- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT02764814
In Vivo Confocal Microscopic Analysis of Corneal Nerve Changes After ProKera Slim® for Dry Eye
November 21, 2016 updated by: Tissue Tech Inc.
Prospective controlled pilot study to compare the outcome of ProKera® (PK) and conventional treatment in patients with moderate to severe Dry Eye Disease (DED)
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
20
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
Illinois
-
Tinley Park, Illinois, United States, 60477
- Thomas John Vision Institute, P.C.
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
21 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Genders Eligible for Study
All
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Subjects with moderate to severe DED (Grade 2-4 DEWS)
- Age range: 21 years and older.
- Both genders and all ethnic groups comparable with the local community.
- Subjects able to understand and willing to sign a written informed consent.
- Subjects able and willing to cooperate with investigational plan.
- Subjects able and willing to complete postoperative follow-up.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Symblepharon or lid abnormality preventing ProKera placement.
- Ocular infection within 14 days prior to study entry.
- Active ocular allergies.
- Previous ocular surgery or injury within 3 months before enrollment.
- Previous brain surgery, or Trigeminal nerve damage.
- Other conditions that may affect corneal nerves such as diabetes, thyroid disorders.
- Contact lens wearers.
- Pregnancy or subject expecting to be pregnant.
- Inability or unwillingness of subject to give written informed consent.
- Subjects with known intolerance to PK.
- Subjects use concomitant therapy that affects tear functions or ocular surface integrity.
- Subjects currently engaged in another clinical trial.
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
No Intervention: Control
no intervention
|
|
Active Comparator: Treatment
subjects receiving cryopreserved amniotic membrane
|
subjects will receive cryopreserved amniotic membrane
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Short-term efficacy in terms of corneal nerve regeneration
Time Frame: Change from Baseline to 1 month
|
Assessed by corneal topography
|
Change from Baseline to 1 month
|
Short-term efficacy in terms of ocular surface integrity
Time Frame: Change from Baseline to 1 month
|
Assessed by in vivo confocal microscopy
|
Change from Baseline to 1 month
|
Short-term efficacy in terms of corneal sensitivity
Time Frame: Change from Baseline to 1 month
|
Change from Baseline to 1 month
|
|
Short-term efficacy in terms of ocular clinical symptoms
Time Frame: Change from Baseline to 1 month
|
Assessed by SPEED questionnaire, pain score, and dry eye workshop grading
|
Change from Baseline to 1 month
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Long-term efficacy in terms of corneal nerve regeneration
Time Frame: Change from Baseline to 3 month
|
Assessed by corneal topography
|
Change from Baseline to 3 month
|
Long-term efficacy in terms of ocular surface integrity
Time Frame: Change from Baseline to 3 month
|
Assessed by in vivo confocal microscopy
|
Change from Baseline to 3 month
|
Long-term efficacy in terms of corneal sensitivity
Time Frame: Change from Baseline to 3 month
|
Change from Baseline to 3 month
|
|
Long-term efficacy in terms of ocular clinical symptoms
Time Frame: Change from Baseline to 3 month
|
Assessed by SPEED questionnaire, pain score, and dry eye workshop grading
|
Change from Baseline to 3 month
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Thomas John, MD, Thomas John Vision Institute
Publications and helpful links
The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start
July 1, 2015
Primary Completion (Actual)
September 1, 2016
Study Completion (Actual)
November 1, 2016
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
April 25, 2016
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
May 3, 2016
First Posted (Estimate)
May 6, 2016
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimate)
November 22, 2016
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
November 21, 2016
Last Verified
August 1, 2016
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- P014-03
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Dry Eye Disease
-
Bausch & Lomb IncorporatedCompletedDry Eye Disease (DED)United States
-
Gordon Schanzlin New VisionCompletedDry Eye | Dry Eye Disease | Evaporative Dry Eye | Kerato Conjunctivitis Sicca | Evaporative Dry Eye Disease | Dry Eye, EvaporativeUnited States
-
Laboratorios Sophia S.A de C.V.Not yet recruitingOcular Surface Disease | Dry Eye Disease | Dry Eye Sensation
-
AllerganCompletedDry Eye Syndrome | Dry Eye DiseaseUnited States
-
Senju Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.CompletedDry Eye Syndrome | Dry Eye DiseaseUnited States
-
LantibioRiver Plate Biotechnology, Inc.; Rx Development Resources, LLCCompletedSafety and Efficacy Assessment of Vismed® (Sodium Hyaluronate) for the Treatment of Dry Eye SyndromeDry Eye DiseaseUnited States
-
Fundación Oftalmológica Los AndesAlcon ResearchNot yet recruitingCataract | Dry Eye Syndrome | Dry Eye Disease | Phacoemulsification | Evaporative Dry Eye
-
Vienna Institute for Research in Ocular SurgeryTerminated
-
Novaliq GmbHCompletedDry Eye Disease (DED)United States
-
Novaliq GmbHCompletedDry Eye Disease (DED)United States
Clinical Trials on Cryopreserved amniotic membrane
-
Tissue Tech Inc.CompletedCorneal Dystrophy, Epithelial Basement MembraneUnited States
-
Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Center, OhioTerminatedTendon TearsUnited States
-
Amniox Medical, Inc.TerminatedFoot Ulcer, DiabeticUnited States
-
Tissue Tech Inc.Terminated
-
Klinikum Chemnitz gGmbHTechnische Universität DresdenCompletedCorneal Ulcers | Corneal MeltingGermany
-
Red de Terapia CelularUniversidad de Murcia; Hospital Universitario Virgen de la Arrixaca; MurciaSalud and other collaboratorsCompleted
-
Postgraduate Institute of Dental Sciences RohtakUnknown
-
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de ParisUnknownUlcer | Epidermolysis Bullosa Dystrophica, RecessiveFrance
-
Hams Hamed AbdelrahmanActive, not recruiting
-
University of UtahUnknownAtrial FibrillationUnited States