Platelet-Rich Plasma Intra-Articular Injection in Treating Hemophilic Arthropathy

August 29, 2020 updated by: Tsung-Ying Li, Tri-Service General Hospital

Severe hemophilia is characterized by frequent and lifelong bleeding, with more than 60% of bleeds occurring into joints . Repeated joint bleeding leads to chronic synovitis, cartilage damage and bony destruction. Currently available treatment of hemophilic arthropathy, such as analgesics, NSAIDs, and hyaluronic acid (HA), are predominantly directed toward the symptomatic relief of pain and inflammation, but they do little to reduce joint cartilage degeneration.

Platelet-Rich Plasma (PRP) is a simple and minimally invasive method that provides a natural concentrate of autologous growth factors from the blood. This method is now being increasingly applied in clinical practice to treat musculoskeletal disorders, such as tendon repairment and osteoarthritis. To the best of our knowledge, no study applies PRP for arthropathy of knee joint in hemophilia patients. The aim of the study is to investigate the efficacy, safety and duration of benefit of single PRP injection versus five weekly intra-articular injections of HA in patients with hemophilic arthropathy of knee.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Severe haemophilia is characterized by frequent and lifelong bleeding, with more than 60% of bleeds occurring into joints. Repeated joint bleeding leads to chronic synovitis, cartilage damage and bony destruction, which are associated with limitation of range of motion (ROM), pain, muscle atrophy, functional impairment, and poor quality of life. The knee, elbow, and ankle are the most commonly involved joints and arthropathy could worsen in adolescence or young adulthood. Hemophilic arthropathy is a multifactorial event and there is evidence to suggest that iron may play a major role with release of cytokines such as Interleukin ( IL)-1, IL-6, and tumour necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) leading to chronic proliferative synovitis, hypervascularity, and progressive arthropathy. These effects on cartilage and subchondral bone are inflammatory and degenerative in nature and management of chronic hemophilic arthropathy is difficult.

Currently available drugs for the treatment of hemophilic arthropathy, such as analgesics, corticosteroids, nonsteroid and steroid anti-inflammatory drugs, and hyaluronic acid (HA), are predominantly directed toward the symptomatic relief of pain and inflammation, but they do little to reduce joint cartilage degeneration.

Platelet Rich Plasma (PRP) is a simple and minimally invasive method that provides a natural concentrate of autologous growth factors from the blood. This method is now being increasingly applied in clinical practice to treat musculoskeletal disorders, such as tendon repairment and osteoarthritis. Growth factors including platelet derived growth factor (PDGF), insulin growth factor (IGF), vascular endothelial growth factor, and transforming growth factor beta-1 are believed to be key components of PRP for structural repair. Although comparing PRP with other intra-articular and soft tissue injections has led to conflicting results, it seems that PRP has useful effects on healing and functional improvement of injured tissues. To the best of our knowledge, only one study applies PRP for arthropathy in haemophilia. Teyssler et al reported PRP could reduce pain of chronic ankle synovitis in hemophilia although the small sample size (n=6), short term follow-up and absence of a control group.

Hyaluronic acid (HA) has some role in joint mechanical support and its metabolic effects, which causes endogenous HA synthesis, stimulation of chondrocyte metabolism, synthesis of cartilage matrix components, and inhibition of chondrodegenerative enzymes, as well as inflammatory process. In 1994 Fernandez-Palazzi et al firstly used intra-articular HA injection for haemophiliacs with arthropathy and reported its beneficial effects in 2002. Recently, Carulli et al reported 27 haemophilic patients with a mean seven-year follow-up who had excellent results in terms of pain relief and functional improvement in the knee following treatment with HA injection. Viscosupplementation is a safe and effective therapeutic strategy in haemophilic arthropathy of knee in order to delay of surgery.

The aim of the study was to investigate the efficacy, safety and duration of benefit of single PRP injection versus five weekly intra-articular injections of HA in patients with haemophilic arthropathy of knee.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

22

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 63 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • hemophilia patients with hemophilic arthropathy of knee joints for at least 6 months
  • painful (VAS ≥ 3) hemophilic arthropathy of knee joints after medication

Exclusion Criteria:

  • presence of joint infections, any surgery on the joint in preceding 12 months
  • intra-articular corticosteroid or HA injection within the past 6 months
  • treatment with systemic steroids
  • history of rheumatoid arthritis, or gouty arthropathy
  • history of chicken or egg allergy
  • presence of neoplasm
  • use of non steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in the 5 days before study
  • platelet values < 100,000/mm3
  • acute hemarthrosis
  • paresis, or recent trauma.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: PRP Group
single intra-articular injection of 2mL PRP (RegentKit-THT-1, RegenLab SA, Mont-sur-Lausanne, Switzerland)
Active Comparator: HA Group
five weekly intra-articular injections of 2.5 mL of hyaluronate sodium (ARTZDispo, Seikagaku Corporation Japan).

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pain (Visual Analogue Scale) and Change From Baseline at 1, 2, 3 &6 Months
Time Frame: baseline, 1 month, 2 months, 3 months, 6 months

The pain intensity will be evaluated subjectively on a visual analogue scale (0-10).

Higher scores mean a worse outcome.

baseline, 1 month, 2 months, 3 months, 6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) From Baseline at 1, 2, 3 &6 Months
Time Frame: baseline, 1 month, 2 months, 3 months, 6 months

It consists of 24 items: five pertaining to pain perception, two to stiffness, and 17 to physical function.

Individual scores were then summed to form a raw score ranging from 0 (best) to 2400 (worst). Finally, WOMAC total score normalized between 0 (best) and 100 (worst).

baseline, 1 month, 2 months, 3 months, 6 months
Short Form-36 (SF-36) From Baseline at 1, 2, 3 &6 Months
Time Frame: baseline, 1 month, 2 months, 3 months, 6 months
The SF-36 is a 36-item assessment tool that measures eight general health concepts including physical functioning, role limitation due to physical health problems, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role limitation due to emotional problems, and mental health. Individual scores were then summed to form a total score ranging from 0 (worst) to 100 (best). Higher scores mean a better outcome.
baseline, 1 month, 2 months, 3 months, 6 months
Ultrasonographic Synovial Thickness (mm) and Change From Baseline at 1, 2, 3 &6 Months
Time Frame: baseline, 1 month, 2 months, 3 months, 6 months
Synovial thickness (mm) by ultrasonography were evaluated from the lateral, middle, and medial aspects of the anterior suprapatellar recess
baseline, 1 month, 2 months, 3 months, 6 months
Synovial Hyperemia (Score) and Change From Baseline at 1, 2, 3 &6 Months
Time Frame: baseline, 1 month, 2 months, 3 months, 6 months
Power Doppler assessment of the selected synovial sites was performed with settings standardized to a pulse repetition frequency of 700 Hz. The power Doppler gain was adjusted to a level just below the disappearance of artifacts under the bony cortex.14,15 The intensity of blood flow in the synovium was scored on a semiquantitative scale from 0-3 (grade 0, no intraarticular colour signal; grade 1, up to 3 color signals or 2 single and 1 confluent signal in the intraarticular area; grade 2, greater than grade 1 to <50% of the intraarticular area filled with color signals; grade 3, ≥50% of the intraarticular area filled with color signals)
baseline, 1 month, 2 months, 3 months, 6 months
Range of Motion (ROM, Degrees) From Baseline at 1, 2, 3 &6 Months
Time Frame: baseline, 1 month, 2 months, 3 months, 6 months
baseline, 1 month, 2 months, 3 months, 6 months
Hemarthrosis From Baseline at 1, 2, 3 &6 Months
Time Frame: baseline, 1 month, 2 months, 3 months, 6 months
Episode(s) of hemarthrosis in the previous one month
baseline, 1 month, 2 months, 3 months, 6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

June 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

July 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 7, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 9, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

November 10, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 17, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 29, 2020

Last Verified

August 1, 2020

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Hemophilia

Clinical Trials on Platelet-Rich Plasma Intra-Articular Injection

3
Subscribe