Tenotomy or Tenodesis of Long Head Biceps in Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair (BITE)

September 27, 2019 updated by: DFP van Deurzen, Onze Lieve Vrouwe Gasthuis

Long Head Biceps Tenodesis or Tenotomy in Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair: An International Multicenter Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial

During arthroscopic rotator cuff (infraspinatus/supraspinatus) repair, biceps tendon lesions are frequently encountered. However, the most optimal treatment of the diseased long head of the biceps (LHB) tendon during rotator cuff repair remains a topic of debate: tenotomy or tenodesis. The hypothesis is that there is no difference in functional outcome between LHB tenotomy and LHB tenodesis when performed in adjunct to arthroscopic rotator cuff repair.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Patients older than 50 years with a supraspinatus and/or infraspinatus tendon rupture sized smaller than 3cm, who are encountered with LHB pathology, will be randomized to either LHB tenotomy or LHB tenodesis. Clinical and self-reported data will be collected pre-operatively, and 6 weeks, 3 months, and 1 year after surgery.

Primary outcome is overall shoulder function evaluated with the Constant score. As additional measures of shoulder function, the Dutch Oxford Shoulder Test and the Disabilities of the Arm Shoulder and Hand questionnaire will be assessed. Other evaluations include cosmetic appearance evaluated by the ''Popeye'' deformity, arm cramping pain, elbow flexion strength, MRI evaluation, quality of life, and cost of surgery. To detect non-inferiority with a one-sided, two-sample t-test with a 80% power and a significance level (alpha) of 0.025, the required sample size is 98 patients.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

98

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Amsterdam, Netherlands, 1066EC
        • Slootervaart ziekenhuis
      • Amsterdam, Netherlands, 1075BG
        • Kliniek De Lairesse
      • Amsterdam, Netherlands, 1090HM
        • OLVG
      • Apeldoorn, Netherlands, 7334DZ
        • Gelre Ziekenhuis
      • Breda, Netherlands, 4819JV
        • Amphia Ziekenhuis
      • Gouda, Netherlands, 2803HH
        • Groene Hart Ziekenhuis
      • Hilversum, Netherlands
        • Tergooi ziekenhuizen
      • Hoofddorp, Netherlands
        • Spaarne Ziekenhuis
      • Nieuwegein, Netherlands, 3430EM
        • St Antonius
      • Nijmegen, Netherlands
        • Canisius Wilehelmina Zkh

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

50 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients older than 50 years
  • Degenerative rotator cuff lesion of supraspinatus/infraspinatus tendon, smaller than three centimeter.
  • Patients need to be able to read and write in Dutch or English language in order to complete the questionnaires, and sign informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Acute, traumatic or partial thickness rotator cuff rupture, or in case a full thickness tear is larger than 3 cm measured using an arthroscopic ruler.
  • Accompanying subscapularis tendon lesion
  • Hour-glass deformation bicepstendon origin or in case of accompanying subscapularis tendon rupture.
  • Osteoarthritis of the glenohumeral joint
  • Acromion to humeral head distance measuring 6mm or smaller.
  • Prior surgery to the involved shoulder
  • Dementia or inability to complete questionnaires and assessments

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: @ Cuff repair with LHB tenodesis
In case of pathologic changes of the long Head Biceps tendon, a tenodesis is performed in adjunct to performing an arthroscopic rotator cuff repair.
Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair using suture anchors
Arthroscopic tenotomy and subsequent fixation of long head biceps proximal in the biceps groove
Active Comparator: @ cuff repair with LHB tenotomy
In case of pathologic changes of the long Head Biceps tendon, a tenotomy is performed in adjunct to performing an arthroscopic rotator cuff repair.
Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair using suture anchors
Arthroscopic tenotomy of long head biceps

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Shoulder function quantified with the Constant score (0-100)
Time Frame: 1 year

Sum of the items below:

ADL: Patient reported shoulder function during work (0-4), recreation/sports (0-4), and sleep (0-2).

Pain: Patient reported pain in the shoulder (severe=0,moderate=5,mild=10,no pain=15).

ROM: Anteflexion up to waist(2)/xiphoid process(4)/neck(6)/head(8)/above head(10) Elevation in degrees: 0-30(0)/31-60(2)/61-90(4)/91-120(6)/121-150(8)/151-180(10) Abduction in degrees: 0-30(0)/31-60(2)/61-90(4)/91-120(6)/121-150(8)/151-180(10) External rotation: impossible to reach head with hand(0)/hand behind head-elbow forward(2)/hand behind head-elbow backward(4)/hand on head-elbow forward(6)/hand on head-elbow backward(8)/full elevation hand from head(10) Internal rotation: dorsal part of the hand reaching lateral thigh(0)/buttock(2)/lumbo-sacral junction(4)/L3(6)/Th12(8)/between scapulae(10).

Abduction force at 90 degrees in pounds (max. 25)

1 year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Popeye phenomenon
Time Frame: 1 year
Presence of a Popeye deformity in the upper arm (yes/no), as reported by the patient, the treating surgeon, and a blinded assessor.
1 year
Cosmetic appearance
Time Frame: 1 year
Patients will assess cosmetic appearance on a VAS scale.
1 year
MRI-based location of the biceps tendon
Time Frame: 1 year
MRI imaging at 1 year after surgery will be used to assess the location of the proximal biceps tendon. Absence of the biceps tendon in the bicipital groove confirms a successfully performed LHB tenotomy. Absence of the biceps tendon in the bicipital groove confirms failed LHB tendodesis. In addition, the rotator cuff is classified as fully healed, partially healed or recurrent rupture.
1 year
Self-reported shoulder function
Time Frame: 1 year
Patients will complete two validated questionnaires: the Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder and Hand Questionnaire (DASH) and the Dutch Oxford Shoulder Test (DOST)
1 year
Pain
Time Frame: 1 year
Patients will be asked to report if they have pain (yes/no), and to indicate the level of pain on a VAS scale. The VAS scores will be recorded separately for general pain and for pain in the bicipital groove.
1 year
Elbow flexion strength
Time Frame: 1 year
A dynamometer will be used to assess elbow flexion strength with the lower arm in full supination. The Elbow Strength Index is calculated by dividing the strength in the affected side by the strength in the contralateral side.
1 year
Quality of life
Time Frame: 1 year
Patients will complete the validated questionnaire 'EQ-5D', which covers 5 domains (mobility, personal care, daily activities, pain and mood), as well as a 100 point thermometer on general health.
1 year
Post-operative status of rotator cuff
Time Frame: 1 year
Based on MRI imaging at 1 year after surgery, the rotator cuff is classified as fully healed, partially healed or recurrent rupture.
1 year
Duration of surgery
Time Frame: 1 year
The duration of surgery will be calculated based on the start and end times of each surgery.
1 year
Complications
Time Frame: 1 year
All complications and serious adverse events in the study population are recorded.
1 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Derek van Deurzen, MD, OLVG

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

July 1, 2012

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 1, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

September 1, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 29, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 12, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

January 14, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 1, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 27, 2019

Last Verified

September 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • WO 10.087

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Rotator Cuff Syndrome

Clinical Trials on Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair

3
Subscribe