Ketamine Infusion in Neurologic Deficit (KIND)

October 19, 2020 updated by: Dr. Andrew Baker

A Pilot Study of Sub-anesthetic Ketamine Infusion for Neuroprotection After Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: Effects on White Matter Integrity, Inflammatory Biomarkers and Neurocognitive Outcome

Subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) or bleeding in the brain as a result of ruptured aneurysm is a devastating type of stroke. Many patients who undergo emergent neurosurgery to repair the aneurysm and remove the bleeding suffer from complications in their subsequent hospital stay, the most frequent and morbid of which is delayed cerebral ischemia (DCI) or small strokes resulting from impaired blood flow to certain vital brain centers. This occurs because of changes to the brain's blood vessels that occur after the bleed. The arteries can become narrow (spasm) or small clots can form within the vasculature that disrupts normal blood flow. Patients are left with profound neurologic deficits from these secondary complications.

Anesthesiologists, neurosurgeons, and intensivists are in need of a way to protect the brain during this vulnerable period following aneurysm repair. One drug that may provide such protection is ketamine, a compound frequently used in operating rooms and intensive care units to provide anesthesia and analgesia. Ketamine works by blocking glutamate receptor ion channels that play a pivotal role in promoting brain cell death during strokes by flooding the brain with too much calcium and dangerous chemicals. This project is designed to test the efficacy of ketamine in protecting the brain following aneurysm repair by using a controlled infusion of the drug in the intensive care unit (ICU) when patients return from their operation.

Study Overview

Status

Unknown

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) is a devastating type of stroke, with significant long-term morbidity for patients who survive the initial bleed. The most frequent and morbid complication is delayed cerebral ischemia (DCI) resulting from angiographic vasospasm of the arteries of the circle of Willis. At present, there is no protective therapy aimed at neuronal preservation during this period of ischemia. The standard medical care is primarily to maintain intravascular volume status to improve cerebral perfusion during arterial narrowing, or calcium channel blockers for smooth muscle relaxation on the arterial wall. Experimental and clinical data suggest a primary mechanism of neuronal injury during ischemia is excitotoxicity, glutamate-induced cell death resulting from overstimulation of ionotropic N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptors and resultant excessive calcium influx. Ketamine is a dissociative anesthetic with a mechanism of action of non-competitive antagonism of the NMDA receptor, routinely used in operating rooms and intensive care units as an analgesic and anesthetic. In addition to its anesthetic properties, ketamine is also an anti-inflammatory agent and a sympathomimetic, maintaining sedation without the adverse effects of hemodynamic instability. Identification of a neuroprotective entity for DCI following SAH would vastly improve the quality of life and shorten hospital stay for patients with a ruptured intracerebral aneurysm. It is critical to identify such agents so that patients survive their injury, spend shorter time in the ICU, and can return to work and maintain relationships.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

50

Phase

  • Phase 2
  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Ontario
      • Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M5B 1W8
        • Recruiting
        • St Michael's Hospital
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Andrew Baker, MD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years to 78 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Male or female 18 to 80 years old.
  2. World Federation of Neurological Surgeons (WFNS) grade 2 to 4, obtained after resuscitation and prior to dosing.
  3. SAH on admission cranial computed tomography (CT) scan (diffuse clot present in both hemispheres, thin or thick [>4 mm], or local thick SAH (>4 mm).
  4. Ruptured saccular aneurysm, confirmed by catheter angiography (CA) or CT angiography (CTA) and treated by neurosurgical clipping or endovascular coiling.
  5. External ventricular drain placed as part of routine care.
  6. Able to be dosed within 4 hours of new neurologic deficit.
  7. Historical modified Rankin score of 0 or 1.
  8. Hemodynamically stable after resuscitation (systolic blood pressure > 100 mm Hg)
  9. Haemoglobin >85 g/L, platelets >125,000 cells/mm3
  10. Informed consent.
  11. New neurologic deficits that were not present previously, identified by 1) a decrease of 2 points on the modified Glasgow coma scale (mGCS) or 2) an increase in 2 points on the National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS). i.e., a CODE VASOSPASM initiated in the ICU.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Subarachnoid hemorrhage due to causes other than a saccular aneurysm (e.g., trauma or rupture of fusiform or infective aneurysm).
  2. WFNS Grade 1 or 5 assessed after the completion of aneurysm repair.
  3. Increased intracranial pressure (ICP) >30 mm Hg in sedated patients lasting >4 hours anytime since admission.
  4. Intraventricular or intracerebral hemorrhage in absence of SAH or with only local, thin SAH.
  5. Angiographic vasospasm prior to aneurysm repair procedure, as documented by catheter angiogram or CT angiogram.
  6. Major complication during aneurysm repair such as, but not limited to, massive intraoperative hemorrhage, brain swelling, arterial occlusion, or inability to secure the ruptured aneurysm.
  7. Aneurysm repair requiring flow diverting stent or stent-assisted coiling and dual antiplatelet therapy.
  8. Hemodynamically unstable prior to administration of study drug (i.e., SBP <90 mm Hg, requiring >6 L colloid or crystalloid fluid resuscitation).
  9. Cardiopulmonary resuscitation was required following SAH.
  10. Female patients with positive pregnancy test (blood or urine) at screening.
  11. History within the past 6 months and/or physical finding on admission of decompensated heart failure (New York Heart Association [NYHA] Class III and IV or heart failure requiring hospitalization).
  12. Acute myocardial infarction within 3 months prior to the administration of the study drug.
  13. Symptoms or electrocardiogram (ECG)-based signs of acute myocardial infarction or unstable angina pectoris on admission.
  14. Electrocardiogram evidence and/or physical findings compatible with second or third degree heart block or of cardiac arrhythmia associated with hemodynamic instability.
  15. Echocardiogram, if performed as part of standard-of-care before treatment, revealing a left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) <40%.
  16. Severe or unstable concomitant condition or disease (e.g., known significant neurologic deficit, cancer, hematologic, or coronary disease), or chronic condition (e.g., psychiatric disorder) that, in the opinion of the Investigator, may increase the risk associated with study participation or study drug administration, or may interfere with the interpretation of study results.
  17. Patients who have received an investigational product or participated in another interventional clinical study within 30 days prior to randomization.
  18. Kidney disease as defined by plasma creatinine ≥2.5 mg/dl (221 umol/l); liver disease as defined by total bilirubin >3 mg/dl (51.3 mmol/l); and/or known diagnosis or clinical suspicion of liver cirrhosis.
  19. Known hypersensitivity or contraindication to ketamine per product monograph.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: 0.9% NaCl control
Normal saline
500 ml of 0.9% NaCl infused at 5 ug/kg/min for 4 hours.
Other Names:
  • NS
Experimental: Ketamine
Anesthetic
500 ml of ketamine (0.2 mg/ml) infused at 5 ug/kg/min for 4 hours.
Other Names:
  • Ketamine HCl

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Changes in physiologic parameters as specified below
Time Frame: During infusion and 1 hour post-infusion
Temperature, heart rate (HR), mean arterial pressure (MAP), intracranial pressure (ICP), central venous pressure (CVP) if available, peak airway pressure (PAP) if available, end-tidal carbon dioxide (ETCO2) will be evaluated during infusion. Collected measurement data will be analyzed based on the occurrence of adverse events such as increase in ICP by more than 3 mmHg, increase in HR by more than 30 bpm, increase in partial pressure of CO2 (pCO2) by more than 20 mmHg, increase in lactate by more than 0.5, drop in pH by more than 0.2, increase in systolic blood pressure (SBP0 to over 200 mmHg, or any other unforeseen event that is deemed to be related to the drug treatment with adverse effects on the patient.
During infusion and 1 hour post-infusion

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Biologic samples
Time Frame: Day 1-2 post-infusion
Blood and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) samples will be collected and analyzed for biomarker levels which would indicate extent of neuronal injury.
Day 1-2 post-infusion
Neurocognitive test Montreal Cognitive Assessment Scale (MoCA)
Time Frame: Day 30 or Day 60 post-DCI
Neurocognitive function will be assessed using the MoCA to determine preliminary effects of ketamine on neurocognitive outcome.
Day 30 or Day 60 post-DCI
Neurocognitive test modified Rankin Scale (mRS)
Time Frame: Day 30 or Day 60 post-DCI
Neurocognitive function will be assessed using the mRS determine preliminary effects of ketamine on neurocognitive outcome.
Day 30 or Day 60 post-DCI
Brain imaging using Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)
Time Frame: Day 30 or Day 60 post-DCI
Structural and functional brain imaging will be conducted using Tesla MRI system to assess white matter integrity.
Day 30 or Day 60 post-DCI
Hospital anxiety and depression score
Time Frame: Day 30 or Day 60 post-DCI
Assessments for neuro-cognitive outcomes and correlation with MRI findings
Day 30 or Day 60 post-DCI
EQ-5D-5L
Time Frame: Day 30 or Day 60 post-DCI
Neurocognitive outcome assessment and correlation with MRI results
Day 30 or Day 60 post-DCI
Trail making test
Time Frame: Day 30 or Day 60 post-DCI
Neurocognitive outcome assessment and correlation with MRI results
Day 30 or Day 60 post-DCI
Verbal fluency tests
Time Frame: Day 30 or Day 60 post-DCI
Neurocognitive outcome assessment and correlation with MRI results
Day 30 or Day 60 post-DCI

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Andrew Baker, MD, FRCPC, Unity Health Toronto

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

January 1, 2016

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

March 1, 2021

Study Completion (Anticipated)

March 1, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 8, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 16, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

December 21, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 22, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 19, 2020

Last Verified

October 1, 2020

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Subarachnoid Hemorrhage

Clinical Trials on 0.9% NaCl

3
Subscribe