CO2-Laser Treatment in Patients With Diabetic Infected Foot Ulcers (DULCIS)

October 13, 2016 updated by: Edoardo Mannucci, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi

A Randomised, Open Label, Controlled Clinical Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of CO2-Laser Treatment in Patients With Diabetic Infected Foot Ulcers

The study is aimed at comparing debridement either with CO2 laser or traditional surgery in patients with infected diabetic foot ulcers. The principal endpoint is bacterial load immediately after treatment.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

The present study is designed to assess the antimicrobial effect of a single CO2 laser beam (DEKA SmartXide2 c80-El.En, Florence Italy) in the treatment of diabetic infected foot ulcers. CO2 laser debridement will be compared with standard surgical care. The primary efficacy endpoint will be the reduction of bacterial load between pre- and immediately after debridement. Secondary endpoints will be adverse events and pain during treatment. Two bacterial sample with a flocked nylon swab will be collected before and after debridement.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

20

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Diabetes
  • Infected foot ulcer (with clinical signs of infection)
  • Ulcer area between 0.5 and 150 cm2
  • More than 50% of ulcer area covered by fibrin and/or necrosis
  • Texas score <3

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Need for revascularization
  • Pregnancy or lactation

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: CO2 laser
Ulcer debridement with laser-CO2 (DEKA SmartXide2 c80-El.En, Florence Italy)
Single session of CO2 laser debridement
Active Comparator: Traditional surgery
Ulcer debridement with traditional surgery
Single session of traditional debridement

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Bacterial Load
Time Frame: Percent change in bacterial colonies from baseline. Variation from baseline and immediately after the end of procedure.
Percent change in bacterial colonies from baseline.
Percent change in bacterial colonies from baseline. Variation from baseline and immediately after the end of procedure.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pain: Scores of Brief Pain Inventory
Time Frame: During procedure.
Scores of Brief Pain Inventory. Scale ranges: from 0 to 10. 0 = No pain; 10= Pain as bad as you can imagine.
During procedure.
Fibrin: Percent of Ulcer Area Covered by Fibrin
Time Frame: Baseline and immediately after the end of procedure
Percent change of ulcer area covered by fibrin from baseline to immediately after the end of procedure
Baseline and immediately after the end of procedure
Granulation: Percent of Ulcer Area Covered by Granulation.
Time Frame: Baseline and immediately after procedure
Percent change of ulcer area covered by granulation from baseline to immediately after the end of procedure.
Baseline and immediately after procedure
Bleeding: Proportion of Patients With Bleeding Necessitating Haemostasis
Time Frame: during procedure
proportion of patients with bleeding necessitating haemostasis
during procedure

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Edoardo Mannucci, MD, University of Florence

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

January 1, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 3, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 5, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

February 9, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

December 6, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 13, 2016

Last Verified

October 1, 2016

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Diabetic Foot Ulcer

Clinical Trials on CO2 laser

3
Subscribe