A Phase 1 Study To Evaluate Escalating Doses Of A Vaccine-Based Immunotherapy Regimen For Prostate Cancer (PrCa VBIR)

January 18, 2023 updated by: Pfizer

A PHASE 1 STUDY TO EVALUATE THE SAFETY, PHARMACOKINETICS AND PHARMACODYNAMICS OF ESCALATING DOSES OF A VACCINE-BASED IMMUNOTHERAPY REGIMEN (VBIR) FOR PROSTATE CANCER (PF-06753512)

The study will evaluate the safety, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of increasing doses of a vaccine-based immunotherapy regimen for patients with prostate cancer.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

91

Phase

  • Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Arizona
      • Tucson, Arizona, United States, 85719
        • The University of Arizona Cancer Center-North Campus
      • Tucson, Arizona, United States, 85719
        • Banner-University Medical Center Tucson
    • Connecticut
      • New Haven, Connecticut, United States, 06511
        • Smilow Cancer Hospital Phase 1 Unit
      • New Haven, Connecticut, United States, 06510
        • Smilow Cancer Hospital at Yale-New Haven
    • Maryland
      • Bethesda, Maryland, United States, 20892
        • National Institutes of Health Clinical Center
    • Nebraska
      • Omaha, Nebraska, United States, 68130
        • GU Research Network
    • Nevada
      • Las Vegas, Nevada, United States, 89169
        • Comprehensive Cancer Centers of Nevada
    • New Jersey
      • Morristown, New Jersey, United States, 07960
        • Morristown Medical Center
      • Morristown, New Jersey, United States, 07960
        • Garden State Urology
      • Rockaway, New Jersey, United States, 07866
        • Garden State Urology
      • Whippany, New Jersey, United States, 07981
        • Garden State Urology
    • New York
      • Lake Success, New York, United States, 11042
        • Northwell Health
      • New York, New York, United States, 10065
        • Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
      • New York, New York, United States, 10022
        • Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center 53rd Street
      • New York, New York, United States, 10065
        • Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, Sidney Kimmel Center
    • North Carolina
      • Durham, North Carolina, United States, 27710
        • Duke University Medical Center
    • Pennsylvania
      • Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States, 15232
        • UPMC Hillman Cancer Center
    • Washington
      • Seattle, Washington, United States, 98109
        • Seattle Cancer Care Alliance
      • Seattle, Washington, United States, 98195
        • University of Washington Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Histological or cytological diagnosis of prostate cancer
  • Adequate bone marrow, kidney and liver function
  • Hormone sensitive relapsing prostate cancer after definitive local therapy (biochemical relapse) OR
  • Failed prior therapy with a novel hormone (e.g. enzalutamide, abiraterone) with documented progressive disease (post-novel hormone therapy CRPC)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • ECOG performance status greater than or equal to 2
  • Concurrent immunotherapy for prostate cancer
  • History of or active autoimmune disorders (including but not limited to: myasthenia gravis, thyroiditis, pneumonitis, rheumatoid arthritis, multiple sclerosis, systemic lupus erythematosus, scleroderma) and other conditions that disorganize or alter the immune system.
  • History of inflammatory bowel disease.
  • Current use of any implanted electronic stimulation device
  • For biochemically relapsed patients, no concurrent use of ADT or orchiectomy and no known prior or current evidence of any metastatic involvement of distant organs
  • For post-novel hormone patients, no concurrent treatment with a secondary hormone (e.g. enzalutamide, abiraterone), no metastasis to the liver or brain

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Sequential Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Dose Escalation
PF-06753512
PF-06755992 will be administered on Day 1 of Cycles 1 and 2.
Other Names:
  • AdC68
PF-06755990 will be administered using a device on Day 29, 57 and 85 of each cycle.
Other Names:
  • pDNA
TDS-IM electroporation device and associated supplies will be used for PF-06755990 administration
PF-06753388 will be administered every 28 days.
Other Names:
  • PF-06753388
PF-06801591 will be administered every 28 days.
Combination of adenovirus (AdC68) + plasmid DNA (pDNA) + tremelimumab
Other Names:
  • VBIR-1 or PrCa VBIR

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
Time Frame: Baseline up to 6 months after End of Treatment (EOT; 52 months in maximum)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation where participant administered a product; the event did not need to have a causal relationship with the treatment. A SAE was any untoward medical occurrence at any dose that resulted in death; was life threatening; required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity; resulted in congenital anomaly/birth defect. AEs included both SAEs and non-serious AEs.
Baseline up to 6 months after End of Treatment (EOT; 52 months in maximum)
Number of Participants With AEs as Graded by National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events Version 4.03 (NCI CTCAE v4.03) (Grade >= 3)
Time Frame: Baseline up to 6 months after EOT (52 months in maximum)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation participant administered a product; the event did not need to have a causal relationship with the treatment. Grades of AEs were defined by NCI CTCAE v 4.03. Grade 1=asymptomatic/mild symptoms, clinical or diagnostic observations only, intervention not indicated; Grade 2=minimal, local or noninvasive intervention indicated, limiting age-appropriate instrumental activity of daily living (ADL); Grade 3=severe or medically significant but not immediately life-threatening, hospitalization of prolongation of hospitalization indicated; disabling limiting self-care ADL; Grade 4=events with life-threatening consequences, urgent intervention indicated; Grade 5= death related to AE. Treatment-emergent adverse events occurred between first dose of study drug and up to 28 days after last dose that were absent before treatment or that worsened relative to pretreatment state.
Baseline up to 6 months after EOT (52 months in maximum)
Number of Participants With AEs Leading to Discontinuation or Dose Reduction
Time Frame: Baseline up to 6 months after EOT (52 months in maximum)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation where participant administered a product; the event did not need to have a causal relationship with the treatment.
Baseline up to 6 months after EOT (52 months in maximum)
Number of Participants With Dose-Limiting Toxicities (DLTs)
Time Frame: The first 28 days following the first AdC68 vaccination (on Cycle 1 Day 1)
The following AEs occurring in the first 28 days following the first AdC68 vaccination and not related to disease/progression were DLTs: (a) hematologic (Cohorts 1A to 3A and Cohorts 6A to 9A): Grade 3 neutropenia lasting >7 days, febrile neutropenia, Grade >=3 neutropenic infection, Grade >=3 thrombocytopenia, Grade >=3 anemia lasting >7 days, Grade >=3 lymphopenia lasting >14 days; (b) non-hematologic (all cohorts): Grade >=3 laboratory abnormalities either associated with symptoms or associated with worsening of an existing condition or that suggested a new disease process or that required additional active management, Grade >=3 toxicities, Grade 3 flu like symptoms lasting >3 days, fever of >40.0 degree Celsius lasting >3 days. Other clinically important or persistent toxicities at discretion of investigator and Pfizer.
The first 28 days following the first AdC68 vaccination (on Cycle 1 Day 1)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology (Grade 3 or 4)
Time Frame: Baseline up to 6 months after EOT (52 months in maximum)
Laboratory abnormalities were graded per NCI CTCAE version 4.03 (Grade 3: severe AE; Grade 4: life-threatening consequences, urgent intervention indicated) and those with at least 1 participant are presented here. Hematology parameters included hemoglobin, platelets, white blood cell count, neutrophils, eosinophils, monocytes, basophils and lymphocytes.
Baseline up to 6 months after EOT (52 months in maximum)
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Chemistry (Grade 3 or 4)
Time Frame: Baseline up to 6 months after EOT (52 months in maximum)
Laboratory abnormalities were graded per NCI CTCAE version 4.03 (Grade 3: severe AE; Grade 4: life-threatening consequences, urgent intervention indicated) and those with at least 1 participant are presented here. Chemistry parameters included aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase, alkaline phosphatase, sodium, potassium, magnesium, chloride, total calcium, total bilirubin, blood urea nitrogen (or urea), creatinine, uric acid, glucose, albumin, phosphorous or phosphate, lactate dehydrogenase, lipase, bicarbonate or carbon dioxide, total protein, TSH (if abnormal, reflex free T4 and free T3).
Baseline up to 6 months after EOT (52 months in maximum)
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Urinalysis (Grade 3 or 4)
Time Frame: Baseline up to 6 months after EOT (52 months in maximum)
Laboratory abnormalities were graded per NCI CTCAE version 4.03 (Grade 3: severe AE; Grade 4: life-threatening consequences, urgent intervention indicated) and those with at least 1 participant are presented here. Urine parameters included urine protein and urine blood.
Baseline up to 6 months after EOT (52 months in maximum)
Change From Baseline in T Cell Response to Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) in Part A
Time Frame: At screening; Cycle 1: at Day 1, Day 15, Day 29, Day 43, Day 71; Cycle 2: at Day 1, Day 29, and Day 99; at the EOT visit, and 2, 4 and 6 months after EOT.
T cell response to PSA was determined by assaying peripheral blood mononuclear cell (PBMC) samples for cellular immune responses against PSA antigens and was determined as the frequency of interferon-gamma (IFN-γ) spot forming cells (SFC)/million PBMCs. Change from baseline at Cycle 1 Day 71 and at Cycle 2 Day 99 are presented here.
At screening; Cycle 1: at Day 1, Day 15, Day 29, Day 43, Day 71; Cycle 2: at Day 1, Day 29, and Day 99; at the EOT visit, and 2, 4 and 6 months after EOT.
Change From Baseline in T Cell Response to Prostate Stem Cell Antigen (PSCA) in Part A
Time Frame: At screening; Cycle 1: at Day 1, Day 15, Day 29, Day 43, Day 71; Cycle 2: at Day 1, Day 29, and Day 99; at the EOT visit, and 2, 4 and 6 months after EOT.
T cell response to PSCA was determined by assaying PBMC samples for cellular immune responses against PSCA antigens and was determined as the frequency of IFN-γ SFC/million PBMCs. Change from baseline at Cycle 1 Day 71 and at Cycle 2 Day 99 are presented here.
At screening; Cycle 1: at Day 1, Day 15, Day 29, Day 43, Day 71; Cycle 2: at Day 1, Day 29, and Day 99; at the EOT visit, and 2, 4 and 6 months after EOT.
Change From Baseline in T Cell Response to Prostate Specific Membrane Antigen (PSMA) in Part A
Time Frame: At screening; Cycle 1: at Day 1, Day 15, Day 29, Day 43, Day 71; Cycle 2: at Day 1, Day 29, and Day 99; at the EOT visit, and 2, 4 and 6 months after EOT.
T cell response to PSMA was determined by assaying PBMC samples for cellular immune responses against PSMA antigens and was determined as the frequency of IFN-γ SFC/million PBMCs. Change from baseline at Cycle 1 Day 71 and at Cycle 2 Day 99 are presented here.
At screening; Cycle 1: at Day 1, Day 15, Day 29, Day 43, Day 71; Cycle 2: at Day 1, Day 29, and Day 99; at the EOT visit, and 2, 4 and 6 months after EOT.
Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Tremelimumab in Part A
Time Frame: Cycle 1: at Day 1 pre-dose, any time between 48 to 120 hr, approximately 168 hr, 336 hr, and 504 hr, at pre-dose on Day 29, Day 57, and Day 85; Cycle 2: at pre-dose on Day 1 and Day 29; at EOT visit, and 2, 4 and 6 months after EOT.
Cmax was defined as the maximum observed plasma concentration. Blood samples (approximately 3 mL whole blood) to provide at least 1 mL of serum for measurement of tremelimumab PK analysis were collected.
Cycle 1: at Day 1 pre-dose, any time between 48 to 120 hr, approximately 168 hr, 336 hr, and 504 hr, at pre-dose on Day 29, Day 57, and Day 85; Cycle 2: at pre-dose on Day 1 and Day 29; at EOT visit, and 2, 4 and 6 months after EOT.
Time to Reach Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of Tremelimumab in Part A
Time Frame: Cycle 1: at Day 1 pre-dose, any time between 48 to 120 hr, approximately 168 hr, 336 hr, and 504 hr, at pre-dose on Day 29, Day 57, and Day 85; Cycle 2: at pre-dose on Day 1 and Day 29; at EOT visit, and 2, 4 and 6 months after EOT.
Tmax was defined as the time to reach maximum observed plasma concentration. Blood samples (approximately 3 mL whole blood) to provide at least 1 mL of serum for measurement of tremelimumab PK analysis were collected.
Cycle 1: at Day 1 pre-dose, any time between 48 to 120 hr, approximately 168 hr, 336 hr, and 504 hr, at pre-dose on Day 29, Day 57, and Day 85; Cycle 2: at pre-dose on Day 1 and Day 29; at EOT visit, and 2, 4 and 6 months after EOT.
Area Under the Curve From Time Zero to Last Quantifiable Concentration (AUClast) of Tremelimumab in Part A
Time Frame: Cycle 1: at Day 1 pre-dose, any time between 48 to 120 hr, approximately 168 hr, 336 hr, and 504 hr, at pre-dose on Day 29, Day 57, and Day 85; Cycle 2: at pre-dose on Day 1 and Day 29; at EOT visit, and 2, 4 and 6 months after EOT.
AUClast was defined as the area under the curve from time zero to last quantifiable concentration. Blood samples (approximately 3 mL whole blood) to provide at least 1 mL of serum for measurement of tremelimumab PK analysis were collected.
Cycle 1: at Day 1 pre-dose, any time between 48 to 120 hr, approximately 168 hr, 336 hr, and 504 hr, at pre-dose on Day 29, Day 57, and Day 85; Cycle 2: at pre-dose on Day 1 and Day 29; at EOT visit, and 2, 4 and 6 months after EOT.
Trough Concentrations (Ctrough) After Multiple Dosing of Tremelimumab
Time Frame: Pre-dose on Cycle 2 Day 1
Pre-dose tremelimumab concentration on Cycle 2 Day 1 is presented here as Ctrough. Blood samples (approximately 3 mL whole blood) to provide at least 1 mL of serum for measurement of tremelimumab PK analysis were collected. Summary statistics of Ctrough were not calculated if number of observations above lower lit of quantification (NALQ)=0 or <=3 participants had non-missing data.
Pre-dose on Cycle 2 Day 1
Cmax of PF-06801591 in Part A
Time Frame: Cycle 1: at Day 1 pre-dose, any time between 48 to 120 hr, approximately 168 hr, 336 hr, and 504 hr, at pre-dose on Day 29, Day 57, and Day 85; Cycle 2: at pre-dose on Day 1 and Day 29; at EOT visit, and 2, 4 and 6 months after EOT.
Cmax was defined as the maximum observed plasma concentration. Blood samples (approximately 5 mL) to provide serum for the analysis of PF-06801591 concentrations were collected.
Cycle 1: at Day 1 pre-dose, any time between 48 to 120 hr, approximately 168 hr, 336 hr, and 504 hr, at pre-dose on Day 29, Day 57, and Day 85; Cycle 2: at pre-dose on Day 1 and Day 29; at EOT visit, and 2, 4 and 6 months after EOT.
Tmax of PF-06801591 in Part A
Time Frame: Cycle 1: at Day 1 pre-dose, any time between 48 to 120 hr, approximately 168 hr, 336 hr, and 504 hr, at pre-dose on Day 29, Day 57, and Day 85; Cycle 2: at pre-dose on Day 1 and Day 29; at EOT visit, and 2, 4 and 6 months after EOT.
Tmax was defined as the time at which Cmax occurred. Blood samples (approximately 5 mL) to provide serum for the analysis of PF- 06801591 concentrations were collected.
Cycle 1: at Day 1 pre-dose, any time between 48 to 120 hr, approximately 168 hr, 336 hr, and 504 hr, at pre-dose on Day 29, Day 57, and Day 85; Cycle 2: at pre-dose on Day 1 and Day 29; at EOT visit, and 2, 4 and 6 months after EOT.
AUClast of PF-06801591 in Part A
Time Frame: Cycle 1: at Day 1 pre-dose, any time between 48 to 120 hr, approximately 168 hr, 336 hr, and 504 hr, at pre-dose on Day 29, Day 57, and Day 85; Cycle 2: at pre-dose on Day 1 and Day 29; at EOT visit, and 2, 4 and 6 months after EOT.
AUClast was defined as the area under the curve from time zero to last quantifiable concentration. Blood samples (approximately 5 mL) to provide serum for the analysis of PF-06801591 concentrations were collected. The geometric mean and geometric coefficient of variation of AUClast for Cohort 9A were not presented because fewer than 3 participants had reportable parameter values.
Cycle 1: at Day 1 pre-dose, any time between 48 to 120 hr, approximately 168 hr, 336 hr, and 504 hr, at pre-dose on Day 29, Day 57, and Day 85; Cycle 2: at pre-dose on Day 1 and Day 29; at EOT visit, and 2, 4 and 6 months after EOT.
Ctrough of PF-06801591
Time Frame: Pre-dose on Cycle 2 Day 1
Pre-dose PF-06801591 concentration on Cycle 2 Day 1 is presented here as Ctrough. Blood samples (approximately 3 mL whole blood) to provide at least 1 mL of serum for measurement of PF-06801591 PK analysis were collected.
Pre-dose on Cycle 2 Day 1
Number of Participants With Anti-Drug Antibody (ADA) Against Tremelimumab
Time Frame: Cycle 1: at Day 1, Day 29, and Day 85; Cycle 2: at Day 29; at the EOT visit, and 2, 4 and 6 months after EOT. Samples collected on dosing days were obtained within 6 hours prior to tremelimumab dosing.
Blood samples (approximately 5 mL) to provide at least 1 mL of serum to detect ADA were collected from participants enrolled in to Cohorts 3A to 9A and Cohorts 1B to 5B. Participants were considered ADA-positive if sample titer (log10) >=1.48; participants were considered ADA-negative if sample titer (log10) <1.48.
Cycle 1: at Day 1, Day 29, and Day 85; Cycle 2: at Day 29; at the EOT visit, and 2, 4 and 6 months after EOT. Samples collected on dosing days were obtained within 6 hours prior to tremelimumab dosing.
Titer of Treatment-Induced ADA Against Tremelimumab
Time Frame: Cycle 1: at Day 1, Day 29, and Day 85; Cycle 2: at Day 29; at the EOT visit, and 2, 4 and 6 months after EOT. Samples collected on dosing days were obtained within 6 hours prior to tremelimumab dosing.
Treatment-induced ADA was defined as baseline titer missing or negative and participant had >=1 post-treatment positive titer. Blood samples (approximately 5 mL) to provide at least 1 mL of serum to detect ADA were collected from participants enrolled in to Cohorts 3A to 9A and Cohorts 1B to 5B.
Cycle 1: at Day 1, Day 29, and Day 85; Cycle 2: at Day 29; at the EOT visit, and 2, 4 and 6 months after EOT. Samples collected on dosing days were obtained within 6 hours prior to tremelimumab dosing.
Number of Participants With Neutralizing Antibody (NAb) Against Tremelimumab
Time Frame: Cycle 1: at Day 1, Day 29, and Day 85; Cycle 2: at Day 29; at the EOT visit, and 2, 4 and 6 months after EOT. Samples collected on dosing days were obtained within 6 hours prior to tremelimumab dosing.
Only those samples tested positive for ADA were to be further tested for Nab. Blood samples (approximately 5 mL) to provide at least 1 mL of serum to detect NAb were collected from participants enrolled in to Cohorts 3A to 9A and Cohorts 1B to 5B. Nab against tremelimumab was not examined due to business reason.
Cycle 1: at Day 1, Day 29, and Day 85; Cycle 2: at Day 29; at the EOT visit, and 2, 4 and 6 months after EOT. Samples collected on dosing days were obtained within 6 hours prior to tremelimumab dosing.
Titer of Treatment-Induced NAb Against Tremelimumab
Time Frame: Cycle 1: at Day 1, Day 29, and Day 85; Cycle 2: at Day 29; at the EOT visit, and 2, 4 and 6 months after EOT. Samples collected on dosing days were obtained within 6 hours prior to tremelimumab dosing.
Only those samples tested positive for ADA were to be further tested for Nab. Blood samples (approximately 5 mL) to provide at least 1 mL of serum to detect NAb were collected from participants enrolled in to Cohorts 3A to 9A and Cohorts 1B to 5B. Nab against tremelimumab was not examined due to business reason.
Cycle 1: at Day 1, Day 29, and Day 85; Cycle 2: at Day 29; at the EOT visit, and 2, 4 and 6 months after EOT. Samples collected on dosing days were obtained within 6 hours prior to tremelimumab dosing.
Number of Participants With ADA Against PF-06801591
Time Frame: Cycle 1: at Day 1, Day 29, and Day 85; Cycle 2: at Day 29; at the EOT visit, and 2, 4 and 6 months after EOT. Samples collected on dosing days were obtained within 6 hours prior to PF-06801591 dosing.
Participants were considered ADA-positive if sample titer (log10) >=99; Participants were considered ADA-negative if sample titer (log10) <99. Blood samples (approximately 5 mL) to provide at least 1 mL of serum for detection of ADA against PF-06801591 were collected from participants enrolled in Cohorts 6A to 9A and Cohorts 3B and 5B.
Cycle 1: at Day 1, Day 29, and Day 85; Cycle 2: at Day 29; at the EOT visit, and 2, 4 and 6 months after EOT. Samples collected on dosing days were obtained within 6 hours prior to PF-06801591 dosing.
Titer of Treatment-Induced ADA Against PF-06801591
Time Frame: Cycle 1: at Day 1, Day 29, and Day 85; Cycle 2: at Day 29; at the EOT visit, and 2, 4 and 6 months after EOT. Samples collected on dosing days were obtained within 6 hours prior to PF-06801591 dosing.
Treatment-induced ADA was defined as baseline titer missing or negative and participant had >=1 post-treatment positive titer. Blood samples (approximately 5 mL) to provide at least 1 mL of serum for detection of ADA against PF-06801591 were collected from participants enrolled in Cohorts 6A to 9A and Cohorts 3B and 5B.
Cycle 1: at Day 1, Day 29, and Day 85; Cycle 2: at Day 29; at the EOT visit, and 2, 4 and 6 months after EOT. Samples collected on dosing days were obtained within 6 hours prior to PF-06801591 dosing.
Number of Participants With NAb Against PF-06801591
Time Frame: Cycle 1: at Day 1, Day 29, and Day 85; Cycle 2: at Day 29; at the EOT visit, and 2, 4 and 6 months after EOT. Samples collected on dosing days were obtained within 6 hours prior to PF-06801591 dosing.
Only those samples tested positive for ADA were to be further tested for Nab. Blood samples (approximately 5 mL) to provide at least 1 mL of serum for detection of NAb against PF-06801591 were collected from participants enrolled in Cohorts 6A to 9A and Cohorts 3B and 5B. Nab against PF-06801591 was not examined due to business reason.
Cycle 1: at Day 1, Day 29, and Day 85; Cycle 2: at Day 29; at the EOT visit, and 2, 4 and 6 months after EOT. Samples collected on dosing days were obtained within 6 hours prior to PF-06801591 dosing.
Titer of Treatment-Induced NAb Against PF-06801591
Time Frame: Cycle 1: at Day 1, Day 29, and Day 85; Cycle 2: at Day 29; at the EOT visit, and 2, 4 and 6 months after EOT. Samples collected on dosing days were obtained within 6 hours prior to PF-06801591 dosing.
Only those samples tested positive for ADA were to be further tested for Nab. Blood samples (approximately 5 mL) to provide at least 1 mL of serum for detection of NAb against PF-06801591 were collected from participants enrolled in Cohorts 6A to 9A and Cohorts 3B and 5B. Nab against PF-06801591 was not examined due to business reason.
Cycle 1: at Day 1, Day 29, and Day 85; Cycle 2: at Day 29; at the EOT visit, and 2, 4 and 6 months after EOT. Samples collected on dosing days were obtained within 6 hours prior to PF-06801591 dosing.
Objective Response Rate (ORR) by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST v1.1) in Cohort 7A and 3B Combined and All mCRPC Patients
Time Frame: Baseline up to 6 months after EOT (52 months in maximum)
ORR was defined as the percentage of participants with best overall response based assessment of confirmed complete response (CR) or confirmed partial response (PR) according to RECIST v1.1. Per RECIST v1.1: CR was defined as complete disappearance of all target lesions and non-target disease, with the exception of nodal disease. All nodes, both target and non-target, must decrease to normal (short axis <10 mm) and no new lesions. PR was defined as >=30% decrease under baseline of the sum of diameters of all target lesions. The short axis was used in the sum for target nodes, while the longest diameter was used in the sum for all other target lesions. No unequivocal progression of non-target disease and no new lesions.
Baseline up to 6 months after EOT (52 months in maximum)
Duration of Response (DOR) by RECIST v1.1 in Cohort 7A and 3B Combined and All mCRPC Patients
Time Frame: Baseline up to 6 months after EOT (52 months in maximum)
DOR was defined as the time from first documentation of confirmed CR or PR to date of first documentation of progressive disease (PD) or death due to any cause according to RECIST v1.1. Per RECIST v1.1: CR was defined as complete disappearance of all target lesions and non-target disease, with the exception of nodal disease. All nodes, both target and non-target, must decrease to normal (short axis <10 mm) and no new lesions. PR was defined as >=30% decrease under baseline of the sum of diameters of all measurable target lesions. The short axis was used in the sum for target nodes, while the longest diameter was used in the sum for all other target lesions. No unequivocal progression of non-target disease and no new lesions. PD was defined as >=20% increase in the sum of diameters of target measurable lesions above the smallest sum observed, with a minimum absolute increase of 5 mm. Unequivocal progression of pre existing lesions for non-target disease.
Baseline up to 6 months after EOT (52 months in maximum)
Immune-Related Confirmed ORR by Immune Related Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (irRECIST v1.1) in Cohort 7A and 3B Combined and All mCRPC Patients
Time Frame: Baseline up to 6 months after EOT (52 months in maximum)
Immune-related confirmed ORR was defined as the percentage of participants with objective response based assessment of confirmed immune related complete response (irCR) or confirmed immune related partial response (irPR) according to irRECIST v1.1. Per irRECIST v1.1: irCR was defined as complete disappearance of all lesions and no new lesions. All measurable lymph nodes also must have a reduction in short axis to <10 mm. irPR was defined as sum of the diameters (longest for non nodal lesions, shortest for nodal lesions) of target and new measurable lesions must decrease >=30%.
Baseline up to 6 months after EOT (52 months in maximum)
Immune-Related Confirmed DOR by irRECIST v1.1 in Cohort 7A and 3B Combined and All mCRPC Patients
Time Frame: Baseline up to 6 months after EOT (52 months in maximum)
Immune-related confirmed DOR was defined as the time from first documentation of confirmed irCR or confirmed irPR to date of first documentation of immune related progressive disease (irPD) or death due to any cause according to irRECIST. Per irRECIST v1.1: irCR was defined as complete disappearance of all lesions and no new lesions. All measurable lymph nodes also must have a reduction in short axis to <10 mm. irPR was defined as sum of the diameters (longest for non nodal lesions, shortest for nodal lesions) of target and new measurable lesions must decrease >=30%. irPD was defined as sum of the diameters of target and new measurable lesions must increase >=20%, confirmed by a repeat, consecutive observation at least 4 weeks from the date first documented.
Baseline up to 6 months after EOT (52 months in maximum)
Number of Patients With Bone Progression Per Prostrate Cancer Working Group 3 (PCWG3) Criteria in Cohort 7A and 3B Combined
Time Frame: Baseline up to 6 months after EOT (52 months in maximum)
Number of participants with bone progression per Prostate Cancer Clinical Trials Working Group 3 (PCWG3). Per PCWG3, progressing disease on bone scan was considered when at least two new lesions relative to the first post treatment scan was confirmed on a subsequent scan (6 or more weeks later).
Baseline up to 6 months after EOT (52 months in maximum)
Radiographic Progression Free Survival (rPFS) Per RECIST v1.1 in Cohort 7A and 3B Combined , All mCRPC Patients, Cohort 1B, and Cohort 5B
Time Frame: Baseline up to 6 months after EOT (52 months in maximum)
Radiographic Progression Free Survival (rPFS) per RECIST v1.1. rPFS was defined as the time from first dose of study treatment to date of first documentation of radiographic PD or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first. Per RECIST v1.1, PD was defined as >=20% increase in the sum of diameters of target measurable lesions above the smallest sum observed, with a minimum absolute increase of 5 mm. Unequivocal progression of pre existing lesions for non-target disease. The Kaplan Meier estimate of median rPFS was presented here.
Baseline up to 6 months after EOT (52 months in maximum)
Number of Participants Achieving Central PSA Response >= 50% Decline From Baseline (PSA-50) in Part B
Time Frame: At screening; Cycle 1 and 2: at Day 1, Day 29, Day 57, and Day 85; at the EOT visit, and 1, 2, 4 and 6 months after EOT.
PSA-50 response rate was defined as the proportion of patients whose on-study PSA declined from baseline by at least 50% at two consecutive measurements at least 3 weeks apart, prior to other systematic anti-cancer therapy.
At screening; Cycle 1 and 2: at Day 1, Day 29, Day 57, and Day 85; at the EOT visit, and 1, 2, 4 and 6 months after EOT.
Duration of PSA-50 Response in Part B
Time Frame: Days 1, 29, 57 of Cycle 1 and Cycle 2.
Duration of PSA-50 response was defined as the period from the first measurement when PSA-50 response was achieved to the measurement when PSA-50 response no longer held.
Days 1, 29, 57 of Cycle 1 and Cycle 2.
Baseline for PSA in Part B
Time Frame: At screening and Cycle 1 Day 1.
PSA Baseline is defined as the most recent non-missing value prior to dosing.
At screening and Cycle 1 Day 1.
Baseline for PSA Doubling Time (PSADT) in Part B
Time Frame: At screening and Cycle 1 Day 1.
PSADT was defined as the natural log of 2 divided by the slope of the linear regression line of the natural log of PSA against time in month. Baseline has been calculated from the PSA values at screening and C1D1.
At screening and Cycle 1 Day 1.
Baseline for PSA Slope in Part B
Time Frame: At screening and Cycle 1 Day 1.
PSA slope was defined as the slope of the linear regression line of natural log of PSA against time in month. Baseline has been calculated from the PSA values at screening and C1D1.
At screening and Cycle 1 Day 1.
Baseline for PSA Velocity in Part B
Time Frame: At screening and Cycle 1 Day 1.
PSA velocity was defined as the slope of the linear regression line of PSA against time in month. Baseline has been calculated from the PSA values at screening and C1D1.
At screening and Cycle 1 Day 1.
Change in PSADT at Post-Treatment Visit From Baseline in Part B
Time Frame: At screening; Cycle 1 and 2: at Day 1, Day 29, Day 57, and Day 85; at the EOT visit, and 1, 2, 4 and 6 months after EOT.
PSADT was defined as the natural log of 2 divided by the slope of the linear regression line of the natural log of PSA against time in month. PSADT at the post-treatment visit was calculated from C1D1 and all post-treatment PSA values.
At screening; Cycle 1 and 2: at Day 1, Day 29, Day 57, and Day 85; at the EOT visit, and 1, 2, 4 and 6 months after EOT.
Change in PSA Slope at Post-Treatment Visit From Baseline in Part B
Time Frame: At screening; Cycle 1 and 2: at Day 1, Day 29, Day 57, and Day 85; at the EOT visit, and 1, 2, 4 and 6 months after EOT.
PSA slope was defined as the slope of the linear regression line of natural log of PSA against time in month. PSA slope at the post-treatment visit was calculated from C1D1 and all post-treatment PSA values.
At screening; Cycle 1 and 2: at Day 1, Day 29, Day 57, and Day 85; at the EOT visit, and 1, 2, 4 and 6 months after EOT.
Change in PSA Velocity at Post-Treatment Visit From Baseline in Part B
Time Frame: At screening; Cycle 1 and 2: at Day 1, Day 29, Day 57, and Day 85; at the EOT visit, and 1, 2, 4 and 6 months after EOT.
PSA velocity was defined as the slope of the linear regression line of PSA against time in month. PSA velocity at the post-treatment visit was calculated from C1D1 and all post-treatment PSA values.
At screening; Cycle 1 and 2: at Day 1, Day 29, Day 57, and Day 85; at the EOT visit, and 1, 2, 4 and 6 months after EOT.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Study Director: Pfizer CT.gov Call Center, Pfizer

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 30, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 23, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

February 23, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 24, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 24, 2015

First Posted (Estimated)

November 26, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 2, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 18, 2023

Last Verified

January 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

Pfizer will provide access to individual de-identified participant data and related study documents (e.g. protocol, Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP), Clinical Study Report (CSR)) upon request from qualified researchers, and subject to certain criteria, conditions, and exceptions. Further details on Pfizer's data sharing criteria and process for requesting access can be found at: https://www.pfizer.com/science/clinical_trials/trial_data_and_results/data_requests.

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Prostatic Neoplasms

Clinical Trials on PF-06755992

3
Subscribe