Predicting, Understanding and Speeding Recovery After TKA

October 3, 2023 updated by: Wake Forest University Health Sciences

Predicting, Understanding, and Speeding Recovery After Total Knee Arthroplasty

The objective of this research study is to better understand patterns of recovery after Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA) amd Total Hip Replacement (THA). The study will evaluate how pain, activity and cognitive (i.e., thinking style) responses determine patterns of recovery, and the study will evaluate the efficacy of gabapentin versus placebo for improving recovery after surgery.

Study Overview

Status

Terminated

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

The investigators propose a two-site, longitudinal, double-blind, randomized clinical intervention study to examine three specific aims:

Aim 1: Characterize the dynamic pain experience, activity, and cognitive response after TKA and determine patterns of recovery in these domains

Aim 2: Test whether gabapentin alters time course of recovery after TKA or THA in a manner dependent on its interaction with pre-drug pupil diameter and preferred style in the catastrophizing-optimism dimension

Aim 3: Test whether gabapentin increases pupil diameter in patients undergoing TKA or THA who are on high dose opioids preoperatively and to examine whether opioid use moderates the associations in Aim 1

Primary Hypothesis: Novel variance beyond established associations in recovery from pain following TKA or THA surgery is accounted for by the interaction between pupil diameter and Cognitive-Affective (C-A) state, and this interaction predicts efficacy of gabapentin to speed recovery.

Key secondary hypotheses: Disability, impulsivity, and attentional deficits recover after TKA or THA surgery follow a log of time pattern, and are predicted by C-A state and its interaction with pupil diameter. Gabapentin increases resting pupil diameter in patients scheduled for TKA who are receiving high doses of opioids.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

350

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • North Carolina
      • Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States, 27157
        • Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 70 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adults scheduled for elective total knee or hip replacement
  • American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status 1-3
  • Participants must be able to read and write English

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Inability to complete questionnaires
  • Pregnancy
  • Litigation or workers compensation related to joint surgery
  • For 250 subjects in primary analysis - taking < 100 mg morphine equivalents/day. For 50 subjects to test gabapentin's effect on pupil diameter - taking >100 mg morphine equivalents/day
  • history of Raynaud's disease of the feet
  • suffering from a psychotic disorder or a recent psychiatric hospitalization
  • history of eye surgery or topical eye medications that would render pupillometry unreliable or would directly affect pupil diameter.
  • any disorder that would affect pupil responsivity or prevent accuracy of pupillometry such as movement disorders

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Gabapentin
Subjects will be randomized, stratifying for norepinephrine serotonin reuptake inhibitor (NSRI) use, to equal number to receive gabapentin or placebo pills. Drug treatment will begin 2 weeks prior to surgery and continue 3 weeks afterwards. Subjects randomized to gabapentin will receive 900 mg/day for the first week, 1800 mg/day for the next 3 weeks, and 900 mg/day for the last week.
Drug treatment will begin 2 weeks prior to surgery and continue 3 weeks afterwards. Subjects randomized to gabapentin will receive 900 mg/day for the first week, 1800 mg/day for the next 3 weeks, and 900 mg/day for the last week.
Other Names:
  • neurontin
Placebo Comparator: Placebo
Subjects will be randomized, stratifying for norepinephrine serotonin reuptake inhibitor (NSRI) use, to equal number to receive gabapentin or placebo pills. Drug treatment will begin 2 weeks prior to surgery and continue 3 weeks afterwards.
Drug treatment will begin 2 weeks prior to surgery and continue 3 weeks afterwards. Subjects randomized to gabapentin will receive 900 mg/day for the first week, 1800 mg/day for the next 3 weeks, and 900 mg/day for the last week.
Other Names:
  • Inert ingredient

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Comparison of Adjusted Trajectory Model for Pain Between Gabapentin and Placebo--Intercept
Time Frame: The first day after hospital discharge up to 5 days post surgery

Daily pain intensity report for each subject was fitted using growth curve model with parameters of intercept (modeled initial pain) and slope of change in natural log of time, adjusted for prognostic predictors for gabapentin and placebo group separately. The daily pain intensity was the WORST pain (not the average pain) in the past 24 hr on a scale where 0 is no pain and 10 is worst imaginable pain.

Values represent an intercept of modeled worst daily pain on the first day after hospital discharge across all participants, extracted from the mixed effect model. The intercept is a number representative of all participants in the Arm and is an estimate with confidence limits based on the model.

The first day after hospital discharge up to 5 days post surgery
Comparison of Adjusted Trajectory Model for Pain Between Gabapentin and Placebo-- Slope
Time Frame: Postoperative Day 1 through Postoperative Day 60

Daily pain intensity report for each subject was fitted using growth curve model with parameters of intercept (modeled initial pain) and slope of change in natural log of time, adjusted for prognostic predictors for gabapentin and placebo group separately. The daily pain intensity was the WORST pain (not the average pain) in the past 24 hr on a scale where 0 is no pain and 10 is worst imaginable pain.

Slope is defined as change in pain . Values represent the slope of modeled worst daily pain (0-10 scale as described above) divided by the natural log of time (days) across all participants, extracted from the mixed effect model. The slope is a number representative of all participants in the Arm and is an estimate with confidence limits based on the model.

Postoperative Day 1 through Postoperative Day 60
Effect Pupil Diameter, Catastrophizing-optimism Construct, and Gabapentin on Model Fit of the Trajectory of Change in Worst Daily Pain After Surgery
Time Frame: Postoperative Day 1 through Postoperative Day 60

Daily pain intensity report for each subject was fitted using growth curve model, adjusted for pre-specified prognostic predictors . The daily pain intensity was the WORST pain (not the average pain) in the past 24 hr on a scale where 0 is no pain and 10 is worst imaginable pain.

Deviance values were calculated from the model fit with just pre-specified prognostic predictors (Model 1) and the model fit with these predictors plus pupil diameter, catastrophizing-optimism construct, gabapentin treatment and their interaction. Deviance is a goodness-of-fit statistic for a statistical model; it is often used for statistical hypothesis testing. It is a generalization of the idea of using the sum of squares of residuals (SSR) in ordinary least squares to cases where model-fitting is achieved by maximum likelihood. Deviance ranges from 0 to infinity. The smaller the number the better the model fits the sample data.

Model fits were compared using Chi-squared test.

Postoperative Day 1 through Postoperative Day 60

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Wisconsin Card Sort Task
Time Frame: Preoperative, 2 months after surgery, 6 months after surgery
This is a physical card sorting game which measures attention to shifts in implicit rules as the game progresses. Perseverative errors are the number of sequential errors when rules of the game shift and reflect dysfunction of attention. This score ranges from 0 to 64 with larger numbers reflecting more dysfunction of attention.
Preoperative, 2 months after surgery, 6 months after surgery
Iowa Gambling Task
Time Frame: Preoperative, 2 months after surgery, 6 months after surgery
This is a computer based card game which assesses risk taking and impulsivity in which a score of -100 to 100 is calculated. Lower numbers indicate greater impulsiivity
Preoperative, 2 months after surgery, 6 months after surgery
Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia
Time Frame: Preoperative, 2 months after surgery, 6 months after surgery
This 17-question scale assesses the degree of fear of pain from joint movement and is commonly used in orthopedic injury or surgery studies. The scale ranges from 17 to 68 with 17 indicating no fear of movement and 68 indicating severe fear.
Preoperative, 2 months after surgery, 6 months after surgery

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Biomarkers of Stress
Time Frame: Preoperative
Blood and cerebrospinal fluid will be obtained and frozen for subsequent assessment of hormones, neurochemicals, and other secreted compounds indicative of stress. Analysis will be in the future and dependent upon new literature for ideal biomarkers.
Preoperative
Biomarkers of Noradrenergic Functioning
Time Frame: Preoperative
Blood and cerebrospinal fluid will be obtained and frozen for subsequent assessment of compounds reflecting noradrenergic functioning. Analysis will be in the future and dependent upon new literature for ideal biomarkers.
Preoperative

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: James C Eisenach, MD, Wake Forest University Health Sciences

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 2, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 9, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

February 9, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 1, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 15, 2016

First Posted (Estimated)

February 19, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 4, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 3, 2023

Last Verified

May 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pain

Clinical Trials on Gabapentin

3
Subscribe