The Multicenter Randomized HYpertension and VALUEs (HYVALUE) Trial (HYVALUE)

November 15, 2022 updated by: University of Colorado, Denver

Using Values Affirmation to Reduce the Effects of Stereotype Threat on Hypertension Disparities: The Multicenter Randomized HYpertension and VALUEs (HYVALUE) Trial

The objective of this study is to reduce the effects of stereotype threat on the adherence of African American patients with hypertension.

The specific aims of this study, which employs a values affirmation intervention, are to:

  1. Compare the effects of the values-affirmation exercise to a control condition on antihypertensive medication adherence in African American patients with uncontrolled hypertension across three clinical settings,
  2. Compare the effects of the values-affirmation exercise on antihypertensive medication adherence in African American patients and white patients with uncontrolled hypertension and similar socioeconomic characteristics, and
  3. Evaluate the intervention for widespread dissemination using the RE-AIM (reach, effectiveness, adoption, implementation and maintenance) framework

Study Overview

Detailed Description

One in 3 US adults has hypertension and African Americans are disproportionately affected; almost 40% of non-Hispanic blacks have hypertension. Although the rates of uncontrolled hypertension have been decreasing in all groups, African Americans continue to have higher rates of uncontrolled hypertension compared to white Americans. The Institute of Medicine, World Health Organization and others have identified poor adherence to medications as the most significant, modifiable contributor to uncontrolled hypertension.

Stereotype threat may contribute to low adherence. Stereotype threat occurs when cues in the environment (such as visiting a doctor's office) trigger the threat of confirming, as self-characteristic, a negative stereotype about one's group. Although any individual may experience stereotype threat, African Americans are at greater risk due to widespread racism and past experiences of discrimination.

Values affirmation interventions reduce stereotype threat and decrease racial disparities in various outcomes. Values affirmation exercises typically ask participants to write a few sentences about their core values. By focusing on values that are important to them, values affirmation bolsters a person's self-concept by helping them view themselves as adequate, effective, and able to control important outcomes in spite of a possible threat.

Based on the evidence supporting the effectiveness of values affirmation in educational and other settings, the investigators hypothesize that values affirmation can similarly reduce racial disparities in medication adherence and subsequent health outcomes. By asking participating intervention patients to engage in a values affirmation exercise at an initial appointment with a primary care provider, the investigators hope to improve hypertensive medication adherence, systolic blood pressure, time under blood pressure control, and treatment intensification, and to reduce racial disparities in these outcomes.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

960

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Colorado
      • Denver, Colorado, United States, 80204
        • Denver Health and Hospital Authority
      • Denver, Colorado, United States, 80205
        • Kaiser Permanente of Colorado
    • Maryland
      • Rockville, Maryland, United States, 20852
        • Kaiser Permanente Mid Atlantic States

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

21 years to 100 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Hypertension diagnosis: primary or secondary ICD-10 code diagnosis in last 24 mo
  • SBP >140 mm Hg or DBP >90 mm Hg in last 12 months
  • Currently taking antihypertensive medications
  • Medications filled within health system's pharmacy
  • White or African American, self-reported race
  • Upcoming primary care visit
  • Ability to read and write English

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnancy-related hypertension
  • Dialysis-dependent end-stage renal disease
  • Prisoners
  • Unable to provide consent

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Intervention Values Affirmation
The task first asks patients to reflect on a list of 11 personal values or self-defining skills.
Participants are asked to circle the two or three values that are MOST important to them. Next, participants are asked to think about times when the values chosen might be important to THEMSELVES and then write a few sentences to describe when and why they might be important.
Active Comparator: Control Values Affirmation
The task first asks patients to reflect on a list of 11 personal values or self-defining skills.
Participants are asked to circle the two or three items that are LEAST important to them. Next, participants are asked to think about times when the values chosen might be important to SOMEONE ELSE and then write a few sentences to describe when and why they might be important.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Antihypertensive Medication Adherence using Pharmacy Records
Time Frame: Baseline, 3 and 6 months
This antihypertensive medication adherence outcome will be a summary measure of adherence which assesses the proportion of days covered (PDC) over the period of observation for which a patient obtains antihypertensive medications. Adherence will be calculated for each antihypertensive drug in the regimen and combined across drugs into a summary measure of adherence for the entire drug regimen.
Baseline, 3 and 6 months
Change in Antihypertensive Medication Adherence using Self-Reported Adherence
Time Frame: Baseline, 3 and 6 months
This antihypertensive medication adherence outcome will be a summary measure of self-reported adherence using the validated Voils instrument, which has 3 questions that address adherence over the previous 7 days.
Baseline, 3 and 6 months
Change in Antihypertensive Medication Adherence using Pill Counts
Time Frame: Baseline, 3 and 6 months
This antihypertensive medication adherence outcome will be a summary outcome measure of adherence where if x is the number of pills in the bottle, y is the number of pills that would have been in the bottle had all pills been taken since the bottle was filled, and z is the number of pills that should have been taken since the last fill, and adherence is calculated as 1- [(x-y)/z].
Baseline, 3 and 6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Systolic Blood Pressure
Time Frame: Baseline, 3 and 6 months
Systolic blood pressure over time
Baseline, 3 and 6 months
Proportion of Time Blood Pressure is Under Control
Time Frame: 6 months
Defined as the proportion of time over the 6-months of follow-up with a BP ≤ 140/90 mmHg.
6 months
Average Treatment Intensification
Time Frame: 6 months
Calculated by subtracting the number of expected intensifications (number of visits after enrollment with a BP ≥140/90 mm Hg) from the number of observed intensifications (either an increase in dose or addition of a new medication class), and then dividing this difference by the number of office visits over the observation period.
6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Stacie L Daugherty, MD, MSPH, University of Colorado, Denver

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 1, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 17, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 19, 2017

First Posted (Estimate)

January 23, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 27, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 15, 2022

Last Verified

November 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 16-0510
  • 1R01HL133343-01 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

IPD Plan Description

No plan to share IPD at this time.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Hypertension

Clinical Trials on Intervention Values Affirmation

3
Subscribe