ABI v Dry Needling for Plantar Fasciitis

September 7, 2020 updated by: University Hospitals, Leicester

Investigating the Effects of Ultrasound Guided Autologous Blood Injection for Chronic Plantar Fasciitis Versus Ultrasound Guided Dry-needling Alone, a Randomised Controlled Trial

To investigate whether a procedure of ultrasound-guided autologous blood injections (ABI), which includes a dry-needling component within the overall procedure, has any measureable clinical benefit over ultrasound-guided dry needling alone in patients with chronic plantar fasciitis.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

90

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Leicester, United Kingdom
        • University Hospitals Of Leicester Nhs Trust

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 120 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients aged 18 or over who are being seen in the Department of Sports Medicine (all of whom are age 16 or over) with chronic plantar fasciitis of at least 6 months duration
  2. Failure of previous conservative therapy - including physiotherapy, and podiatry input
  3. Objective evidence of plantar fasciitis - either ultrasound or MRI investigations
  4. No contraindications of injection therapy - anticoagulation, blood borne illness, strong needle phobia …

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients with either partial or full-thickness tears of plantar fascia found on investigations
  2. Subjects who are unable to give valid consent for study entry based on normal competency assessment
  3. Subjects unable or unwilling to undergo the rehabilitation plan post-procedure
  4. Subjects unable or unwilling to attend the follow-up appointments post-procedure

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: DOUBLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: intervention group

local anaesthetic - lidocaine 1%, dry needling, autologous blood injection,

+ structured rehab programme

ultrasound-guided autologous blood injection procedure
(this intervention is given to patients in both arms of the study) - a standardised structured rehabilitation programme of home exercises that the patient is instructed on how to start, and how to progress during the study period
(this intervention is given to patients in both arms of the study) - ultrasound-guided dry needling injection performed under ultrasound guidance
PLACEBO_COMPARATOR: control group

local anaesthetic - lidocaine 1%, dry needling,

+ structured rehab programme

(this intervention is given to patients in both arms of the study) - a standardised structured rehabilitation programme of home exercises that the patient is instructed on how to start, and how to progress during the study period
(this intervention is given to patients in both arms of the study) - ultrasound-guided dry needling injection performed under ultrasound guidance

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Reduction in pain - as assessed by 0-10 VAS scale
Time Frame: 3 & 6 months - primary outcome set at 6 months for study, but using 3 month interim result as well
3 & 6 months - primary outcome set at 6 months for study, but using 3 month interim result as well

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Reduction in pain / improvement in function - as assessed by several PROMS (as below)
Time Frame: 3 & 6 months
validated PROMs in use in this study include: FFI-r, MOXFQ, FAAM
3 & 6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

October 1, 2014

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

September 4, 2020

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

September 4, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 15, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 7, 2015

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

September 10, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

September 9, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 7, 2020

Last Verified

September 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • UHL - 11334

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Plantar Fasciitis

Clinical Trials on Autologous Blood Injection

3
Subscribe