Immobilization of Postoperative Distal Radius Fractures

March 17, 2021 updated by: University of California, San Francisco

The management of distal radius fractures has been in a state of evolution over the past 30 years. Treatment has become increasingly focused on obtaining a stable, internal construct for quick return to normal, daily activities. With the advent of volar locking plates, the wrist fracture is stable before the patient leaves the operating room. As surgical plate and screw constructs become more stable, the need for casting and splinting may be less.

The presumptive "next step" in operative management of distal radius fractures is to do away with the postoperative splint. A review of the available English language literature failed to reveal any studies evaluating the use of postoperative splinting and patient outcomes.

This prospective, randomized study was designed to investigate the use of temporary plaster splints versus removable over-the-counter splits versus soft dressings for post-operative treatment of extra-articular and intra-articular distal radius fractures. The patients will be followed for 12 months evaluating maintenance of fracture reduction and patient outcomes.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

A prospective study using multiple surgeons at multiple centers (Community Regional Medical Center and Sierra Pacific Orthopaedic Center) investigating post-operative management of extra and intra articular distal radius fractures treated with volar locking plates. Post-operative management for 2 weeks immediately following surgery will consist of placing 1/3 of patients in a short arm, custom-made, plaster splint, 1/3 with a removable Velcro wrist splint, and 1/3 with a soft dressing. The Velcro wrist brace group will be asked to wear the brace as much as possible during the two weeks and the soft dressing may be removed by the patient on the third day after surgery.

  • The custom plaster splint is the historical standard. The surgical incision is dressed with non-stick gauze, 4x4 gauze pads, cotton padding, a plaster splint applied to the palmar surface of the palm and forearm, and then a cloth wrap to keep it all in place.
  • The Velcro wrist brace is a commercially available over-the-counter splint which will initially be fitted over a thin layer of non-stick gauze, 4x4 gauze, and cotton padding.
  • Patients in the soft dressing group will have non-stick gauze, 4x4 gauze, cotton padding, and a cloth wrap. It will be the same dressing as the custom splint without the plaster slab.

Patients will be randomized using REDCap Randomization module after being consented to participate in the study by the primary investigator or sub-investigator. Each investigator will have the option during and/or after surgery to remove the patient from the group they have been randomized into and treat them as they see appropriate. These patients would be documented but removed from the study follow up.

Patient satisfaction will be evaluated subjectively with the PRWE (Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation) as well as the Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (Quick-DASH) score. Radiographs will be taken at 2, 6, 12, and 24 weeks postoperatively to measure fracture alignment and healing. Patient reported pain level, range of motion, grip, and pinch strength will be recorded at each visit as well as at a final 1 year follow-up visit. Any complication will be noted. All of these visits are part of the standard of care. The only additional part of their visit would be the brief survey including the QuickDASH and PRWE that they complete with an orthopaedic surgery resident during their visit. In addition at the first follow up appointment at 2 weeks post-surgery, patients will be asked about their satisfaction with the mobility of their wrist and those in the Velcro brace will be asked how often they wore the brace. All data will be collected on a data collection sheet and then entered into a database

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

20

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • California
      • Fresno, California, United States, 93720
        • Sierra Pacific Orthopaedic Center
      • Fresno, California, United States, 93721
        • Community Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • extra and intra articular distal radius fractures treated with distal locking plates

Exclusion Criteria:

  • patients with additional injuries to the ipsilateral wrist such as, distal radial ulnar joint (DRUJ) instability and associated unstable ulna fractures.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Plaster Splint
The custom plaster splint is the historical standard. The surgical incision is dressed with non-stick gauze, 4x4 gauze pads, cotton padding, a plaster splint applied to the palmar surface of the palm and forearm, and then a cloth wrap to keep it all in place. Patients will wear the plaster splint for 2 weeks post-op.
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Velcro Brace
The Velcro wrist brace is a commercially available over-the-counter splint which will initially be fitted over a thin layer of non-stick gauze, 4x4 gauze, and cotton padding. Patients will be asked to wear the brace as much as possible for the first 2 weeks post-op.
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Soft Dressing
Patients in the soft dressing group will have non-stick gauze, 4X4 gauze, cotton padding, and a cloth wrap. It will be the same dressing as the custom splint without the plaster slab. Patients wear the soft dressing for the first three days post-op.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Patient Rated Wrist Evaluation
Time Frame: 24 weeks
24 weeks
Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (Quick-DASH) score
Time Frame: 24 weeks
24 weeks
Pain Scale (on a scale from 1-10)
Time Frame: 24 weeks
24 weeks
Grip Strength measured in kilograms
Time Frame: 24 weeks
24 weeks
Pinch Strength measured in kilograms
Time Frame: 24 weeks
24 weeks
Range of Motion measured in degrees
Time Frame: 24 weeks
24 weeks
Radiographic evidence of healing
Time Frame: 24 weeks
Do the x-rays show evidence of bone healing? Yes/No
24 weeks
Complications that required further medical attention
Time Frame: 24 weeks
Were there any complications that required further medical attention within the first 6 month after surgery?
24 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Patient Rated Wrist Evaluation
Time Frame: 2 weeks
2 weeks
Patient Rated Wrist Evaluation
Time Frame: 6 weeks
6 weeks
Patient Rated Wrist Evaluation
Time Frame: 12 weeks
12 weeks
Patient Rated Wrist Evaluation
Time Frame: 52 weeks
52 weeks
Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (Quick-DASH) score
Time Frame: 2 weeks
2 weeks
Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (Quick-DASH) score
Time Frame: 6 weeks
6 weeks
Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (Quick-DASH) score
Time Frame: 12 weeks
12 weeks
Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (Quick-DASH) score
Time Frame: 52 weeks
52 weeks
Pain Scale (on a scale from 1-10)
Time Frame: 2 weeks
2 weeks
Pain Scale (on a scale from 1-10)
Time Frame: 6 weeks
6 weeks
Pain Scale (on a scale from 1-10)
Time Frame: 12 weeks
12 weeks
Pain Scale (on a scale from 1-10)
Time Frame: 52 weeks
52 weeks
Radiographic evidence of healing
Time Frame: 2 weeks
Do the x-rays show evidence of bone healing? Yes/No
2 weeks
Radiographic evidence of healing
Time Frame: 6 weeks
Do the x-rays show evidence of bone healing? Yes/No
6 weeks
Radiographic evidence of healing
Time Frame: 12 weeks
Do the x-rays show evidence of bone healing? Yes/No
12 weeks
Complications that required further medical attention
Time Frame: 2 weeks
Were there any complications that required further medical attention within the first 6 month after surgery?
2 weeks
Complications that required further medical attention
Time Frame: 6 weeks
Were there any complications that required further medical attention within the first 6 month after surgery?
6 weeks
Complications that required further medical attention
Time Frame: 12 weeks
Were there any complications that required further medical attention within the first 6 month after surgery?
12 weeks
Complications that required further medical attention
Time Frame: 52 weeks
Were there any complications that required further medical attention within the first 6 month after surgery?
52 weeks
Range of Motion measured in degrees
Time Frame: 2 weeks
2 weeks
Range of Motion measured in degrees
Time Frame: 6 weeks
6 weeks
Range of Motion measured in degrees
Time Frame: 12 weeks
12 weeks
Range of Motion measured in degrees
Time Frame: 52 weeks
52 weeks
Grip Strength measured in kilograms
Time Frame: 2 weeks
2 weeks
Grip Strength measured in kilograms
Time Frame: 6 weeks
6 weeks
Grip Strength measured in kilograms
Time Frame: 12 weeks
12 weeks
Grip Strength measured in kilograms
Time Frame: 52 weeks
52 weeks
Pinch Strength measured in kilograms
Time Frame: 2 weeks
2 weeks
Pinch Strength measured in kilograms
Time Frame: 6 weeks
6 weeks
Pinch Strength measured in kilograms
Time Frame: 12 weeks
12 weeks
Pinch Strength measured in kilograms
Time Frame: 52 weeks
52 weeks

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Mobility Satisfaction (Extremely, Very, Somewhat, Not at all)
Time Frame: 2
2

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Nathan Hoekzema, MD, UCSF - Fresno

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

July 1, 2016

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

April 19, 2020

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

April 19, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 2, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 13, 2016

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

June 16, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

March 22, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 17, 2021

Last Verified

March 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2016033

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

We will not share any individual participant data.

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Distal Radius Fractures

Clinical Trials on Plaster Splint

3
Subscribe