Intra-corporeal vs Extra-corporeal Anastomosis in Laparoscopically Assisted Right Hemicolectomy

The creation of an intracorporeal anastomosis during right hemicolectomy is regarded as superior than the extracorporeal anastomosis in terms of recovery of peristalsis, aesthetic results, analgesia requirements and length of hospital stay. The objective of this study is to compare the postoperative results of intracorporeal versus extracorporeal anastomosis in patients undergoing laparoscopic right hemicolectomy.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Laparoscopic surgery has entailed a great technical revolution in colorectal surgery, providing a better and quicker return to normal functions of the patients, associating a lower morbidity and better aesthetic results compared with traditional open surgery. This study wants to find the difference between intracorporeal and extracorporeal anastomosis.

The creation of an intracorporeal anastomosis in right hemicolectomy seems superior to extracorporeal anastomosis in terms of recovery of the normal bowel function, wound size, aesthetic results and analgesia requirements. This will entail a shorter hospital stay. Several studies have demonstrated this but all of them are retrospective non randomised.

In terms of postoperative pain, the most accepted theory is that it depends on the traction of the porto-mesenteric axis. When the intracorporeal anastomosis is performed there is no traction of this mesenteric axis while in the extracorporeal anastomosis this traction is more important in obese patients.

This traction of the mesentery, as well as being one of the main factors related with postoperative pain, is responsible of the postoperative adynamic ileus, that should have a higher incidence when the manipulation is higher.

In the patients undergoing an intracorporeal anastomosis, the assistance incision will be a suprapubic Pfannenstiel. In the patients undergoing an extracorporeal anastomosis the assistance incision will be a transverse in the right upper quadrant. It is well known that the Pfannenstiel incision has a lower incidence of superficial surgical wound infection, a lower rate of incisional hernia, a lower need of analgesics, and better aesthetic results, when compared with the incision in the right upper quadrant.

All this factors should entail a lower hospital stay in patients undergoing an intracorporeal anastomosis.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

140

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Barcelona, Spain, 08025
        • Hospital de La Santa Creu I Sant Pau

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years to 97 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Surgical procedure with curative purpose.
  • American Society of Anaesthesiologists Physical Status (ASA) I, II and III.
  • Elective surgery.
  • Informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Denial of informed consent.
  • Advanced neoplasia.
  • Urgent surgery.
  • ASA IV.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Intracorporeal anastomosis
Iso or anti-peristaltic side-to-side ileo-colonic anastomosis with Echelon Endopatch and closure of the defect with running suture or another firing of Echelon Endopatch. The surgical specimen will be retrieved through a Pfannenstiel incision.
Iso or anti-peristaltic side-to-side ileo-colonic anastomosis with Echelon Endopatch and closure of the defect with running suture or another firing of Echelon Endopatch. The surgical specimen will be retrieved through a Pfannenstiel incision.
Use of an Echelon Endopatch Powered Device to perform an ileocolonic side-to-side anastomosis.
Active Comparator: Extracorporeal anastomosis
A transverse incision in the right upper quadrant will be performed. An iso or anti-peristaltic side-to-side ileo-colonic anastomosis with Proximate Linear Cutter device and Proximate Rel Stapler
A transverse incision in the right upper quadrant will be performed. An iso or anti-peristaltic side-to-side ileo-colonic anastomosis with Proximate Linear Cutter device and Proximate Stapler.
Use of a Proximate Linear Cutter device to perform a side-to-side ileo-colonic anastomosis.Use of a Proximate stapler to the closure of the defect associated with the creation of the side-to-side ileo-colonic anastomosis.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Length of stay
Time Frame: 1 month
is identified when the patient has tolerated diet and has had bowel movements and is discharged from the hospital
1 month

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Return to normal peristalsis
Time Frame: 1 week
Physiological parameter
1 week
Size of the surgical wound
Time Frame: 1 month
we measure the wound in cm
1 month
Rate of Surgical Site Infection
Time Frame: 1 month
clinical wound infection or positive culture
1 month
Rate of Incisional Hernia
Time Frame: 1 year after discharge
Physical exploration and CT scan (performed during the follow up)
1 year after discharge
Aesthetic result
Time Frame: 1 month after discharge
Questionnaire
1 month after discharge
Postoperative pain
Time Frame: 1 month after discharge
Questionnaire
1 month after discharge

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Jesus Bollo, Fundació Institut de Recerca de l'Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 20, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 21, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

July 21, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 13, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 26, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

January 29, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 14, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 11, 2019

Last Verified

January 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Yes

IPD Plan Description

Raw data will be available upon request to the main researcher.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

All the time

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

without

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • Study Protocol
  • Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP)
  • Informed Consent Form (ICF)
  • Clinical Study Report (CSR)
  • Analytic Code

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pain

Clinical Trials on Intracorporeal anastomosis.

3
Subscribe