Hemodialysis in the Elderly (70yrs & Older) (ELDERLY)

August 9, 2023 updated by: E. Peden, MD

A Randomized Controlled Comparative Study on Efficacy and Cost-effectiveness of Autologous Arteriovenous Fistulas Versus Hemodialysis Access Grafts in Elderly Patients

This will be a prospective, single institution, parallel-group, single-blinded, randomized-controlled, two-arm, effectiveness study comparing autologous arteriovenous fistula versus hemodialysis access grafts in the elderly. The target sample size will include enrollment of 270 patients over a period of 5 years. The creation of an autologous arteriovenous fistula or placement of a hemodialysis access graft constitutes the two arms of the study.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This will be a prospective, single institution, parallel-group, single-blinded, randomized-controlled, two-arm, effectiveness study comparing autologous arteriovenous fistula versus hemodialysis access grafts in the elderly. The target sample size will include enrollment of 270 patients over a period of 5 years. The creation of an autologous arteriovenous fistula or placement of a hemodialysis access graft constitutes the two arms of the study.

Following the access creation the patients will be followed-up as per the standard and study protocol for a period of 2 years from the time of access creation.

The investigators will use block randomization to achieve a patient allocation ratio of 1:1, using varying blocks of sizes 4 and 6 in a random order as per a web-based/computer generated system maintained as a block randomization sequence/list concealed from the blinded clinical and trial research team until the end of trial. Patients will be randomly allocated based on this permuted sequence to either of the two intervention groups.

Masking will be performed and shall involve blinding of the patients participating in the trial. The research assistants involved with consenting, enrolling, data collection and follow-up, and the statistician analyzing the outcome measures will be blinded to the group assignment. The operating surgeon shall be blinded to the allocation process until the time of access creation following which the knowledge regarding the type of access creation by the surgeon is inevitable. All patients will be consented and their study related details including history, physical evaluations, diagnostic tests, etc., will be entered on a case report form and maintained on a web-based database. The patients will be followed-up for a period of 2 years from the time of initial access creation until the access is abandoned or rendered nonfunctional until the end of the study period.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

270

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Texas
      • Houston, Texas, United States, 77030
        • Recruiting
        • Houston Methodist Hospital
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Carlos Bechara, MD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Linda Le, MD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Thomas Loh, MD
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Eric Peden, MD
        • Contact:
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

70 years and older (Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Aged ≥70 years of all ethnicities, and;
  • Have vascular anatomy amenable to arteriovenous fistula creation, and;
  • Diagnosed with End-stage Renal Disease stage 4 (GFR 15-29 ml/min 1.73m2) or stage 5 (GFR <15ml/min 1.73m2) as per the National Kidney Foundation guidelines needing vascular access for hemodialysis; or,
  • Currently undergoing hemodialysis with a failure of previous access; or,
  • Expected to undergo hemodialysis within 6 months of presentation.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Unable or refuse to abide with follow-up; or,
  • Known hypercoagulability syndrome or a bleeding disorder; or,
  • Intraoperative decision was made in favor of fistula instead of graft; or,
  • Active infections; or,
  • Evidence or suspicion of central vein stenosis but shall be included if a central vein catheter or pacemaker is implanted as long as the patient had a venogram within past 6 months.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Surgical fistula creation from patient's anatomy
Patients randomized to surgical arteriovenous fistula will have a fistula surgically created from their anatomy to be used for hemodialysis access.
Patient will be randomized via computer system, to receive the fistula or graft. If fistula, surgeon creates fistula for hemodialysis access from patient's anatomy.
Other Names:
  • Fistula
Active Comparator: Surgical graft implant
Patients randomized to surgical graft, will have a commercially available graft surgically implanted to be used for hemodialysis access.
Patient will be randomized via computer system, to receive the fistula or graft. If fistula, surgeon creates fistula for hemodialysis access from patient's anatomy.
Other Names:
  • Fistula
Patient will be randomized via computer system, to receive the fistula or graft. If graft, surgeon implants hemodialysis access using an FDA approved graft.
Other Names:
  • FDA approved graft (various manufacturers)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Analyze hemodialysis (HD) access creation, arteriovenous (AV) fistula vs Graft, in elderly patients.
Time Frame: 12 months
Assess frequency of HD access use, abandonment, and patency at 12 months post-procedure. We will communicate with the patient every month from date of surgery until 12 months to complete questionnaires to determine access use and patency for their study related access creation
12 months
Functional cumulative patency rate at 12 months
Time Frame: 12 months
Functional refers to the availability of the access for hemofiltration. Primary patency refers to the successful use of a vascular access for hemodialysis without any surgical or endovascular intervention
12 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Using Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative quality of life tool to evaluate and compare the overall improvement in outcome with respect to morbidity in the 2 years post fistula/graft procedure
Time Frame: 2 years
Using Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative quality of life tool
2 years
To compare and analyze the estimated costs with both types of hemodialysis interventions and their postoperative outcomes.
Time Frame: 2 years
Analysis of hospital bills to compare the costs with both types of hemodialysis interventions
2 years
Using Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative quality of life tool to evaluate and compare the overall improvement in outcome with respect to mortality in the 2 years post fistula/graft procedure
Time Frame: 2 years
Using Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative quality of life tool
2 years
Using Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative quality of life tool to evaluate and compare the overall improvement in outcome with respect to patient's quality of life in the 2 years post fistula/graft procedure
Time Frame: 2 years
Using Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative quality of life tool
2 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Eric K Peden, MD, The Methodist Hospital Research Institute

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 28, 2016

Primary Completion (Estimated)

February 1, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

February 1, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 15, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 22, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

February 28, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 14, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 9, 2023

Last Verified

August 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

The Investigators plan to write a manuscript once all the participant information has been compiled.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Available for 5 years upon study completion

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

After publication of results, de-identified participant data can be made available upon reasonable request to the Primary Investigator

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP
  • CSR

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Chronic Kidney Disease

Clinical Trials on Surgical fistula creation from patient's anatomy

3
Subscribe