Clinical Trial to Evaluate Efficacy and Safety of Acellbia® (JSC "BIOCAD") With Methotrexate in First Line Biological Therapy of Patients With Active Rheumatoid Arthritis (ALTERRA)

January 24, 2018 updated by: Biocad

Multicenter Comparative Randomised Double-blind Placebo-controlled Clinical Trial to Evaluate Efficacy and Safety of Acellbia® (JSC "BIOCAD") With Methotrexate in First Line of Biological Therapy of Patients With Active Rheumatoid Arthritis

The mail goal of this study is to establish superiority in efficacy of Acellbia® applied in a dose of 600 mg (Day 1 and Day 15) in combination with methotrexate in patients with active RA seropositive previously untreated with biological therapy, compared to standard therapy with methotrexate.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

159

Phase

  • Phase 3

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

Written informed consent. Age from 18 to 80 years. Rheumatoid arthritis diagnosed at least 6 months before informed consent signing Presence of more than 8 swollen and more than 8 painful joints at screening. C-reactive protein 7 mg/l or more AND/OR erythrocyte sedimentation rate 28 mm/hour or more.

Antibodies to citrullinated cyclic peptide 20 U/ml or more AND/OR rheumatoid factor-IgM higher than upper normal limit.

Documented regular methotrexate intake for 12 weeks, stable dose from 10 to 25 mg/week during last 4 weeks before signing informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

Methotrexate intolerance. Felty's syndrome. Patient functional status - IV class according to ACR. Previous use of biologic drugs to treat rheumatoid arthritis, biologic drugs that deplete CD20-lymphocytes, azathioprine use in the last 28 days prior to informed consent signing, leflunomide use in the last 8 weeks prior to informed consent signing, sulphasalazine/hydroxyquinoline use in the last 28 days prior to informed consent signing, intraarticular use of corticosteroids in the last 4 weeks prior to informed consent signing, patient requires prednisolone (or analogues) in a dose more than 10 mg/day or dose is unstable during 4 weeks prior to informed consent signing, requirement in non-steroid antiinflammatory drugs if their dose was not stable during last 8 weeks prior to informed consent signing.

Patient has inflammatory joint disease otherwise than rheumatoid arthritis or systemic autoimmune diseases.

Full list of inclusion and exclusion criteria can be found in Study Protocol.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Acellbia + methotrexate

106 patients of this group will receive methotrexate in combination with a drug Acellbia to be used at a dose of 600 mg as a slow intravenous infusion carried out on day 1 and day 15.

If a follow-up examination at 24 weeks or later (up to 48 weeks) reveals that the patient still has active arthritis (evaluation index DAS28-4 (ESR)> 2,6 points), the therapy with Acellbia is repeated by the same scheme - 2 infusion at a dose of 600 mg at intervals of 14 days.

Acellbia is rituximab biosimilar, monoclonal antibody which binds CD20.
Other Names:
  • rituximab
Placebo Comparator: Placebo + methotrexate

53 patients of this group will receive methotrexate in combination with a placebo to be used as a slow intravenous infusion carried out on day 1 and day 15.

If a follow-up examination at 24 weeks or later (up to 48 weeks) reveals that the patient still has active arthritis (evaluation index DAS28-4 (ESR)> 2,6 points), the patient receives open therapy with Acellbia is initiated: 2 infusion at a dose of 600 mg at intervals of 14 days.

Acellbia is rituximab biosimilar, monoclonal antibody which binds CD20.
Other Names:
  • rituximab
Placebo solution will look identical to the Acellbia solution.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of patients who developed ACR20 response on 24 week of therapy
Time Frame: Week 24
The proportion of patients achieving at least a 20% improvement in ACR criteria at 24 weeks of therapy.
Week 24

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of patients who developed ACR50 and ACR70 response on 24 week of therapy
Time Frame: Week 24
The proportion of patients achieving at least 50% and 70% improvement in ACR criteria at 24 weeks of therapy.
Week 24
Percentage of patients who developed ACR20, ACR50 and ACR70 response on 16 week of therapy
Time Frame: Week 16
The proportion of patients achieving at least 20%, 50% and 70% improvement in ACR criteria after 16 weeks of therapy.
Week 16
Change in average DAS28-4 (ESR) score after 24 weeks of therapy
Time Frame: Week 24
Change in average DAS28-4 (ESR) score after 24 weeks of therapy
Week 24
Change in average HAQ-DI score after 24 weeks of therapy
Time Frame: Week 24
Week 24
Change in average score according to modified Sharp method of assessment after 24 weeks of therapy
Time Frame: Week 24
Week 24
Change in average score of erosions according to modified Sharp method of assessment after 24 weeks of therapy
Time Frame: Week 24
Week 24
Change in average score of joint spase narrowing according to modified Sharp method of assessment after 24 weeks of therapy
Time Frame: Week 24
Week 24
Percentage of patients with progression of disease according to modified Steinbrocker method of assessment after 24 weeks of treatment
Time Frame: Week 24
Week 24
Percentage of patients who developed ACR20, ACR50 and ACR70 response on 52 week of therapy
Time Frame: Week 52
The proportion of patients achieving at least 20%, 50% and 70% improvement in ACR criteria after 52 weeks of therapy.
Week 52
Change in average DAS28-4 (ESR) score after 52 weeks of therapy
Time Frame: Week 52
Change in average DAS28-4 (ESR) score after 52 weeks of therapy
Week 52
Change in average HAQ-DI score after 52 weeks of therapy
Time Frame: Week 52
Week 52
Change in average score according to modified Sharp method of assessment after 52 weeks of therapy
Time Frame: Week 52
Week 52
Change in average score of erosions according to modified Sharp method of assessment after 52 weeks of therapy
Time Frame: Week 52
Week 52
Change in average score of joint space narrowing according to modified Sharp method of assessment after 52 weeks of therapy
Time Frame: Week 52
Week 52
Percentage of patients with progression of disease according to modified Steinbrocker method of assessment after 52 weeks of treatment
Time Frame: Week 52
Week 52
Frequency and severity of AE/SAE
Time Frame: 52 weeks
Frequency and severity of AE/SAE in patients who received at least one injection of study drug/placebo
52 weeks
Frequency of AE 3-4 grade CTCAE 4.03
Time Frame: 52 weeks
Frequency of AE 3-4 grade CTCAE 4.03 in patients who received at least one injection of study drug/placebo
52 weeks
Frequency of premature withdrawal due to AE/SAE
Time Frame: 52 weeks
52 weeks
Percentage of patients who have developed binding and neutralizing antibodies to rituximab on week 24 and week 52
Time Frame: Week 24, Week 52
Week 24, Week 52

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 1, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

August 1, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 4, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 15, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

April 20, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 25, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 24, 2018

Last Verified

January 1, 2018

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Rheumatoid Arthritis

Clinical Trials on Methotrexate

3
Subscribe