Effect of Smartphone App on Activity

November 20, 2015 updated by: Irit HOCHBERG MD, Rambam Health Care Campus

The Effect of a Smartphone Application for Encouraging Physical Activity on the Amount of Activity Performed by Patients With Diabetes or Hematological Malignancies

A smartphone app will be installed on smartphones of patients with type 2 diabetes or hematologic malignancies that do not exercise. The app will send SMS messages to encourage exercise. The exercise will be quantified by the smartphone accelerometer and clinical data, including HbA1c will be collected.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The aim of the study is to increase patients' physical activities by using a dedicated cellular application that will encourage patients to adhere to their doctor recommendation on a personal basis.

Primary outcome In diabetic patients: measuring an increase in daily physical activity In cancer patients: improvement of quality of life in correlation with the level of physical activity

Secondary outcomes In diabetic patients: improved glycemic control as assessed by sequential blood tests for HbA1c.

The patients will fill quality of life questionnaires (SF36) at recruitment and after 6 months. After 6 months the patients will also fill a questionnaire about their experience of using the app.

Each recruited patient will have an Android based smart phone. Each patient will provide:

  1. Approval to join the experiment
  2. Age, gender, height
  3. Telephone number (for SMS)

Length of intervention - at least 6 months per patient. Each patient will be randomly assigned into one of two groups, which will specify feedback relative to himself or to others or a weekly reminder to exercise.

Number of patients:

  1. Diabetes: 150 patients, of which 50 are controls.
  2. Cancer: 100 patients, of which 20 are controls. All patients will receive instruction about the importance of physical activity and a personal recommendation for activity level, n sessions of activity per week, and time span per session (i.e., at least 2 hours of walking per week divided to 3 walking sessions per week) Patients in the treatment arms will receive at least n (number of commended sessions) messages per week of positive feedback if activity performed or negative feedback if not performed. At the chosen day each week the patient will receive a summary of the exercise for all the week.

Feedback Possible feedback

(NOTE - these the the actual feedback messages that the participants will receive, and are therefore in the second person):

  1. Negative feedback: "You need to exercise to reach your activity goals. Please remember to exercise tomorrow".
  2. Positive feedback:

    1. Relative to self: "You're exercise level is higher than last week. Keep up the good work"
    2. Relative to others: "You're exercising more than the average person. Keep up the good work"
  3. Control arm: "Did you remember to exercise?"

Technical requirements

  1. App - will collect physical activity and send it to a server. App will run in background without need to restart on reboot.
  2. Server - Collects physical activity

Feedback policies The experiment will have two phases of feedback. Phase 1

The investigators begin with no data, so the policy at this stage is as follows:

  1. Positive feedback will be sent each day if user has surpassed 1/7th of weekly activity that day.
  2. Negative feedback will be sent every 3 days, if activity hasn't passed 1/7th of activity.

Each day, with a probability of 0.2, a random decision on feedback will be made.

This phase will last approximately 4 weeks. Phase 2 Using a learning algorithm (see below) the computer will adjust the feedback, and decide daily on the feedback (positive \ negative \ none).

Policy learning The investigators will start with a simple policy learning strategy, and later use more sophisticated methods that will have a state-space representation of the user.

The initial algorithm will represent each user at each day using the following attributes:

  1. Demographics (age and gender)
  2. Expected versus actual activity level this week (ratio of the two)
  3. Last feedback given (positive \ negative)
  4. Day of the week (we will use week-long cycles). The goal of the algorithm is to give feedback today so as to encourage activity tomorrow.

When training the algorithm, the computer will have a feature vector comprising of the attributes above, and a matrix of actions (for day t). The output to be predicted is whether the activity level on the following day (t+1).

There can be two types of feedback depending on weekly and daily behaviors:

Weekly goal Not achieved Achieved Daily goal (on day (t+1)) Not achieved 1 1+alpha Achieved 1+alpha 1 (alpha>0) The algorithm will pay a higher penalty if, for example, on a given day the message encouraged activity, but the weekly goal was not achieved compared to if it was.

For simplicity, the initial learning algorithm will be linear, until enough data is collected. That is, given a matrix:

X = (demographics, expected vs. actual activity, last feedback, day of the week, actions) And a vector showing the amount of activity on the following day, weighted as in the table above, denoted by Y, we will learn a vector of weights w such that: X * w = Y.

In phase 2 of the project the computer will use other learning algorithms. Exploration (random action at a given day) will continue throughout both phases at the same level.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

270

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 90 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Age over 18.
  2. Diagnosis of diabetes type 2 with HbA1c over 6.5% and no regular exercise for arm A.
  3. Newly diagnosed lymphoma, CLL or MM which require chemotherapy for arm B.
  4. Patients in both arms should hold an android based smartphone.
  5. Patients must be able to read Hebrew.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Unable to legally consent
  2. unstable or stable angina pectoris

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Learning algorithm
The app will be installed on the patients's phone. The app will measure the amount of activity performed. THE INTERVENTION IS THAT the Patients will receive daily messages, a learning algorithm will study the exercise response to each type of message and personalize the best message sequence for each patient.
THIS INTERVENTION HAS BEEN INCLUDED IN THE LEARNING ALGORITHM ARM The app measures physical activity by the phone accelerometer and sends SMS messages to encourage activity. An automatic learning algorithm for encouraging physical activity learns the patterns of response for each patient and chooses the best messages for the patient to encourage activity.
Active Comparator: control
The app will be installed on the patients's phone. The app will measure the amount of activity performed. THE INTERVENTION IS THAT THE Patients will receive a weekly reminder to exercise.
THIS INTERVENTION HAS BEEN INCLUDED IN THE CONTROL ARM The app measures physical activity by the phone accelerometer and sends a constant SMS messages to remind the patient to exercise.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
increase in daily physical activity
Time Frame: 6 months
The app records the amount of daily walking using the smartphone accelerometer. The amount of activity and pace of walking is compared to those performed on previous days.
6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
glycemic control
Time Frame: 6 months
HbA1c will be measured before recruitment and every 3 months during participation. The HbA1c during participation will be compared to the starting HbA1c to assess whether there was improvement in glycemic control as quantified by HbA1c.
6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

July 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

July 1, 2017

Study Completion (Anticipated)

July 1, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 17, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 20, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

November 23, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

November 23, 2015

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 20, 2015

Last Verified

November 1, 2015

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Hematologic Malignancy

Clinical Trials on messages generated by learning algorithm

3
Subscribe