Assessment of Physical Functioning and Handling of Spiolto Respimat in Patients With COPD (OTIVACTO)

April 15, 2019 updated by: Boehringer Ingelheim

Assessment of Physical Functioning and Handling of Spiolto® Respimat® in Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Requiring Long-acting Dual Bronchodilation in Routine Clinical Practice

The primary objective of this Non Interventional Study is to measure changes in physical functioning, a surrogate for physical activity and exercise capacity, in COPD patients on treatment with Spiolto® Respimat® in routine daily treatment after approximately 6 weeks.

A secondary objective is to evaluate the patient's general condition (physician's evaluation) from Visit 1 (baseline visit at the start of the study) to Visit 2 (final visit at the end of the study, approx. 6 weeks after Visit 1), as well as patient satisfaction with Spiolto® Respimat® at Visit 2.

Study Overview

Status

Terminated

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

132

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Multiple Locations, Belgium
      • Multiple Locations, Denmark
      • Multiple Locations, Luxembourg
      • Multiple Locations, Netherlands
      • One Or Multiple Investigational Sites, Portugal
      • One Or Multiple Investigational Site, Sweden

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

40 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) patients

Description

Inclusion criteria:

  1. Written informed consent prior to participation
  2. Female and male patients = 40 years of age
  3. Patients diagnosed with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) and requiring long-acting dual bronchodilation (LAMA + LABA) treatment according to approved Spiolto® Respimat® SmPC and COPD GOLD guideline recommendation

Exclusion criteria:

  1. Patients with contraindications according to Spiolto® Respimat® SmPC
  2. Patients who have been treated with a Long-acting beta2 adrenoceptor agonist\Long-acting muscarinic antagonist (LABA/LAMA) combination (free and fixed dose) in the previous 6 weeks.
  3. Patients continuing Long-acting beta2 adrenoceptor agonist Inhalative Corticosteroids (LABA-iCS) treatment should not be additionally treated with Spiolto® Respimat® in order to avoid a double dosing of long-acting beta-agonists
  4. Patients for whom further follow-up is not possible at the enrolling site during the planned study period of approx. 6 weeks
  5. Pregnancy and lactation
  6. Patients currently listed for lung transplantation
  7. Current participation in any clinical trial or any other non-interventional study of a drug or device Further exclusion criteria apply

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Spiolto Respimat
COPD patients requiring a fixed combination therapy of two long-acting bronchodilators (LAMA + LABA) according to approved Summary of Product Characteristics (SmPC) and Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) guidelines
Tiotropium bromide + Olodaterol

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of Patients With Therapeutic Success After Approximately (Approx.) 6 Weeks After Baseline
Time Frame: Visit 1 (baseline) and at Visit 2 (approx. 6 weeks later)

"Therapeutic success" is defined as a 10-point increase of physical functioning (PF)-10 between Visit 1 (baseline) and Visit 2 (approx. 6 weeks later) using a PF questionnaire, which is a subdomain of the Short form (SF)-36 patient questionnaire. The PF-10 sub-domain consists of 10 questions evaluating the extent of experienced restrictions while conducting usual activities. Each question of the PF-10 can be answered with "yes, limited a lot", "yes, limited a little", or "No, not limited at all", with a score of 1, 2, or 3. The scores over the 10 questions will be summed, resulting in a value between 10 (a patient answering all questions with "yes, limited a lot") and 30 (a patient answering all questions with "No, not limited at all"). The final sum of the individual scores will be standardized to a range of 0 to 100 using the following formula: 100*(sum-10)/20.

Percentage of patients with therapeutic success after approximately 6 weeks after baseline are presented

Visit 1 (baseline) and at Visit 2 (approx. 6 weeks later)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in the PF-10 Score From Visit 1 (Baseline) to Visit 2 (Approx. 6 Weeks Later)
Time Frame: Visit 1 (baseline) and at Visit 2 (approx. 6 weeks later)

Change in PF-10 score was determined by taking into account the individual change of each patient between Visit 1 and Visit 2.

PF questionnaire, is a sub-domain of the Short form (SF)-36 patient questionnaire. The PF-10 sub-domain consists of 10 questions evaluating the extent of experienced restrictions while conducting usual activities. Each question of the PF-10 can be answered with "yes, limited a lot", "yes, limited a little", or "No, not limited at all", with a score of 1, 2, or 3. The scores over the 10 questions will be summed, resulting in a value between 10 (a patient answering all questions with "yes, limited a lot") and 30 (a patient answering all questions with "No, not limited at all"). The final sum of the individual scores will be standardized to a range of 0 to 100 using the following formula: 100*(sum-10)/20.

Visit 1 (baseline) and at Visit 2 (approx. 6 weeks later)
General Condition of the Patient Evaluated by the Physician: Physicians' Global Evaluation (PGE)-Score at Visit 1 (Baseline) and at Visit 2 (Approx. 6 Weeks Later)
Time Frame: Visit 1 (baseline) and at Visit 2 (approx. 6 weeks later)

The treating physician used the Physician's Global Evaluation (PGE) to evaluate the general condition of the patient on an 8-point ordinal scale from 1 (very poor) to 8(excellent). PGE will be completed before and approx. 6 weeks after treatment initiation.

Count of patients with PGE score 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 are presented for Visit 1 and Visit 2.

Visit 1 (baseline) and at Visit 2 (approx. 6 weeks later)
Patient Satisfaction With Spiolto® Respimat® - Overall Satisfaction
Time Frame: Visit 2 (approx. 6 weeks post baseline)

A patient satisfaction survey is completed at Visit 2, using a 7-point ordinal scale with divisions from very dissatisfied to very satisfied.

Count of patients with divisions from very dissatisfied to very satisfied are presented.

Visit 2 (approx. 6 weeks post baseline)
Patient Satisfaction With Spiolto® Respimat® - Satisfaction With Inhaling From the Respimat® Device
Time Frame: Visit 2 (approx. 6 weeks post baseline)

A patient satisfaction survey is completed at Visit 2, using a 7-point ordinal scale with divisions from very dissatisfied to very satisfied.

Count of patients with divisions from very dissatisfied to very satisfied are presented.

Visit 2 (approx. 6 weeks post baseline)
Patient Satisfaction With Spiolto® Respimat® - Satisfaction With Handling of the Respimat® Inhalation Device
Time Frame: Visit 2 (approx. 6 weeks post baseline)

A patient satisfaction survey is completed at Visit 2, using a 7-point ordinal scale with divisions from very dissatisfied to very satisfied.

Count of patients with divisions from very dissatisfied to very satisfied are presented.

Visit 2 (approx. 6 weeks post baseline)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

August 26, 2016

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

December 14, 2017

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

December 14, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 3, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 22, 2016

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

March 28, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

April 16, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 15, 2019

Last Verified

April 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive

Clinical Trials on Spiolto Respimat

3
Subscribe