention program, perceived appropriateness of the program, and intention to continue to use the intervention program.
8 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

April 1, 2013

Primary Completion (Actual)

July 1, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

July 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 20, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 13, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

August 17, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 7, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 3, 2019

Last Verified

May 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Knee Osteoarthritis

Clinical Trials on Hatha yoga

3
Subscribe