Comparison of Two Treatments for Acute Rotator Cuff Tendinopathy

February 25, 2019 updated by: Jean-Sébastien Roy, Laval University

Rest or Gradual Reloading in Acute Presentations of Rotator Cuff Tendinopathy - A Randomised Control Trial

The primary objective of this study is to compare the short-term effectiveness (2 and 6 weeks following the start of the rehabilitation program), in terms of symptoms and functional limitations, of a rehabilitation program centered on gradual reloading to a rehabilitation program centered on rest and cryotherapy in individuals with acute rotator cuff tendinopathy. The secondary objective is to explore the effects of these programs on shoulder control (acromiohumeral distance), subacromial structures (supraspinatus tendon thickness) and central pain modulation. The hypothesis is that the rehabilitation program centered on gradual reloading will lead to a faster improvement at week 2 and 6 when compared to the program centered on rest and cryotherapy.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

44 adults (aged between 18 and 65) with acute (< 6 weeks) unilateral symptomatic RC tendinopathy will be recruited.This single-blind (assessor), parallel-group RCT will include three evaluation sessions over 6 weeks (baseline, week 2, week 6) and one meeting with the treating physiotherapist (right after the baseline evaluation). All participants will take part in the baseline evaluation. They will first complete a questionnaire on sociodemographic, symptomatology and comorbidity, as well as self-administered questionnaires that evaluate symptoms and functional limitations (DASH, WORC and BPI). Then, ultrasonographic (US) measurements of AHD and of the supraspinatus tendon and subacromial bursal thickness will be conducted. Thereafter, pain inhibitory control will be assessed using conditioned pain modulation. Finally, the corticospinal excitability of the infraspinatus muscle will be evaluated. Thereafter, participants will be randomly assigned to one of two intervention groups, and then take part in their assigned home program. At week 2 and 6, the self-administered questionnaires will be re-administered (by phone for the week 6 evaluation). A global rating of change question (with % of change since baseline) will also be completed at week 2 and 6. US measurements, conditioned pain modulation and corticospinal excitability will only be revaluated at week 2. To evaluate the effectiveness of blinding, the assessor will complete a question related to his/her opinion of the allocation at week 2. The study will be carried out at the Centre interdisciplinaire de recherche en réadaptation et en intégration sociale (CIRRIS) by two different physiotherapists and in two different laboratories. Ethics approval will be obtained from Institutional Review Board of IRDPQ.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

44

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Quebec
      • Quebec City, Quebec, Canada
        • Center for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation and Social Integration (CIRRIS)

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Between 18 and 65 years old
  • Acute (< 6 weeks) unilateral symptomatic rotator cuff tendinopathy
  • Positive sign in each of the following categories: a) painful arc of movement, b) positive Neer or Kennedy-Hawkins tests, and c) pain on resisted isometric lateral rotation or abduction, or positive Jobe test.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Fracture at the symptomatic upper limb;
  • Previous neck or shoulder surgery;
  • Shoulder pain reproduced during active neck movement;
  • Shoulder capsulitis;
  • Clinical signs of a full thickness rotator cuff tear;
  • Rheumatoid, inflammatory, or neurological diseases;
  • Behavioural or cognitive problems.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Gradual reloading
Participants will be asked to perform isometric strengthening exercises in lateral rotation and abduction (see Table 1). In a sitting position (with folded towel between body and arm), participants will place their affected arm by the side with the elbow gently tucked in close to the body, elbow flexed at 90°, and the thumb pointing upwards. The opposite hand (the uninvolved side) will resist the lateral rotation and abduction. They will be asked to push against the uninvolved hand, building up to sub-maximal pressure (approximately 50% to 75% of the maximum possible force; practice during the meeting with the treating physiotherapist using EMG recording) over five seconds.
Participants will be asked to perform isometric strengthening exercises in lateral rotation and abduction. Participants will place their affected arm by the side with the elbow gently tucked in close to the body, elbow flexed at 90°, and the thumb pointing upwards. The opposite hand will resist the lateral rotation and abduction. They will be asked to push against the uninvolved hand, building up to sub-maximal pressure (approximately 50% to 75% of the maximum possible force) over five seconds. Then the contraction will be slowly released. A maximum pain level of 5/10 will be accepted when performing the contraction. Elevation movements will also be performed 3 times a day in the frontal, sagittal and scapular plane.
Active Comparator: Rest and cryotherapy
Participants will be asked to apply ice wrap on their painful shoulder 3 times a day over the area of pain for 15 minutes. They will be asked to place the ice wrap inside a damp towel cloth (minimise the risk of an ice burn) and secure around the shoulder with a towel. After the 15 minutes, they will be asked to perform gentle, slow, pain free shoulder movements that do not provoke pain. All participants will be provided with a commercial ice wrap and a towel cloth. They will also be asked to avoid painful movements, working above shoulder level, repeated or sustained elevation movements and lifting weights.
Participants will be asked to apply ice wrap on their painful shoulder 3 times a day over the area of pain for 15 minutes. They will be asked to place the ice wrap inside a damp towel cloth (minimise the risk of an ice burn) and secure around the shoulder with a towel. After the 15 minutes, they will be asked to perform gentle, slow, pain free shoulder movements that do not provoke pain. All participants will be provided with a commercial ice wrap. They will also be asked to avoid painful movements, working above shoulder level, repeated or sustained elevation movements and lifting weights.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaire
Time Frame: Change from baseline at 2 weeks, change from baseline at 6 weeks
Generic questionnaire assessing any upper limb disorders
Change from baseline at 2 weeks, change from baseline at 6 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Western Ontario Rotator Cuff index
Time Frame: Change from baseline at 2 weeks, change from baseline at 6 weeks
Questionnaire specific to rotator cuff disorders
Change from baseline at 2 weeks, change from baseline at 6 weeks
Short form of Brief Pain Inventory (questions 1-6 only)
Time Frame: Change from baseline at 2 weeks, change from baseline at 6 weeks
Pain questionnaire
Change from baseline at 2 weeks, change from baseline at 6 weeks
Acromiohumeral distance in cm using LogiqE9 (GE Healthcare, Milwaukee, WI, USA) ultrasound scanner
Time Frame: Change from baseline at 2 weeks
Change from baseline at 2 weeks
Supraspinatus tendon thickness in mm using LogiqE9 (GE Healthcare, Milwaukee, WI, USA) ultrasound scanner
Time Frame: Change from baseline at 2 weeks
Change from baseline at 2 weeks
Percentage change in pain perception using Conditioned Pain Modulation equipment
Time Frame: Change from baseline at 2 weeks
This measurement represents the effectiveness of descending inhibitory mechanisms
Change from baseline at 2 weeks
Isometric shoulder external rotation strength
Time Frame: Change from baseline at 2 weeks
Measured using hand-held digital dynamometer
Change from baseline at 2 weeks
Isometric shoulder abduction strength
Time Frame: Change from baseline at 2 weeks
Measured using hand-held digital dynamometer
Change from baseline at 2 weeks
Shoulder flexion, external rotation at 0 degrees and 90 degrees abduction, internal rotation at 90 degrees abduction
Time Frame: Change from baseline at 2 weeks
Measured using a digital inclinometer
Change from baseline at 2 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 1, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 21, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 22, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

June 24, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 27, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 25, 2019

Last Verified

February 1, 2016

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Acute Rotator Cuff Tendinopathy

Clinical Trials on Gradual reloading

3
Subscribe