- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT03049878
Efficacy of Preoperative Administration of Paracetamol-codeine on Pain Following Impacted Mandibular Third Molar Surgery
Efficacy of Preoperative Administration of Paracetamol-codeine on Pain Following Impacted Mandibular Third Molar Surgery: a Randomized, Split-mouth, Placebo-controller, Double-blind Clinical Trial
Objectives:
The aim of this study was to determine the effectiveness of preoperative administration of single-dose of paracetamol-codeine, in the relieving of acute post-operative pain after the surgical removal of an impacted mandibular third molar.
Materials and Methods:
The study cohort consisted of 32 Caucasian outpatients, giving a total of 64 bilateral symmetrical impacted mandibles. Patients were randomized in two experimental groups to receive a preoperative oral dose of paracetamol-codeine (analgesic group) or a placebo (placebo group) at the first and second surgeries. Study participants were asked to record pain intensity scores during the operation and the next 2 days, the time of the first request for rescue analgesic, and the total number of postoperative-supplement paracetamol-codeine tablets.
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Phase 4
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- absence of systemic pathologies (ASA class I);
- non-smoker;
- not pregnant or lactating;
- good oral hygiene;
- no drug consumption for 10 days before the operation;
- bilateral impacted mandibular third molars with comparable position, depth and inclination;
- presence of the first and second molars;
- absence of painful symptoms and associated inflammatory or osteolytic pathologies in a radiographic examination;
- extraction difficulty index of >7 according to Pederson's scale and a degree of IV (complex procedures) on a modified version of Parant's scale.
Exclusion Criteria:
-
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Triple
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Active Comparator: analgesic group
preoperative oral dose of paracetamol-codeine
|
preoperative administration
|
Placebo Comparator: placebo group
preoperative placebo (starch)
|
preoperative administration
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Pain measurement assessed with the Numerical Rating Scale-11 (NRS-11) during the operative day.
Time Frame: All study participants were asked to record the pain intensity score at 1:00 pm during the operative day
|
The primary outcome of the study was the post-operative pain.
Before surgery, patients were instructed to complete the Numerical Rating Scale-11 (NRS-11), which consisted of an interval scale ranging from 0 ("no pain") to 10 ("maximum pain")
|
All study participants were asked to record the pain intensity score at 1:00 pm during the operative day
|
Pain measurement assessed with the Numerical Rating Scale-11 (NRS-11) during the operative day.
Time Frame: All study participants were asked to record the pain intensity score at 6:00 pm during the operative day
|
The primary outcome of the study was the post-operative pain.
Before surgery, patients were instructed to complete the Numerical Rating Scale-11 (NRS-11), which consisted of an interval scale ranging from 0 ("no pain") to 10 ("maximum pain")
|
All study participants were asked to record the pain intensity score at 6:00 pm during the operative day
|
Pain measurement assessed with the Numerical Rating Scale-11 (NRS-11) during the operative day.
Time Frame: All study participants were asked to record the pain intensity score at 11:00 pm during the operative day
|
The primary outcome of the study was the post-operative pain.
Before surgery, patients were instructed to complete the Numerical Rating Scale-11 (NRS-11), which consisted of an interval scale ranging from 0 ("no pain") to 10 ("maximum pain")
|
All study participants were asked to record the pain intensity score at 11:00 pm during the operative day
|
Pain measurement assessed with the Numerical Rating Scale-11 (NRS-11) during the 2th day after surgery.
Time Frame: All study participants were asked to record the pain intensity score at 8:00 am during the 2th day after surgery
|
The primary outcome of the study was the post-operative pain.
Before surgery, patients were instructed to complete the Numerical Rating Scale-11 (NRS-11), which consisted of an interval scale ranging from 0 ("no pain") to 10 ("maximum pain")
|
All study participants were asked to record the pain intensity score at 8:00 am during the 2th day after surgery
|
Pain measurement assessed with the Numerical Rating Scale-11 (NRS-11) during the 2th day after surgery.
Time Frame: All study participants were asked to record the pain intensity score at 1:00 pm during the 2th day after surgery
|
The primary outcome of the study was the post-operative pain.
Before surgery, patients were instructed to complete the Numerical Rating Scale-11 (NRS-11), which consisted of an interval scale ranging from 0 ("no pain") to 10 ("maximum pain")
|
All study participants were asked to record the pain intensity score at 1:00 pm during the 2th day after surgery
|
Pain measurement assessed with the Numerical Rating Scale-11 (NRS-11) during the 2th day after surgery.
Time Frame: All study participants were asked to record the pain intensity score at 6:00 pm during the 2th day after surgery
|
The primary outcome of the study was the post-operative pain.
Before surgery, patients were instructed to complete the Numerical Rating Scale-11 (NRS-11), which consisted of an interval scale ranging from 0 ("no pain") to 10 ("maximum pain")
|
All study participants were asked to record the pain intensity score at 6:00 pm during the 2th day after surgery
|
Pain measurement assessed with the Numerical Rating Scale-11 (NRS-11) during the 2th day after surgery.
Time Frame: All study participants were asked to record the pain intensity score at 11:00 pm during the 2th day after surgery
|
The primary outcome of the study was the post-operative pain.
Before surgery, patients were instructed to complete the Numerical Rating Scale-11 (NRS-11), which consisted of an interval scale ranging from 0 ("no pain") to 10 ("maximum pain")
|
All study participants were asked to record the pain intensity score at 11:00 pm during the 2th day after surgery
|
Pain measurement assessed with the Numerical Rating Scale-11 (NRS-11) during the 3th day after surgery.
Time Frame: All study participants were asked to record the pain intensity score at 8:00 am during the 3th day after surgery
|
The primary outcome of the study was the post-operative pain.
Before surgery, patients were instructed to complete the Numerical Rating Scale-11 (NRS-11), which consisted of an interval scale ranging from 0 ("no pain") to 10 ("maximum pain")
|
All study participants were asked to record the pain intensity score at 8:00 am during the 3th day after surgery
|
Pain measurement assessed with the Numerical Rating Scale-11 (NRS-11) during the 3th day after surgery.
Time Frame: All study participants were asked to record the pain intensity score at 1:00 pm during the 3th day after surgery
|
The primary outcome of the study was the post-operative pain.
Before surgery, patients were instructed to complete the Numerical Rating Scale-11 (NRS-11), which consisted of an interval scale ranging from 0 ("no pain") to 10 ("maximum pain")
|
All study participants were asked to record the pain intensity score at 1:00 pm during the 3th day after surgery
|
Pain measurement assessed with the Numerical Rating Scale-11 (NRS-11) during the 3th day after surgery.
Time Frame: All study participants were asked to record the pain intensity score at 6:00 pm during the 3th day after surgery
|
The primary outcome of the study was the post-operative pain.
Before surgery, patients were instructed to complete the Numerical Rating Scale-11 (NRS-11), which consisted of an interval scale ranging from 0 ("no pain") to 10 ("maximum pain")
|
All study participants were asked to record the pain intensity score at 6:00 pm during the 3th day after surgery
|
Pain measurement assessed with the Numerical Rating Scale-11 (NRS-11) during the 3th day after surgery.
Time Frame: All study participants were asked to record the pain intensity score at 11:00 pm during the 3th day after surgery
|
The primary outcome of the study was the post-operative pain.
Before surgery, patients were instructed to complete the Numerical Rating Scale-11 (NRS-11), which consisted of an interval scale ranging from 0 ("no pain") to 10 ("maximum pain")
|
All study participants were asked to record the pain intensity score at 11:00 pm during the 3th day after surgery
|
Other Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Number of patients using rescue therapy
Time Frame: Number of patients using rescue therapy on the same day from the end of the surgery and during 2 days after operative days
|
Number of patients using rescue therapy during 3 days after surgery
|
Number of patients using rescue therapy on the same day from the end of the surgery and during 2 days after operative days
|
Time of analgesic medication
Time Frame: Time elapsed from the end of surgery until the first intake of analgesic medication on the same day of the surgery
|
Time elapsed from the end of surgery until the first intake of analgesic medication (minutes)
|
Time elapsed from the end of surgery until the first intake of analgesic medication on the same day of the surgery
|
Number of paracetamol-codeine tablets
Time Frame: Number of paracetamol-codeine tablets taken by the patients during the 3 days after surgery
|
Total number of paracetamol-codeine tablets with the same formulation taken by the patient in relation to the pain symptoms
|
Number of paracetamol-codeine tablets taken by the patients during the 3 days after surgery
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Maria Paola Cristalli, DDS, University of Roma La Sapienza
Publications and helpful links
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
- Stomatognathic Diseases
- Tooth Diseases
- Tooth, Impacted
- Physiological Effects of Drugs
- Central Nervous System Depressants
- Peripheral Nervous System Agents
- Analgesics
- Sensory System Agents
- Analgesics, Non-Narcotic
- Antipyretics
- Analgesics, Opioid
- Narcotics
- Respiratory System Agents
- Antitussive Agents
- Acetaminophen
- Codeine
Other Study ID Numbers
- 2704/21.02.2013
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on To Control Pain After Third Molar Surgery
-
University of Roma La SapienzaCompletedComparative Analgesic Effects of Paracetamol/Codeine and Ibuprofen on Pain After Third Molar SurgeryTo Control Pain After Third Molar SurgeryItaly
-
Washington University School of MedicineEnrolling by invitationSystemic Lidocaine Improves Pain Control After Surgery by Attenuating the Systemic Inflammatory Response to SurgeryUnited States
-
Implantology InstituteRecruitingQuality of Life | Pain, Postoperative | Molar, Third | Third Molar Surgery | Soft Tissue SwellingPortugal
-
University of Padova, School of Dental MedicineCompletedPain | Oral Surgery | Third Molar ExtractionItaly
-
University of CataniaCompletedImpacted Third Molar Tooth | Third Molar SurgeryItaly
-
AB Biotics, SAHospital de Nens de BarcelonaCompletedSurgery--Complications | Molar, ThirdSpain
-
Purdue Pharma LPTerminatedPostsurgical Pain Due to Third Molar ExtractionUnited States
-
University of Padova, School of Dental MedicineCompletedPain | Oral Surgery | Third Molar Extraction
-
University of Sao PauloCompleted
-
Medical University of GrazCompletedThird Molar Extraction SurgeryAustria
Clinical Trials on Paracetamol Codeine
-
University of ZimbabweUZ-CHS-PERFECTSuspendedImpacted Third Molar Tooth | PAINZimbabwe
-
University of MonastirCompletedAcute Pain Due to TraumaTunisia
-
Aziende Chimiche Riunite Angelini Francesco S.p.ACross Research S.A.Completed
-
Reckitt Benckiser LLCPremier Research Group plc; Aptuit Inc.CompletedPost-operative PainUnited States
-
Ullevaal University HospitalUniversity of OsloCompletedPain, PostoperativeNorway
-
Genzyme, a Sanofi CompanyCompleted
-
Ullevaal University HospitalUniversity of OsloCompleted
-
Centre Oscar LambretSantelys AssociationUnknownUterine Cervical Cancer | Upper Aerodigestive Tract NeoplasmsFrance
-
IRCCS Policlinico S. MatteoWithdrawn
-
Napp Pharmaceuticals LimitedCompleted