Microsurgical Treatment of Breast Cancer-related Lymphedema by Lymphaticovenous Anastomosis

October 5, 2023 updated by: Maastricht University Medical Center

Improving the Quality of Life of Patients With Breast Cancer-related Lymphedema by Lymphaticovenous Anastomosis (LVA): A Randomized Controlled Trial

Research question: Is lymphaticovenous anastomosis (LVA) for the treatment of breast cancer-related lymphedema of the arm (BCRL) more effective and cost-effective compared to standard conservative treatment? Hypothesis: LVA improves the health-related quality of life of patients who developed BCRL after breast cancer treatment and is cost-effective compared to conservative treatment. Study design: A multicenter randomised controlled trial (RCT) consisting of two treatment groups: conservative treatment (group A) and LVA (group B). The study is conducted in Maastricht University Medical Center, Radboud University Medical Center, Zuyderland Medical Center and Canisius-Wilhelmina Hospital. Study population: Women over 18 years old who underwent (axillary) treatment for breast cancer presenting with early stage lymphedema of the arm for which they received at least three months conservative treatment Intervention: LVA involves anastomosing lymphatic vessels to small veins to bypass obstructions in the lymphatic system.

Usual care: Complex decongestive therapy (CDT) which includes skin care, manual lymphatic drainage, and compression therapy. Outcome measures: The primary outcome is health-related quality of life after 12 months follow-up measured with the Lymph-ICF questionnaire. Secondary outcomes are (in)direct costs, QALYs, cost-effectiveness ratio, the discontinuation rate of conservative treatment, and excess limb volume. Sample size: A total of 120 patients will be included and randomised in two groups of 60 patients each.

Cost-effectiveness analysis: A trial-based economic evaluation is performed from the societal perspective to determine the cost-effectiveness, expressed in an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) (i.e. cost per QALY gained), of LVA compared to CDT. Direct and indirect cost data is collected on the patient-level. The difference in QALYs is assessed with the EQ-5D-5L questionnaire. A Budget Impact Analysis (BIA) will be performed to analyse the financial consequences related to implementing LVA. Time schedule: Patient inclusion will take maximally 21 months. With a follow-up of 24 months, the total study period will be 48 months. The last three months are used for data analysis. Outcome assessment is at inclusion (before randomisation) and 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months later.

Study Overview

Status

Active, not recruiting

Conditions

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

100

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Gelderland
      • Nijmegen, Gelderland, Netherlands, 6526 GA
        • Radboud University Medical Center
    • Limburg
      • Maastricht, Limburg, Netherlands, 6229 HX
        • Yasmine Jonis

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 99 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Women over 18 years old
  • Treated for early stage breast cancer and who underwent an sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB), axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) or axillary radiotherapy
  • Early stage lymphedema of the arm (ISL classification stage I/IIa; pitting edema without fibrosis) with viable lymphatic vessels as determined by indocyanin green (ICG) lymphography
  • Already received at least three months of complex decongestive therapy (CDT) prior to inclusion
  • Primary breast cancer
  • Unilateral lymphedema
  • Informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Male sex
  • Late stage lymphedema of the arm (ISL classification IIb/III lymphedema) with evident fat deposition and/or fibrosis
  • History of earlier lymph reconstruction efforts
  • Recurrent breast cancer
  • Distant breast cancer metastases
  • Bilateral lymphedema
  • Primary congenital lymphedema
  • Non-viable lymphatic system as determined by ICG lymphography

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
No Intervention: Complex decongestive therapy
Group A will continue complex decongestive therapy consisting of skin care, manual lymphatic drainage, and compression therapy using compression stockings.
Experimental: Lymphaticovenous anastomosis (LVA)
Group B will undergo an LVA procedure under local anesthesia in surgical daycare setting. Patients are not allowed to wear compression stockings or have decongestive therapy for four weeks after the surgery.
LVA is a minimally invasive procedure that can be performed under local anesthesia. Indocyanine green (ICG) lymphography is used to visualize the (obstructed) lymphatic vessels. When using the images as a guide, the lymphatic pathways and the sites for incisions for lymphaticovenous anastomoses are marked with a pen. The patient's limb is then prepared for surgery. Under a surgical microscope the lymphatic vessels are identified and viable lymphatic vessels are anastomosed to similarly sized adjacent recipient venules in the subdermal plane.
Other Names:
  • LVA

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Health-related quality of life: Lymph-ICF questionnaire
Time Frame: 12 months
To assess the efficacy of the treatment on disease-related symptoms we will use the "Lymphedema Functioning, Disability and Health" (Lymph-ICF)" questionnaire. This disease-specific questionnaire assesses the impairments in function, activity limitations, and participation restrictions of patients with arm lymphedema. This is a validated questionnaire, based on 5 domains with 29 questions. Each of the 29 questions corresponds to a score between 0-100. The total score on the Lymph-ICF is equal to the sum of the scores on the questions divided by the total number of answered questions. A higher score on the Lymph-ICF indicates more problems with functioning related to arm lymphedema.
12 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Cost-effectiveness of LVA compared to complex decongestive therapy
Time Frame: 24 months
A trial-based economic evaluation is performed to determine the cost-effectiveness of LVA compared to complex decongestive therapy from the societal perspective. Cost data is collected on the patient-level and includes health care related costs, costs to patient and family, and costs due to lost productivity. The primary outcome measure for the effects is the quality-adjusted life year (QALY). Cost-effectiveness is expressed in an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) (i.e. cost per QALY gained). In addition, a Budget Impact Analysis (BIA) will be performed from a budget holder perspective.
24 months
Excess limb volume
Time Frame: 24 months
The relative arm volume is measured using the water displacement method (Bravometer), 3D volumetry, and circumference measurement. The volume of the affected arm is compared to the volume of the unaffected arm.
24 months
Discontinuation rate conservative therapy
Time Frame: 24 months
The number of patients who are able to discontinue conservative therapy, i.e. no longer have to wear compression stockings or no more visits to the therapist, will be registered.
24 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: René Van der Hulst, MD, PhD, Maastricht University Medical Center
  • Principal Investigator: Shan Shan Qiu Shao, MD, PhD, Maastricht University Medical Center

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 1, 2019

Primary Completion (Estimated)

August 1, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 11, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 2, 2016

First Posted (Estimated)

June 3, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 6, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 5, 2023

Last Verified

October 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • NL67059.068.18

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Lymphedema

Clinical Trials on Lymphaticovenous anastomosis (LVA)

3
Subscribe