Evaluation of the Association Between Osteoporosis and Postural Balance in Postmenopausal Women

May 10, 2016 updated by: Guilherme Carlos Brech, University of Sao Paulo
The incidence of osteoporosis has been increasing, as have fractures resulting from falls.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The overall objective of this study is to evaluate bipodal postural balance in postmenopausal women with and without lumbar osteoporosis. The specific objective is to determine the relationship between the degree of thoracic kyphosis and dosing of 25 OH vitamin D with postural balance in postmenopausal women with lumbar osteoporosis.

One hundred and twenty-six postmenopausal women between 55-65 years of age were evaluated and separated into two groups according to the bone mineral density values of their lumbar spine: the osteoporosis group and the control group.

Functional mobility was evaluated through the Timed Up and Go Test. Postural balance was evaluated using a AccuSway® model portable force platform, in standard standing position, with eyes open and closed, for 60". Data were collected, stored, and processed by the Balance Clinic® program, configured to 100 Hz frequency, with a frequency cut-off filter at 10 Hz.

Muscle strength was evaluated via a Biodex® isokinetic dynamometer in the concentric/concentric knee extension mode at 60o/s.

Dosing of 25 OH vitamin D and thoracic spine x-rays to determine the degree of kyphosis measured by the Cobb angle were performed in the osteoporosis group.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

126

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

55 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

Postmenopausal women

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • absence of impairment of the vestibular, proprioceptive, auditory or neurological system, and/or any mental disturbances or disorders;
  • no use of medications that might compromise postural balance;
  • absence of lesions, surgery or disease that might have caused lower-limb joint limitations over the previous six months;
  • absence of lower-limb dysmetria;
  • presence of clinically normal gait, without claudication.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • the presence of pain or inability to complete any of the tests
  • along with occurrences of blood pressure increase before the strength evaluation.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental
women with osteoporosis
Control
women without osteoporosis

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
International Physical Activity Questionnaire
Time Frame: 1 day
1 day

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Functional mobility
Time Frame: 1 day
Was evaluated through the Timed Up and Go Test
1 day

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Postural balance
Time Frame: 1 day
Was evaluated using a AccuSway® model portable force platform, in standard standing position, with eyes open and closed, for 60". Data were collected, stored, and processed by the Balance Clinic® program, configured to 100 Hz frequency, with a frequency cut-off filter at 10 Hz.
1 day
Muscle strength
Time Frame: 1 day
Was evaluated via a Biodex® isokinetic dynamometer in the concentric/concentric knee extension mode at 60o/s.
1 day
Vitamin D level
Time Frame: 1 day
Dosing of 25 OH vitamin D in a blood test
1 day
Degree of kyphosis
Time Frame: 1 day
Thoracic spine x-rays to determine the degree of kyphosis measured by the Cobb angle were performed in the osteoporosis group
1 day

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

July 1, 2009

Primary Completion (Actual)

July 1, 2012

Study Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2012

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 10, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 10, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

May 13, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

May 13, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 10, 2016

Last Verified

May 1, 2016

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Postural Balance

Clinical Trials on Biomechanical analysis

3
Subscribe