- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT02601391
An Evaluation of an Adapted STEPPS Group Within Forensic Services (STEPPS-HI)
Adapting the Systems Training and Emotional Predictability and Problem Solving Group (STEPPS) for Service Users With Complex Needs. A Pilot Evaluation of STEPPS High Intensity (STEPPS HI) Within Forensic Inpatient Services
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Systems Training for Emotional Predictability and Problem Solving (STEPPS) is a manualised group programme for people primarily with a diagnosis of Borderline Personality Disorder (BPD). Although, STEPPS groups have been run within prisons in USA, it has been less formally evaluated within forensic psychiatric settings except for Pipon-Young & Cole (2012). Taking the learning from these studies into account, significant adaptations to the current STEPPS manual are needed to increase the acceptability and applicability of the group within forensic settings.
Following the adaption of the STEPPS manual for a forensic inpatient population (STEPPS HI), this research aims to investigate how effective the group is at improving emotional regulation skills in those with identified difficulties in the area as well as whether there is increased acceptability of the adapted group for the participants. The outcome of the research is intended to provide feedback on the adaption of the STEPPS manual and also an evaluation of the revised programme.
Study Type
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
East Sussex
-
Hellingly, East Sussex, United Kingdom, BN20 4ER
- Elizabeth Collins
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- 18 years or older.
- To give informed consent to participate in the study.
- Currently a resident in a low or medium secure unit.
- Has been diagnosed as meeting DSM-IV criteria for a personality disorder at some stage in their mental health history.
- Has identified difficulties with emotional regulation.
- Be willing and have suitable abilities to participate in a group.
- To be assessed by the clinical team as sufficiently psychologically robust to participate in the group and the research.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Psychiatric/psychological or any other difficulties that would mean that participants could not give informed consent.
- Intellectual/cognitive impairment which prohibits participants ability to consent or fully comprehend the study or study materials.
- Non-English speakers as there is no provision for interpreters.
- Unable to manage a group environment due to risk to self and others including bullying and violence (this will be assessed by the clinical and STEPPS-HI facilitation team.
- No evidence of emotional regulation difficulties.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: N/A
- Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Other: STEPPS within forensic services.
Forensic inpatients attend the STEPPS-HI group. Consent will be obtained. Pre and post group psychometric questionnaires will be completed as well as each service user attending a short semi-structured interview following the conclusion of the group . Primary nurse will fill in pre and post group questionnaires. Facilitators will complete short feedback forms each session and attend a focus group upon completion. Psychology Assistants/Interns will collect records of self harm and violence/aggressive incidents for each service user as well as records of nursing observation level and leave status taken. |
This study will focus upon delivering the STEPPs-HI group within Forensic Healthcare Inpatient Services.
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
To assess change from baseline (start of group) on the Symptom Checklist-Revised (SCL-90-R), reassessing at end of group (26 weeks later).
Time Frame: Assess at baseline (start of group) and reassess end of group (26 weeks later)
|
To assess change from baseline (start of group) on the Symptom Checklist-Revised (SCL-90-R), reassessing at end of group (26 weeks later).
|
Assess at baseline (start of group) and reassess end of group (26 weeks later)
|
To assess change from baseline (start of group) on the Zanarini Rating Scale for Borderline Personality Disorder, reassessing at end of group (26 weeks later).
Time Frame: Assess at baseline (start of group) and reassess end of group (26 weeks later)
|
To assess change from baseline (start of group) on the Zanarini Rating Scale
|
Assess at baseline (start of group) and reassess end of group (26 weeks later)
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Modified Overt Aggression Scale (MOAS: Yudofsky, J. M. Silver, W. Jackson, J. Endicott, & D. W. Williams, 1986).
Time Frame: Assess at baseline (start of group) and reassess end of group (26 weeks later)
|
Modified Overt Aggression Scale (MOAS: Yudofsky, J. M. Silver, W. Jackson, J. Endicott, & D. W. Williams, 1986).
|
Assess at baseline (start of group) and reassess end of group (26 weeks later)
|
Circumplex of Interpersonal Relationships in Closed Living Environments (CIRCLE; Blackburn & Renwick, 1996).
Time Frame: Assess at baseline (start of group) and reassess end of group (26 weeks later)
|
Circumplex of Interpersonal Relationships in Closed Living Environments
|
Assess at baseline (start of group) and reassess end of group (26 weeks later)
|
Other Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Number of self-harm incidents as assessed by Sussex Partnership NHS Foundation Trust Incident Reporting System.
Time Frame: A record of self-harm incidents will be collected weekly from one month prior to the group starting, weekly through the group intervention (26 weeks) and then weekly for one month after the group has finished (at 30 weeks).
|
Data will be reviewed via assessing the Sussex Partnership NHS Foundation Trust Incident Reporting System.
Key information will be extracted i.e. number of self-harm incidents within the time frames stated in the time frame section.
An excel spread sheet to collect this information will be developed by the study's principal investigator and the data will be inputted into the spread sheet by the Psychology Interns.
Data analysis (a paired-samples t-test) will be conducted to compare the mean rates of self-harm incidents pre-group and post group.
|
A record of self-harm incidents will be collected weekly from one month prior to the group starting, weekly through the group intervention (26 weeks) and then weekly for one month after the group has finished (at 30 weeks).
|
Number of violent incidents as assessed by Sussex Partnership NHS Foundation Trust Incident Reporting System.
Time Frame: A record of violent incidents will be collected weekly from one month prior to the group starting, weekly through the group intervention (26 weeks) and then weekly for one month after the group has finished (at 30 weeks).
|
Data will be reviewed via assessing the Sussex Partnership NHS Foundation Trust Incident Reporting System.
Key information will be extracted i.e. number of violent incidents within the time frames stated in the time frame section.
An excel spread sheet to collect this information will be developed by the study's principal investigator and the data will be inputted into the spread sheet by the Psychology Interns.
Data analysis (a paired-samples t-test) will be conducted to compare the mean rates of violent incidents pre-group and post group.
|
A record of violent incidents will be collected weekly from one month prior to the group starting, weekly through the group intervention (26 weeks) and then weekly for one month after the group has finished (at 30 weeks).
|
Assessing research participants (service users) views regarding group content, via attendance at a semi-structured interview utilising thematic analysis to analyse the data gathered (Braun & Clarke, 2006).
Time Frame: This will be completed at the end of the group intervention (26 weeks) with service users being invited to attend a semi-structured interview.
|
Research participants will be invited to attend a 1-1 semi-structured interview to capture their views on group content, format, structure, process, non-attendance and drop-put rates.
The qualitative data gathered will be analysed by the principal investigator using thematic analysis (Braun & Clarke, 2006).
|
This will be completed at the end of the group intervention (26 weeks) with service users being invited to attend a semi-structured interview.
|
Assessing research participants (group facilitators) views of the adapted group manual via attendance at a focus group, utilising thematic analysis to analyse the data gathered (Braun & Clarke, 2006).
Time Frame: This will be completed at the end of the group intervention (26 weeks) with group facilitators being invited to attend a focus group.
|
Research participants will be invited to attend a focus group to capture overall views on the adapted manual.
The qualitative data gathered will be analysed by the principal investigator using thematic analysis (Braun & Clarke, 2006).
|
This will be completed at the end of the group intervention (26 weeks) with group facilitators being invited to attend a focus group.
|
Record of research participants (service users) observational levels as assessed by Sussex Partnership NHS Foundation Trust general, intermittent and within eyesight recording forms.
Time Frame: A record of observational level forms (general, intermittent and within eyesight) will be collected weekly from one month prior to group starting, weekly through group intervention (26 weeks) and then weekly for one month after the group has finished (at
|
Data will be reviewed via assessing the Sussex Partnership NHS Foundation Trust record of observational level forms (general, intermittent and within eyesight).
Key information will be extracted i.e. changes within observational levels in the time frames stated in the time frame section.
An excel spread sheet to collect this information will be developed by the study's principal investigator and the data will be inputted into the spread sheet by the Psychology Interns.
The data gathered will be reported in the demographic section of the result within the journal article developed to disseminate the outcomes of the study.
|
A record of observational level forms (general, intermittent and within eyesight) will be collected weekly from one month prior to group starting, weekly through group intervention (26 weeks) and then weekly for one month after the group has finished (at
|
Record of leave status for each research participants (service user) as assessed by Sussex Partnership NHS Foundation Trust Mental Health Act 1983 - Section 17 Leave of Absence Forms.
Time Frame: A record of leave status will be collected weekly from one month prior to group starting, weekly through group intervention (26 weeks) and then weekly for one month after the group has finished (at 30 weeks).
|
Data will be reviewed via assessing Sussex Partnership NHS Foundation Trust Mental Health Act 1983 - Section 17 Leave of Absence Forms for each research participant.
Key information will be extracted i.e. changes within level status in the time frames stated in the time frame section.
An excel spread sheet to collect this information will be developed by the study's principal investigator and the data will be inputted into the spread sheet by the Psychology Interns.
The data gathered will be reported in the demographic section of the result within the journal article developed to disseminate the outcomes of the study.
|
A record of leave status will be collected weekly from one month prior to group starting, weekly through group intervention (26 weeks) and then weekly for one month after the group has finished (at 30 weeks).
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Elizabeth R Collins, Sussex Partnership NHS Foundation Trust
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Black DW, Blum N, McCormick B, Allen J. Systems Training for Emotional Predictability and Problem Solving (STEPPS) group treatment for offenders with borderline personality disorder. J Nerv Ment Dis. 2013 Feb;201(2):124-9. doi: 10.1097/NMD.0b013e31827f6435.
- Blackburn, R., & Renwick, S. J. (1996). Rating scales for measuring the interpersonal circle in forensic psychiatric patients. Psychological Assessment, 8, 76-84
- Blum, N., Bartels N., St. John, D., Pfohl, B. (2002). STEPPS: Systems Training for Emotional Predictability and Problem Solving: Group Treatment for Borderline Personality Disorder. Coralville, Iowa, Blum's Books.
- Braun, V. & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3, 77 - 101.
- Connell, J. & Barkham, M. (2007). Core-10 User Manual, Version 1.1. Core System Trust & Core Information Management Systems Ltd.
- Dickinson T, Wright KM. Stress and burnout in forensic mental health nursing: a literature review. Br J Nurs. 2008 Jan 24-Feb 13;17(2):82-7. doi: 10.12968/bjon.2008.17.2.28133.
- Gratz, K. L. & Roemer, E. (2004). Multidimensional assessment of emotion regulation and dysregulation: Development, factor structure, and initial validation of the difficulties in emotion regulation scale. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 26, 41-54.
- Harvey R, Black DW, Blum N (2010) STEPPS (Systems Training for Emotional Predictability and Problem Solving) in the United Kingdom: A preliminary report. Journal of Contemporary Psychotherapy. 40, 225-232.
- Pipon-Young, L., & Cole, S. (2012). A preliminary evaluation of the Systems Training for Emotional Predictability and Problem Solving (STEPPS) group in a women's forensic medium secure unit. Clinical Psychology Forum, 239, 35 - 39.
- Sarkar, J., & di Lustro, M. (2011). Evolution of secure services for women in England. Advances in Psychiatric Treatment, 17, 323-331.
- Yudofsky SC, Silver JM, Jackson W, Endicott J, Williams D. The Overt Aggression Scale for the objective rating of verbal and physical aggression. Am J Psychiatry. 1986 Jan;143(1):35-9. doi: 10.1176/ajp.143.1.35.
- Zanarini MC, Vujanovic AA, Parachini EA, Boulanger JL, Frankenburg FR, Hennen J. Zanarini Rating Scale for Borderline Personality Disorder (ZAN-BPD): a continuous measure of DSM-IV borderline psychopathology. J Pers Disord. 2003 Jun;17(3):233-42. doi: 10.1521/pedi.17.3.233.22147. Erratum In: J Personal Disord. 2003 Aug;17(4):1 p following 369.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimate)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- SPFT-1
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Personality Disorder
-
NHS Greater Glasgow and ClydeUnknownBorderline Personality Disorder (BPD) | Antisocial Personality Disorder (ASPD)United Kingdom
-
Norwegian University of Science and TechnologyCompletedPersonality Disorder, Borderline | Avoidant Personality DisorderNorway
-
Health Service Executive, IrelandCompletedPersonality Disorder, Borderline
-
University Hospital, Basel, SwitzerlandLeading House for the Latin American Region (Seed Money Grant SMG 1730)WithdrawnBorderline Personality Disorder (BPD)
-
University of RegensburgCompletedDepression | Personality Disorder, Borderline | Personality Disorder; UnstableGermany
-
Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron Research InstituteUnknownBorderline Personality Disorder.Spain
-
Silvia Elisa Hurtado SantiagoCompletedPersonality Disorder, BorderlineSpain
-
Health Service Executive, IrelandCompletedPersonality Disorder, Borderline
-
Universitat Jaume IHospital de la RiberaNot yet recruitingBorderline Personality Disorder (BPD)Spain
-
University of OldenburgProf. René Hurlemann; Jella Voelter, M.Sc.RecruitingBorderline Personality Disorder (BPD)Germany