Ultrasound Diagnostic for Diaphragmatic Dysfunction in Reanimation (ECHODIAPH II)

Ultrasound Diagnostic for Diaphragmatic Dysfunction in Reanimation and Influence Over Mechanical Ventilation Weaning Period

Extubation is a crucial step when patients are being weaned from mechanical ventilator support. Indeed, the patient has to face an increasing burden imposed to the ventilation system. The ability to overcome this event will determine the patient survival. A warning signal could be very useful is this situation. 2 recent studies have shown that measuring diaphragmatic cupolas and muscular fibers thickening fraction could help to spot a population with a high risk of "diaphragmatic weakness", characterized by a high failure extubation rate. This study aims to verify that this kind of group of patients does exist.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

74

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Lyon, France, 69007
        • Centre Hospitalier Saint Joseph Saint Luc
      • Metz-Tessy, France, 74374
        • Centre Hospitalier Annecy Genevois
      • Poitiers, France, 86021
        • Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Poitiers

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Successful spontaneous breathing trial and extubation expected on the same day and 1 of the following criteria :
  • Age > 65
  • Mechanical ventilation during > 7 days
  • Cardiac history (ischemic, rhythmic or valve cardiopathy)
  • Respiratory history (documented or likely chronic respiratory failure)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient who is tracheotomized
  • Peripheric neuromuscular disease (myasthenia, myopathy)
  • Surgery circumstances that could affect the quality of the ultrasound exam (drains or bandages)
  • Pregnant woman
  • Age < 18

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: Single arm

All patients will have a diaphragmatic ultrasound in the 4 hours before the extubation.

  • a record of the right and left diaphragmatic cupolas run, with a chest approach and using a 4-5 MHz (megahertz) cardiac or abdominal sensor. 3 acquisitions for each side
  • a record of the diaphragm thickening at the right and left apposition zones with a 10-12 MHz (megahertz) vascular sensor. 3 acquisitions for each side

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Extubation success rate
Time Frame: 7 days after the reported extubation
Extubation success rate, defined as no reintubation 7 days after the reporting extubation
7 days after the reported extubation

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Length of stay in reanimation unit (days)
Time Frame: At discharge of reanimation unit (up to 1 year)
At discharge of reanimation unit (up to 1 year)
Length of mechanical ventilation
Time Frame: At the extubation time
At the extubation time
Number of patients with invasive or non-invasive mechanical ventilation
Time Frame: 48 hours after the extubation
Resort to invasive or non-invasive mechanical ventilation
48 hours after the extubation
Mortality
Time Frame: At discharge of reanimation unit (up to 1 year)
At discharge of reanimation unit (up to 1 year)
Comparison between the predictive value of diaphragmatic ultrasound dysfunction and a clinical parameter : cough strength measured with a defined scale
Time Frame: At the extubation time

The scale used to measure the cough is the following :

  • absent
  • inefficient
  • low efficiency
  • mild efficiency
  • efficient
At the extubation time
Comparison between the predictive value of diaphragmatic ultrasound dysfunction and a clinical parameter : quantity of secretions measured with a defined scale
Time Frame: At the extubation time
  • any secretions
  • low secretions
  • mild secretions
  • abundant secretions
  • very abundant secretions
At the extubation time
Comparison between the predictive value of diaphragmatic ultrasound dysfunction and a clinical parameter : presence/absence or cervical tonus
Time Frame: At the extubation time
At the extubation time
Comparison between the predictive value of diaphragmatic ultrasound dysfunction and a clinical parameter : F/Vt ratio measured in breaths/min/L
Time Frame: At the extubation time
At the extubation time
Comparison between the predictive value of diaphragmatic ultrasound dysfunction and a paraclinical parameter : maximal inspiratory pressure in centimeters of water
Time Frame: At the extubation time
At the extubation time
Comparison between the predictive value of diaphragmatic ultrasound dysfunction and a paraclinical parameter : minimal expiratory pressure measured in centimeters of water
Time Frame: At the extubation time
At the extubation time
Comparison between the predictive value of diaphragmatic ultrasound dysfunction and a paraclinical parameter : peak flow measured in L/min (liters per minute)
Time Frame: At the extubation time
At the extubation time
Comparison between the predictive value of diaphragmatic ultrasound dysfunction and a paraclinical parameter : peak flow when coughing measured in L/min (liters per minute)
Time Frame: At the extubation time
At the extubation time
Comparison between the predictive value of diaphragmatic ultrasound dysfunction and a paraclinical parameter : P0,1 measured in milliseconds
Time Frame: At the extubation time
At the extubation time

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 6, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 28, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

November 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 27, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 25, 2016

First Posted (Estimated)

August 30, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 4, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 3, 2024

Last Verified

April 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Mechanical Ventilation Weaning

Clinical Trials on Diaphragmatic ultrasound

3
Subscribe