Reducing HIV Risk With High Risk HIV Negative Black MSM-Passport to Wellness (PtW)

Passport to Wellness-Full Intervention Phase

The proposed research study will focus on Black men who have sex with men (BMSM) who

  • are HIV- or unknown status AND
  • have not received HIV testing in over a year or
  • who test irregularly (on 9/21/2016, the protocol was changed to modify the last to criteria and focus on those who have not used PrEP in the prior six months).

and implement an innovative, culturally-informed, peer-based, and client-centered approach that is designed to increase their awareness of their HIV status and their timely entry into prevention (including PrEP), testing, care, and treatment services. The research design compares the effect of an incentives-only approach to one that uses incentives, along with the involvement of peer mentors to support timely entry into prevention, testing, care and treatment. This phase of the study is designed to assess peer-supported intervention group versus a passport/incentive-only control group over an 18-month period using a randomized trial approach.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The proposed research study focuses on BMSM who have not received HIV testing in over a year, or who test irregularly, and implement an innovative, culturally-informed, peer-based, and client-centered approach that is designed to increase their awareness of their HIV status and their timely entry into prevention, care, and treatment services. On 9/21/2016, the protocol was changed to focus on those who have not used PrEP in the prior six months.

The research design compares the effect of an incentives-only approach to one that uses incentives, along with the involvement of peer mentors to support timely entry into prevention, testing, care and treatment. This phase of the study is designed to assess peer-supported intervention group versus a passport/incentive-only control group over an 18-month period using a randomized trial approach.

The Specific Aims of the full intervention phase are:

2 (Modified). To assess the effectiveness of a peer-supported, incentivized, and client-centered approach (PtW) compared to a non-peer supported, incentivized, and client-centered approach (Control) for linking at-risk BMSM to biomedical (PEP, STD testing), structural or behavioral services that support HIV prevention and care.

2a. Hypothesis: the peer-supported model (PtW) will lead to more frequent and earlier linkages to services than the non-peer supported model (Control).

2b. Hypothesis: the peer-supported model (PtW) will lead to greater reductions in HIV risk behaviors than the non-peer-supported model (Control).

3 (NEW). To assess the effectiveness of a peer-supported, incentivized, and client-centered approach (PtW) compared to a non-peer supported, incentivized, and client-centered approach (Control) for linking at-risk BMSM to PrEP services.

3a. Hypothesis: the peer-supported model (PtW) will lead to more frequent receipt of PrEP education and consultations than the non-peer-supported model (Control) 3b. Hypothesis: the peer-supported model (PtW) will lead to more frequent uptake of PrEP (defined as taking PrEP at six month follow-up) than the non-peer-supported model (Control).

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

105

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • California
      • Los Angeles, California, United States, 90059
        • Charles Drew University of Medicine and Science
      • Los Angeles, California, United States, 90013
        • Los Angeles Centers for Alcohol and Drug Abuse (LA CADA)

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

Male

Description

Inclusion criteria:

  1. self identify as male
  2. self-identify as Black or African American
  3. sex with a male or male-to-female transgender in the last 6 months
  4. intercourse without a condom in the last 6 months
  5. Los Angeles County resident,
  6. either is unaware of HIV status and has not tested for HIV in the last 12 months or has recently tested (within 30 days), but had not received testing in the prior 12 months

    • 6) Modified 9/21/2016 to has not taken PrEP in the prior 6 months

Exclusion criteria:

  1. self-identify as female or transgender male or female
  2. does not self-identify as Black or African American
  3. no sex with a man or a male-to-female transgender in the last 6 months
  4. no sexual intercourse in the last 6 months
  5. resides outside of Los Angeles County
  6. is HIV-positive OR has tested between 1 and 13 months prior to enrollment.

    • 6) Modified 9/21/2016 to has not taken PrEP in the prior 6 months

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: PREVENTION
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Control-Passport Only
Complete a needs assessment and develop a written "Passport to Wellness," an itemized set of health promoting behaviors and services aligned with lifestyle and goals. Participants are compensated based on the items they complete, services they attend.

A trained staff member will use a needs assessment and the participant's own priorities to develop a 'Passport to Wellness,' a personalized set of services whose access may encourage HIV prevention or address barriers to HIV testing.

Example passport items include: getting an HIV test, attending an informational session about PEP/PrEP, meeting with a PrEP provider, attending 12-step meetings, yoga classes, a massage or Reiki session, or reviewing specific HIV prevention information online. Participants will be incentivized for each passport item they complete.

Other Names:
  • Control
Experimental: Intervention-Passport and Peer Mentor
In addition to the "Passport to Wellness" developed with project staff, study participants will select a peer mentor trained in motivational interviewing. The peer mentor will help guide the participant to complete passport items. Part of passport development will include compensation for meeting with peer mentors to form strategies for meeting goals and addressing barriers/challenges that arise.

A trained staff member will use a needs assessment and the participant's own priorities to develop a 'Passport to Wellness,' a personalized set of services whose access may encourage HIV prevention or address barriers to HIV testing.

Example passport items include: getting an HIV test, attending an informational session about PEP/PrEP, meeting with a PrEP provider, attending 12-step meetings, yoga classes, a massage or Reiki session, or reviewing specific HIV prevention information online. Participants will be incentivized for each passport item they complete.

Other Names:
  • Control
In addition to the passport and incentives described below for the control condition, participants assigned to the intervention will select a peer mentor trained in motivational interviewing. The mentor will help guide the participant to complete passport items and address priorities. Participants will also be incentivized for regular meetings with his peer mentor.
Other Names:
  • Passport To Wellness

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number self-reporting specific HIV/STD (sexually transmitted disease) Testing outcomes
Time Frame: 6 Months
--Number of participants 1) human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) tested within one and six months of their baseline; 2) newly diagnosed with HIV, and 3) obtaining testing for other STDs within six months of their baseline.
6 Months
Number with specific PrEP outcomes
Time Frame: 6 Months
--Number of participants who attend a PrEP information session, meet with a PrEP provider, or obtain a new PrEP prescription.
6 Months
Number self-reporting specific Social and Behavioral Outcomes
Time Frame: 6 Months
--Number of participants who obtain social and behavioral services that support HIV prevention and care.
6 Months
Percentage self-reporting specific HIV/STD (sexually transmitted disease) Testing outcomes
Time Frame: 6 Months
--Percentage of participants 1) human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) tested within one and six months of their baseline; 2) newly diagnosed with HIV, and 3) obtaining testing for other STDs within six months of their baseline. Summary data may include the percentage who report HIV or STD testing.
6 Months
Percentage with specific PrEP outcomes
Time Frame: 6 Months
--Percentage of participants who attend a PrEP information session, meet with a PrEP provider, or obtain a new PrEP prescription. Summary items may include the percentage who report doing any of these three PrEP activities.
6 Months
Percentage of self-reporting specific Social and Behavioral Outcomes
Time Frame: 6 Months
--Percentage of participants who obtain social and behavioral services that support HIV prevention and care.
6 Months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of referrals HIV tested
Time Frame: 6 Months
The investigators will compare between the two arms, the number of HIV tested referrals from study participants in each arm who were 1) BMSM, 2) BMSM newly diagnosed with HIV, and 3) people from other race/gender/sexual orientation groups
6 Months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Nina T. Harawa, PhD; MPH, UCLA; Charles R. Drew University of Science
  • Principal Investigator: Charles McWells, Los Angeles Centers for Alcohol and Drug Addiction (LA CADA)

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 1, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

April 1, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 30, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 11, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

October 13, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 2, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 1, 2018

Last Verified

August 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • TL13-LACA-576

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on HIV

Clinical Trials on Control-Passport Only

3
Subscribe