Pre-procedure Planning for Liver Biopsy or Radiofrequency Ablation Using CT or MR/US Fusing Imaging

November 16, 2016 updated by: Seoul National University Hospital

Pre-procedure Planning for Liver Biopsy or Radiofrequency Ablation Using the Automatic Fusion Images of the Registrated 3D CT or MR-US Scans

The purpose of this study is to determine whether fusion technique of preradiofrequency ablation (RFA) or percutaneous liver biopsy cross-sectional imaging (CT or MR) and real-time ultrasonography would improve feasibility of RFA or liver biopsy in patients with liver tumor in comparison with ultrasonography guidance alone. And assessment of a new point shear-wave elastography method (pSWE, S-shear wave) and compare its accuracy in assessing liver stiffness (LS) with another pSWE technique (ARFI).

Study Overview

Detailed Description

RFA is one of commonly used local therapies for primary or secondary liver tumors. And percutaneous liver biopsy is very important technique to confirm the diagnosis of focal hepatic lesion whether benign or malignancy.

For successful and safe procedure, safe access route and lesion visibility are essential , and the conditions are usually evaluated on pre-procedure planning ultrasonography (USG). However, these procedure is sometimes aborted due to limited sonic window of various cause and challenging identification of small isoechoic tumors or hepatocellular carcinomas among dysplastic nodules . Therefore, precise targeting and assuring safe route would be of clinical importance. In this preliminary study, investigators attempted to determine US and CT/MR fusion technique would be able to improve RFA or liver biopsy feasibility in patients with liver tumors in comparison with conventional US alone technique.

In addition, to assess intra- and inter-observer reproducibility of a new point shear-wave elastography method (pSWE, S-shear wave) and compare its accuracy in assessing liver stiffness (LS) with another pSWE technique (ARFI).

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

185

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

20 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • all conditions should be satisfied for inclusion.

    • referred to Radiology in our institution for liver tumor RFA or percutaneous liver biopsy
    • available pre-procedure liver CT or liver MR imaging within 6 weeks

Exclusion Criteria:

  • any contraindication of liver RFA or percutaneous liver biopsy • any patients who received treatment between pre-RFA imaging and planned RFA.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: NA
  • Interventional Model: SINGLE_GROUP
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: CT/US fusion
patients undergo routine conventional feasibility planning ultrasound, and clinical decision of percutaneous liver biopsy or RFA feasibility is made based on conventional planning ultrasound. Then additional planning ultrasound using CT/US fusion technique is immediately performed by the same operator, and clinical decision is made based on fusion imaging.
Fusion of pre-procedure cross-sectional imaging (CT or MRI) and real-time USG using registration function of USG device.
ultrasound shear wave elastography is performed in S-shear wave scanner according to guidelines of ultrasound elastography.
Other Names:
  • S-shear wave

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
RFA or biopsy feasibility rates on planning USG with/without fusion CT/MR and US
Time Frame: 10 minutes after finishing planning USG
comparison of rates of RFA feasibility on conventional planning USG and on fusion planning USG
10 minutes after finishing planning USG
Assessment of a new point shear-wave elastography method (pSWE, S-shear wave)
Time Frame: 10 minutes after finishing planning USG
To assess intra- and inter-observer reproducibility of a new point shear-wave elastography method (pSWE, S-shear wave) and compare its accuracy in assessing liver stiffness (LS) with another pSWE technique (ARFI).
10 minutes after finishing planning USG

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Rate of tumor visibility on planning USG with/without fusion technique
Time Frame: 10 minutes after finishing planning USG
comparison of tumor visibility (or detection) rates on planning USG on conventional planning USG and fusion planning USG
10 minutes after finishing planning USG
Number of patients with safety access route on planning USG with/without fusion technique
Time Frame: 10 minutes after finishing planning USG
comparison of number of patients with presence/absence of safety access route, and the on two planning USGs
10 minutes after finishing planning USG

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

November 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 1, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

November 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 16, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 16, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

November 18, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

November 18, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 16, 2016

Last Verified

November 1, 2016

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Liver Fibroses

Clinical Trials on CT/US fusion

3
Subscribe