In Vivo Confocal Microscopic Analysis of Corneal Nerve Changes After ProKera Slim® for Dry Eye

November 21, 2016 updated by: Tissue Tech Inc.
Prospective controlled pilot study to compare the outcome of ProKera® (PK) and conventional treatment in patients with moderate to severe Dry Eye Disease (DED)

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

20

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Illinois
      • Tinley Park, Illinois, United States, 60477
        • Thomas John Vision Institute, P.C.

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

21 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Subjects with moderate to severe DED (Grade 2-4 DEWS)
  • Age range: 21 years and older.
  • Both genders and all ethnic groups comparable with the local community.
  • Subjects able to understand and willing to sign a written informed consent.
  • Subjects able and willing to cooperate with investigational plan.
  • Subjects able and willing to complete postoperative follow-up.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Symblepharon or lid abnormality preventing ProKera placement.
  • Ocular infection within 14 days prior to study entry.
  • Active ocular allergies.
  • Previous ocular surgery or injury within 3 months before enrollment.
  • Previous brain surgery, or Trigeminal nerve damage.
  • Other conditions that may affect corneal nerves such as diabetes, thyroid disorders.
  • Contact lens wearers.
  • Pregnancy or subject expecting to be pregnant.
  • Inability or unwillingness of subject to give written informed consent.
  • Subjects with known intolerance to PK.
  • Subjects use concomitant therapy that affects tear functions or ocular surface integrity.
  • Subjects currently engaged in another clinical trial.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
No Intervention: Control
no intervention
Active Comparator: Treatment
subjects receiving cryopreserved amniotic membrane
subjects will receive cryopreserved amniotic membrane
Other Names:
  • ProKera Slim

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Short-term efficacy in terms of corneal nerve regeneration
Time Frame: Change from Baseline to 1 month
Assessed by corneal topography
Change from Baseline to 1 month
Short-term efficacy in terms of ocular surface integrity
Time Frame: Change from Baseline to 1 month
Assessed by in vivo confocal microscopy
Change from Baseline to 1 month
Short-term efficacy in terms of corneal sensitivity
Time Frame: Change from Baseline to 1 month
Change from Baseline to 1 month
Short-term efficacy in terms of ocular clinical symptoms
Time Frame: Change from Baseline to 1 month
Assessed by SPEED questionnaire, pain score, and dry eye workshop grading
Change from Baseline to 1 month

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Long-term efficacy in terms of corneal nerve regeneration
Time Frame: Change from Baseline to 3 month
Assessed by corneal topography
Change from Baseline to 3 month
Long-term efficacy in terms of ocular surface integrity
Time Frame: Change from Baseline to 3 month
Assessed by in vivo confocal microscopy
Change from Baseline to 3 month
Long-term efficacy in terms of corneal sensitivity
Time Frame: Change from Baseline to 3 month
Change from Baseline to 3 month
Long-term efficacy in terms of ocular clinical symptoms
Time Frame: Change from Baseline to 3 month
Assessed by SPEED questionnaire, pain score, and dry eye workshop grading
Change from Baseline to 3 month

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Thomas John, MD, Thomas John Vision Institute

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

July 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 1, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

November 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 25, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 3, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

May 6, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

November 22, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 21, 2016

Last Verified

August 1, 2016

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Dry Eye Disease

Clinical Trials on Cryopreserved amniotic membrane

3
Subscribe