An Observational Study to Evaluate the Effectiveness of Mircera Treatment for Renal Anemia in Pre-dialysis Participants With Chronic Kideny Disease (CKD)

May 9, 2017 updated by: Hoffmann-La Roche

Investigating the Effectiveness of Renal Anaemia Treatment in Pre-Dialysis Patients With Mircera in Daily Clinical Practice - MIRVITA

This observational trial will examine the efficacy and safety of Mircera for renal anemia in participants with stage III-IV CKD in daily clinical practice. Mircera will be prescribed by treating physician and followed for approximately 36 months.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

393

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Celje, Slovenia, 3000
        • Hospital Celje; Dept For Kidney Disease & Dialysis
      • Izola, Slovenia, 6310
        • Splosna Bolnisnica Izola; Oddelek Za Nefrologijo
      • Ljubljana, Slovenia, 1000
        • Clinical Centre Ljubljana; Clinical Dep. For Nephrology
      • Ljubljana, Slovenia, 1000
        • Nefroloska Ambulanta
      • Maribor, Slovenia, 2000
        • Hospital Maribor; Clinical Dept For Internal Medicine
      • Murska Sobota, Slovenia, 9000
        • Splosna Bolnisnica Murska Sobota; Oddelek Za Nefrologijo
      • Nova Gorica, Slovenia, 5000
        • Zdravstveni Zavod Medicinski Center Šinigoj Nova Gorica
      • Novo Mesto, Slovenia, 8000
        • Hospital Novo Mesto; Dialysis Dept
      • Ptuj, Slovenia, 2250
        • Hospital Dr.Joze Potre; Dialysis Dept
      • Sempeter Pri Novi Gorici, Slovenia, 5390
        • Splosna Bolnisnica Franc Derganc; Oddelek Za Nefrologijo
      • Slovenj Gradec, Slovenia, 2380
        • Hospital Slovenj Gradec; Hemodialysis Dept
      • Trbovlje, Slovenia, 1420
        • Splosna Bolnisnica Trbovlje; Oddelek Za Nefrologijo

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

17 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Participants with CKD who do not require dialysis and are appropriate for treatment with Mircera according to European Best Practice Guidelines (EBPG) and Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative (K/DOQI) guidelines.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Participants aged > 18 years with CKD
  • Participants who are eligible for Mircera treatment according to current guidelines and summary of product characteristics (SmPC)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Non-renal anemia
  • Pregnancy and breast-feeding
  • Uncontrolled hypertension
  • Known hypersensitivity to methoxy polyethylene glycol-epoetin beta
  • Administration of any other study drug within 30 days prior to study enrollment

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Case-Only
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
CKD participants treated with Mircera
Participants with CKD received Mircera, as per routine clinical practice and was followed for approximately 36 months.
Other Names:
  • Mircera

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of Participants With Hemoglobin (Hb) Value Within the Target Range (110 to 120 Grams Per Liter [g/L]) at Baseline
Time Frame: Baseline
If a participant had more than 1 assessment during the specified time frame, the last observed Hb value was considered for calculation.
Baseline
Percentage of Participants With Hb Value Within the Target Range (110 to 120 g/L) at Months 1-3
Time Frame: At Months 1-3
If a participant had more than 1 assessment during the specified time frame, the last observed Hb value was considered for calculation.
At Months 1-3
Percentage of Participants With Hb Value Within the Target Range (110 to 120 g/L) at Months 4-6
Time Frame: At Months 4-6
If a participant had more than 1 assessment during the specified time frame, the last observed Hb value was considered for calculation.
At Months 4-6
Percentage of Participants With Hb Value Within the Target Range (110 to 120 g/L) at Months 7-9
Time Frame: At Months 7-9
If a participant had more than 1 assessment during the specified time frame, the last observed Hb value was considered for calculation.
At Months 7-9
Percentage of Participants With Hb Value Within the Target Range (110 to 120 g/L) at Months 10-12
Time Frame: At Months 10-12
If a participant had more than 1 assessment during the specified time frame, the last observed Hb value was considered for calculation.
At Months 10-12
Percentage of Participants With Hb Value Within the Target Range (110 to 120 g/L) at Months 13-15
Time Frame: At Months 13-15
If a participant had more than 1 assessment during the specified time frame, the last observed Hb value was considered for calculation.
At Months 13-15
Percentage of Participants With Hb Value Within the Target Range (110 to 120 g/L) at Months 16-18
Time Frame: At Months 16-18
If a participant had more than 1 assessment during the specified time frame, the last observed Hb value was considered for calculation.
At Months 16-18
Percentage of Participants With Hb Value Within the Target Range (110 to 120 g/L) at Months 19-21
Time Frame: At Months 19-21
If a participant had more than 1 assessment during the specified time frame, the last observed Hb value was considered for calculation.
At Months 19-21
Percentage of Participants With Hb Value Within the Target Range (110 to 120 g/L) After 21 Months up to 36 Months
Time Frame: After 21 Months up to 36 Months
If a participant had more than 1 assessment during the specified time frame, the last observed Hb value was considered for calculation.
After 21 Months up to 36 Months
Percentage of Participants With Hemoglobin (Hb) Value Within the Target Range (100 to 130 g/L) at Baseline
Time Frame: At Baseline
If a participant had more than 1 assessment during the specified time frame, the last observed Hb value was considered for calculation.
At Baseline
Percentage of Participants With Hb Value Within the Target Range (100 to 130 g/L) at Months 1-3
Time Frame: At Months 1-3
If a participant had more than 1 assessment during the specified time frame, the last observed Hb value was considered for calculation.
At Months 1-3
Percentage of Participants With Hb Value Within the Target Range (100 to 130 g/L) at Months 4-6
Time Frame: At Months 4-6
If a participant had more than 1 assessment during the specified time frame, the last observed Hb value was considered for calculation.
At Months 4-6
Percentage of Participants With Hb Value Within the Target Range (100 to 130 g/L) at Months 7-9
Time Frame: At Months 7-9
If a participant had more than 1 assessment during the specified time frame, the last observed Hb value was considered for calculation.
At Months 7-9
Percentage of Participants With Hb Value Within the Target Range (100 to 130 g/L) at Months 10-12
Time Frame: At Months 10-12
If a participant had more than 1 assessment during the specified time frame, the last observed Hb value was considered for calculation.
At Months 10-12
Percentage of Participants With Hb Value Within the Target Range (100 to 130 g/L) at Months 13-15
Time Frame: At Months 13-15
If a participant had more than 1 assessment during the specified time frame, the last observed Hb value was considered for calculation.
At Months 13-15
Percentage of Participants With Hb Value Within the Target Range (100 to 130 g/L) at Months 16-18
Time Frame: At Months 16-18
If a participant had more than 1 assessment during the specified time frame, the last observed Hb value was considered for calculation.
At Months 16-18
Percentage of Participants With Hb Value Within the Target Range (100 to 130 g/L) at Months 19-21
Time Frame: At Months 19-21
If a participant had more than 1 assessment during the specified time frame, the last observed Hb value was considered for calculation.
At Months 19-21
Percentage of Participants With Hb Value Within the Target Range (100 to 130 g/L) After 21 Months up to 36 Months
Time Frame: After 21 Months up to 36 Months
If a participant had more than 1 assessment during the specified time frame, the last observed Hb value was considered for calculation.
After 21 Months up to 36 Months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Median Time in Which Hb Value Was Maintained Within Target Range of 110-120 g/L
Time Frame: Up to 36 Months
Up to 36 Months
Median Time in Which Hb Value Was Maintained Within Target Range of 100-130 g/L
Time Frame: Up to 36 Months
Up to 36 Months
Average Dose of Methoxy Polyethylene Glycol-Epoetin Beta
Time Frame: Baseline
Average dose of methoxy polyethylene glycol-epoetin beta administered at Baseline
Baseline
Median Dose of Methoxy Polyethylene Glycol-Epoetin Beta
Time Frame: Month 1, Month 3, Month 6, Month 9, Month 12, Month 15, Month 18, Month 21 and After 21 Months up to 36 Months
Median monthly dose of methoxy polyethylene glycol-epoetin beta administered in the study up to 36 months.
Month 1, Month 3, Month 6, Month 9, Month 12, Month 15, Month 18, Month 21 and After 21 Months up to 36 Months
Number of Dose Adaptations
Time Frame: Up to 36 Months
Total number of changes (increase or decrease) in daily methoxy polyethylene glycol-epoetin beta doses. The reasons for dose-adaptations included: inflammation or infection; kidney function decline; over-response; iron deficiency; insufficient response; adverse effect; start of maintenance dose; kidney function improvement; re-introduction of treatment; and others (other reasons than specified).
Up to 36 Months
Percentage of Participants With Dose 0
Time Frame: Up to 36 Months
Percentage of participants who did not use methoxy polyethylene glycol-epoetin beta (Dose 0) at atleast one visit during study period.
Up to 36 Months
Percentage of Participants With Iron Replacement
Time Frame: Up to 36 Months
Iron replacement was given to the participants either in oral iron replacement or intravenous replacement or both.
Up to 36 Months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 31, 2008

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 30, 2014

Study Completion (Actual)

November 30, 2014

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 9, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 9, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

September 11, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 7, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 9, 2017

Last Verified

May 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • ML22069

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Kidney Disease, Chronic

Clinical Trials on Methoxy polyethylene glycol-epoetin beta

3
Subscribe