Impact of a Therapeutic Education Program of Patient on the Evolution of the Cardiovascular Chronic Disease (ETHEPAT)

February 8, 2022 updated by: University Hospital, Bordeaux

The Exploration Center for Prevention and Treatment of Atherosclerosis (CEPTA, Bordeaux Hospital University) showed that following myocardial infarct (MI) or ischemic stroke (TIA or stroke), the global management (medical and educational) of patients led to very long-term satisfactory results in terms of reduction of cardiovascular (CV) risk and morbidity and mortality. However, the specific effect of therapeutic education beyond the conventional treatment has never been an adequate assessment. The following at 1 year of this study will show the evolution of chronic long-term CV disease in patients who received therapeutic education, and to explain the mechanisms. The challenge of this project is to demonstrate for the first time the superiority of therapeutic education and conventional care and propose a modeling program for national diffusion.

Patients who experienced a CV event (MI, stroke) will be randomized into 2 groups of 165 patients each: 1) receiving conventional treatment alone; 2) receiving conventional treatment + CEPTA program. The study was built for a 1-year follow-up period, to demonstrate the impact of therapeutic education on evolution of risk factors, physical, psychological and social health of patients. The main benefit of this study for the patient is the implementation of an optimized treatment and long-term monitoring by a cardiology referral center.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Chronic cardiovascular diseases are the second cause of death in France, and represent a major public health issue. Recurrences are numerous, due to inadequate control of cardiovascular risk factors, despite significant drug prescription. Therapeutic education can help to improve the health of patients, physical and psychical.

The Exploration Center for Prevention and Treatment of Atherosclerosis (CEPTA, Bordeaux Hospital University) demonstrated that following myocardial infarction or stroke, the comprehensive care (medical and educational) of patients CEPTA led to results very satisfactory in terms of reduction of cardiovascular risk and morbidity and mortality. However, the specific effect of therapeutic education beyond the conventional treatment has never been a proper assessment. This study is a single-center prospective, randomized, controlled. The main objective is to find and explain the impact of the "therapeutic education program" in addition to optimized conventional therapy in post-MI or stroke patients, compared to an optimized conventional therapy alone . Patients will be randomized during hospitalization for their acute phase into two groups of 165 patients each. The first group receiving conventional therapy alone and the 2nd group receiving conventional treatment + the therapeutic education program. All patients benefit from traditional monitoring as provided for this type of patients, followed up for 3 months and 1 year.

In the first days after the acute event, patients benefit from the most appropriate treatment and receive guidance for their change in lifestyle, diet and smoking cessation. Optimal treatment will be prescribed to the output depending on cardiovascular status and risk factors.

Three months after cardiovascular events, patients will benefit from their assessment of atherosclerosis and its consequences on myocardial or neurological functions. Each patient will receive an assessment of risk factors (smoking, dietary habits and physical activity). Personalized advice will be issued. One participants group will receive the "conventional treatment + therapeutic education program (CEPTA program)".

The objectives of the therapeutic education associate:

  • Of learning objectives and acquisition of knowledge and self-care skills making the patient more autonomous and facilitating its adherence.
  • the objectives of acquiring coping skills (self-confidence, stress management, setting projects) to improve their quality of life.
  • the development objectives respects the relevant criteria of quality, realism and principle of educational progress.

The challenge of this project is to demonstrate for the first time the superiority of a conventional treatment + therapeutic education in this population, and to propose a model program for national broadcast.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

202

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Pessac, France, 33604
        • CEPTA (Centre d'Exploration, de Prévention et de Traitement de l'Athérosclérose), Hôpital Cardiologique du Haut-Lévêque

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 75 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients hospitalized for a cardiovascular event (myocardial infarction); Neurovascular attack (TIA or stroke)
  • Patients whose age is between 18 and 75 years
  • Patients who signed the informed consent after information about the study

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Subject participating or having participated in another study that alters conventional management of hospitalized patients for stroke, transient ischemic attack or myocardial infarction
  • Significant cognitive troubles making transmission of questionnaire impossible, or speech or understanding disorders (including non francophone patients)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Intervention group
Patients will benefit from a traditional follow-up as provided for this type of patients at 3 months and 1 year

The objectives of this therapeutic education program involve:

  • learning objectives and acquisition of knowledge and self-care skills making the patient more autonomous and facilitating its adherence.
  • the objectives of acquiring coping skills ( self-confidence , stress management , setting projects ) to improve their quality of life .
  • the development objectives respects the relevant criteria of quality , realism and principle of educational progress.
Active Comparator: Control group
Patients will benefit from a traditional follow-up as provided for this type of patients at 3 months and 1 year

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Difference measure of the risk factors score between baseline and 1 year of follow-up
Time Frame: Baseline to year 1
The sum of the different risk factors score is calculated at the baseline and the year 1. Then the difference between both is calculated.
Baseline to year 1

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Assessment of the improvement of at least one point of the risk score between baseline and 1 year of follow-up
Time Frame: Baseline to year 1
Each risk factor score is compared individually at the baseline and the year 1 to assess if at least one risk factor score improved from the Baseline (success or failure).
Baseline to year 1
Measure of the Framingham score giving a risk prediction of recurrent cardiovascular event
Time Frame: Day 1, month 3, year 1
Day 1, month 3, year 1

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Louis-Rachid SALMI, Pr, Unité de Soutien Méthodologique à la Recherche clinique et épidémiologique du CHU de Bordeaux

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 5, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 14, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

April 14, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 28, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 29, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

June 30, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 14, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 8, 2022

Last Verified

February 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Myocardial Infarction

Clinical Trials on Optimized conventional therapy alone

3
Subscribe