Coronary Bifurcation Lesions Treated With Biguard Stent System (BIGUARD)

December 5, 2017 updated by: Shaoliang Chen, Nanjing First Hospital, Nanjing Medical University

A Prospective, Multi-center, Randomized Trial Comparing Biguard Stent With Regular Sirolimus-eluting Stent System for Patients With Coronary Bifurcation Lesions

This study is designed to test the hypothesis that the Biguard stent system will lead to fewer target lesion failure compared to regular stent system in patients with coronary bifurcation lesions at one year.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The current study is designed as a multicenter, randomized and prospective study aiming to compare the effect of Biguard bifurcation stent system and regular stent system in patients with bifurcation lesions. Based on the previous studies, the rate of 1-year target lesion failure was around 12% after PCI with regular stent system. And the investigators previous data showed that this event at 12-month after Biguard bifurcation stent system was 4%. Considering the lost to follow-up, it is anticipated that up to 400 patients will be enrolled in the trial. All patients will have repeat angiography at 13 months, with clinical follow-up to 2 years.

Study Type

Interventional

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Subject must be age≥18 years;
  • Subject (or legal guardian) understands the trial requirements and the treatment procedures and provides written informed consent before any trial-specific tests or procedures are performed;
  • Subject is eligible for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI);
  • Subject has symptomatic coronary artery disease or documented silent ischemia;
  • Subject is willing to comply with all protocol-required follow-up evaluations;
  • Target lesion must be a de novo true bifurcation lesions located in a native coronary artery with a visually estimated reference vessel diameter (RVD) ≥2.50 mm and ≤4.00 mm;
  • Target lesion must have visually estimated stenosis ≥50%;
  • The lesion length of main branch vessel must measure <40 mm, and the lesion length of side branch vessel must measure <20 mm (by visual estimate);
  • Subject with no more than one lesion existing in the same vessel can be chosen, when several bifurcation lesions existing simultaneously;
  • Subject with knowledge of trial purpose, informed consents and volition of undergoing coronary angiography and clinical follow-up voluntarily.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Subject has clinical symptoms and/or electrocardiogram (ECG) changes consistent with acute MI within two weeks;
  • Subject is on dialysis or has serum creatinine level >3.0 mg/dL;
  • Subject has known allergy to the study stent system or protocol-required concomitant medications;
  • Subject has any other serious medical illness that may reduce life expectancy to less than 12 months; Patient with cardiac heart failure (above New York Heart Association (classification) III), or left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF)< 30%;
  • Subject with hemorrhagic tendency or history of active peptic ulcers, cerebral hemorrhage, or subarachnoid hemorrhage, cerebral stroke within half a year, as well as patients who have contraindication to anti-platelet agents or anticoagulant treatment;
  • Subject is participating in another investigational drug or device clinical trial that has not reached its primary endpoint or intends to participate in another investigational drug or device clinical trial within 12 months after the index procedure;
  • Subject Inability to follow the protocol and comply with follow-up requirements or any other reason that the investigator feels would place the patient at increased risk- Subject has more than 1 lesion that requires treatment during the index procedure;
  • Target lesion meets any of the following criteria:

    1. Thrombus, or possible thrombus, present in the target vessel;
    2. Excessive tortuosity proximal to or within the lesion;
    3. Excessive angulation proximal to or within the lesion;
    4. Chronic total occlusion lesion in target vessel not re-canalized;
    5. severe calcification with unsuccessfully pre-dilated;
    6. restenosis disease.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: SINGLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Biguard stent system
PCI with Biguard sirolimus-eluting bifurcation stent system
PCI with Biguard sirolimus-eluting bifurcation stent system
Other Names:
  • Biguard Stent System
Active Comparator: Sirolimus-eluting stent system
PCI with regular sirolimus-eluting stent system
PCI with sirolimus-eluting stent system
Other Names:
  • SES

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Incidence of Ischemia Driven Target Lesion Failure (ID-TLF)
Time Frame: 12 months
The number of participants with adverse events that are related to treatment. Adverse events included cardiac death (death in which a cardiac cause cannot be excluded), Myocardial infarction (MI, classified as Q-wave and non-Q wave), Ischemia-driven target lesion revascularization (TLR) by CABG or PCI and Ischemia-driven target vessel revascularization (TVR) by CABG or PCI.
12 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
In-stent late lumen loss in millimeter
Time Frame: 13 months
In-stent MLD post-procedure minus in-stent MLD at follow-up (in-stent defined as within the margins of the stent)
13 months
Proximal Late Loss in millimeter
Time Frame: 13 months
Proximal Minimum Lumen Diameter (MLD) post-procedure minus proximal MLD at follow-up (proximal defined as within 5 mm of healthy tissue proximal to stent placement)
13 months
Distal Late Loss in millimeter
Time Frame: 13 months
Distal MLD post-procedure minus distal MLD at follow-up (distal defined as within 5 mm of healthy tissue distal to stent placement)
13 months
Incidence of Target Vessel Failure (TVF)
Time Frame: 30 days
The number of participants with adverse events that are related to treatment. Adverse events included cardiac death (death in which a cardiac cause cannot be excluded), Myocardial infarction (MI, classified as Q-wave and non-Q wave), Ischemia-driven target lesion revascularization (TLR) by CABG or PCI and Ischemia-driven target vessel revascularization (TVR) by CABG or PCI.
30 days
Incidence of Target Vessel Failure (TVF)
Time Frame: 1 year
The number of participants with adverse events that are related to treatment. Adverse events included cardiac death (death in which a cardiac cause cannot be excluded), Myocardial infarction (MI, classified as Q-wave and non-Q wave), Ischemia-driven target lesion revascularization (TLR) by CABG or PCI and Ischemia-driven target vessel revascularization (TVR) by CABG or PCI.
1 year
Incidence of Target Vessel Failure (TVF)
Time Frame: 3 year
The number of participants with adverse events that are related to treatment. Adverse events included cardiac death (death in which a cardiac cause cannot be excluded), Myocardial infarction (MI, classified as Q-wave and non-Q wave), Ischemia-driven target lesion revascularization (TLR) by CABG or PCI and Ischemia-driven target vessel revascularization (TVR) by CABG or PCI.
3 year
Incidence of Target Vessel Failure (TVF)
Time Frame: 5 year
The number of participants with adverse events that are related to treatment. Adverse events included cardiac death (death in which a cardiac cause cannot be excluded), Myocardial infarction (MI, classified as Q-wave and non-Q wave), Ischemia-driven target lesion revascularization (TLR) by CABG or PCI and Ischemia-driven target vessel revascularization (TVR) by CABG or PCI.
5 year
Incidence of Ischemia Driven Target Lesion Revascularization (ID-TLR)
Time Frame: 30 days
The number of participants with revascularization at target lesion associated with any of following: functional ischemia study Ischemic symptoms & angiographic diameter stenosis ≥50% by core lab quantitative coronary angiography (QCA), revascularization of a target lesion with angiographic diameter stenosis ≥70% by core laboratory QCA without angina or functional study.
30 days
Incidence of Ischemia Driven Target Lesion Revascularization (ID-TLR)
Time Frame: 1 year
The number of participants with revascularization at target lesion associated with any of following: functional ischemia study Ischemic symptoms & angiographic diameter stenosis ≥50% by core lab quantitative coronary angiography (QCA), revascularization of a target lesion with angiographic diameter stenosis ≥70% by core laboratory QCA without angina or functional study.
1 year
Incidence of Ischemia Driven Target Lesion Revascularization (ID-TLR)
Time Frame: 3 year
The number of participants with revascularization at target lesion associated with any of following: functional ischemia study Ischemic symptoms & angiographic diameter stenosis ≥50% by core lab quantitative coronary angiography (QCA), revascularization of a target lesion with angiographic diameter stenosis ≥70% by core laboratory QCA without angina or functional study.
3 year
Incidence of Ischemia Driven Target Lesion Revascularization (ID-TLR)
Time Frame: 5 year
The number of participants with revascularization at target lesion associated with any of following: functional ischemia study Ischemic symptoms & angiographic diameter stenosis ≥50% by core lab quantitative coronary angiography (QCA), revascularization of a target lesion with angiographic diameter stenosis ≥70% by core laboratory QCA without angina or functional study.
5 year
Incidence of Ischemia Driven Target Vessel Revascularization (ID-TVR)
Time Frame: 30 days
The number of participants with revascularization at the target vessel associated with any of the following Positive functional ischemia study Ischemic symptoms and angiographic diameter stenosis ≥ 50% by core laboratory QCA Revascularization of a target vessel with angiographic diameter stenosis ≥ 70% by core laboratory QCA without angina or positive functional study Derived from Non-Hierarchical Subject Counts of Adverse Events
30 days
Incidence of Ischemia Driven Target Vessel Revascularization (ID-TVR)
Time Frame: 1 year
The number of participants with revascularization at the target vessel associated with any of the following Positive functional ischemia study Ischemic symptoms and angiographic diameter stenosis ≥ 50% by core laboratory QCA Revascularization of a target vessel with angiographic diameter stenosis ≥ 70% by core laboratory QCA without angina or positive functional study Derived from Non-Hierarchical Subject Counts of Adverse Events
1 year
Incidence of Ischemia Driven Target Vessel Revascularization (ID-TVR)
Time Frame: 3 year
The number of participants with revascularization at the target vessel associated with any of the following Positive functional ischemia study Ischemic symptoms and angiographic diameter stenosis ≥ 50% by core laboratory QCA Revascularization of a target vessel with angiographic diameter stenosis ≥ 70% by core laboratory QCA without angina or positive functional study Derived from Non-Hierarchical Subject Counts of Adverse Events
3 year
Incidence of Ischemia Driven Target Vessel Revascularization (ID-TVR)
Time Frame: 5 year
The number of participants with revascularization at the target vessel associated with any of the following Positive functional ischemia study Ischemic symptoms and angiographic diameter stenosis ≥ 50% by core laboratory QCA Revascularization of a target vessel with angiographic diameter stenosis ≥ 70% by core laboratory QCA without angina or positive functional study Derived from Non-Hierarchical Subject Counts of Adverse Events
5 year
Incidence of Ischemia Driven Major Adverse Cardiac Event (MACE)
Time Frame: 30 days
The number of participants with adverse events that are related to treatment. Adverse events comprised of cardiac death, Myocardial infarction (MI, classified as Q-wave and non-Q wave), Ischemia-driven target lesion revascularization (TLR) by CABG or PCI.
30 days
Incidence of Ischemia Driven Major Adverse Cardiac Event (MACE)
Time Frame: 1 year
The number of participants with adverse events that are related to treatment. Adverse events comprised of cardiac death, Myocardial infarction (MI, classified as Q-wave and non-Q wave), Ischemia-driven target lesion revascularization (TLR) by CABG or PCI.
1 year
Incidence of Ischemia Driven Major Adverse Cardiac Event (MACE)
Time Frame: 3 year
The number of participants with adverse events that are related to treatment. Adverse events comprised of cardiac death, Myocardial infarction (MI, classified as Q-wave and non-Q wave), Ischemia-driven target lesion revascularization (TLR) by CABG or PCI.
3 year
Incidence of Ischemia Driven Major Adverse Cardiac Event (MACE)
Time Frame: 5 year
The number of participants with adverse events that are related to treatment. Adverse events comprised of cardiac death, Myocardial infarction (MI, classified as Q-wave and non-Q wave), Ischemia-driven target lesion revascularization (TLR) by CABG or PCI.
5 year
In-stent % Angiographic Binary Restenosis (% ABR) Rate
Time Frame: 13 months
Percent of subjects with a follow-up in-stent percent diameter stenosis of ≥ 50% per quantitative coronary angiography (QCA)
13 months
In-segment % Angiographic Binary Restenosis (% ABR) Rate
Time Frame: 13 months
Percent of subjects with a follow-up in-segment percent diameter stenosis of ≥ 50% per quantitative coronary angiography (QCA)
13 months

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Acute Success: Clinical Procedure
Time Frame: 7 days
Successful delivery and deployment of study stent/s @ the intended target lesion and successful withdrawal of the stent delivery system with final residual stenosis < 50%.
7 days
Acute Success: Clinical Device
Time Frame: 7 days
Successful delivery and deployment of 1st implanted study stent/s @ the intended target lesion and successful withdrawal of the stent delivery system with final residual stenosis < 50%.
7 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Shao-Liang Chen, MD, Director of Cardiology and Cath Lab, Nanjing First Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2015

Study Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 2, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 3, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

November 5, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

December 6, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 5, 2017

Last Verified

December 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Coronary Artery Disease

Clinical Trials on Biguard sirolimus-eluting bifurcation stent system

3
Subscribe