Functional Outcome Measures With Vibrotactile Feedback to Prostheses

June 25, 2018 updated by: Isabella Shvartz, Hadassah Medical Organization

The Effects of Adding Vibrotactile Feedback to Prostheses on Functional Outcome Measures of Transradial Amputation Prosthetic Users

Investigators wish to evaluate the effects of adding VTF to upper limb prostheses on functional outcome measures of upper limb prosthetic users.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Detailed Description

Investigators will perform three experiments:

  1. Investigators will add vibrotactile feedback to prosthetic users during the execution of a standardized functional test and performance of simple grasping tasks, with a disruption to the normal visual feedback, and examine whether their performance and arm kinematics are improved with tactile feedback;
  2. Investigators will examine the effects of adding the feedback to a prosthesis on the performance and visual attention during a dual task assignment in prosthetic users, and
  3. Investigators will provide prosthetic users with the feedback, to use it at their natural surroundings for a week, and study the reported activity and satisfaction levels.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

10

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Jerusalem, Israel, 91240
        • Hadassah Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years to 78 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Unilateral transradial amputee
  • Using a transradial myoelectric prosthesis
  • Ability to follow simple instructions, understand and sign an informed consent form
  • Normal or corrected eyesight

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Elbow or wrist disarticulation or partial hand amputations
  • Neuropathy or skin ulcers on the amputated limb

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Vibrotactile feedback
Vibrotactile system - comprises of force sensors, attached to the fingertips of the prosthetic hand, and a set of 8 vibration actuators attached to a fabric arm cuff. When the subject applies force on the sensors with his prosthetic hand, he receives a vibration on the skin of his arm. The sensors and actuators are connected to an electronic control board, which transforms the resistance from the sensors to an electric signal that activates the vibration actuators.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Orthotics and Prosthetics User Survey-Upper Extremity Functional Status
Time Frame: 2 weeks
A subjective questionnaire concerning the ability to perform daily tasks. The score ranges from 23 to 115.
2 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Modified Box & Blocks test
Time Frame: 2 weeks
This test is aimed to assess unilateral gross manual dexterity. The test comprises of a two-compartment box and 16 cube blocks.The subject is instructed to transport the blocks as possible over the partition into the opposite compartment. The time in seconds is measured.
2 weeks
Time to complete dual tasking test
Time Frame: 2 weeks
The time needed to complete grasping tasks while playing a simple computer game with the other hand is measured in seconds.
2 weeks
Activity
Time Frame: 2 weeks
In order to record the actual use of the prosthesis in the natural environment of the subject, a wireless activity monitor that can be easily attached to the prosthesis will be used. The output measure of the activity monitor are "activity counts".
2 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Study Director: Sigal Portnoy, PhD, Hadassah Medical Organization

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

April 1, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 1, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

February 1, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 13, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 22, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

April 25, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 27, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 25, 2018

Last Verified

June 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • VTF- HMO-CTIL

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Undecided

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Unilateral Transradial Amputation

Clinical Trials on Vibrotactile feedback system

3
Subscribe