Corticosteroid Injection in Carpal Tunnel Syndrome

Comparison of Different Dose of Steroid Injection in Carpal Tunnel Syndrome

To compare the effectiveness of different dose of ultrasound guided steroid injection in patient with carpal tunnel syndrome, by using clinical and electrophysiological parameters in evlauation

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This is a prospective, single-blinded randomized controlled study to determine the efficacy of low dose corticosteroid in patient with CTS. Patient with CTS were randomly assigned to group receiving ultrasound guided steroid injection with different dosage of triamcinolone acetonide (Shincort) mixed, 1ml 10mg (10mg/ml) or 1ml 40mg (40mg/ml) with 1 ml of 2% lidocaine hydrochloride. The follow up at 6 and 12 weeks includes Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire, nerve conductive study and VAS pain score.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

56

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Taipei, Taiwan
        • Taipei Veteran General Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Clinical diagnosis of CTS
  • The diagnosis of CTS was confirmed by electrophysiological tests.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • presence of thenar atrophy
  • existence of disorders such as hypothyroidism, diabetes mellitus, chronic renal failure, or rheumatoid arthritis; any accompanying orthopedic or neurologic disorders that could mimic CTS such as cervical radiculopathy, polyneuropathy, proximal median nerve entrapment, or thoracic outlet syndrome
  • prior steroid injection into the affected carpal tunnel within 6 months or ever received carpal tunnel surgery
  • history of distal radius fracture
  • pregnancy or lactation
  • regular use of systemic NSAIDs ,corticosteroids or diuretics
  • known allergy to corticosteroids and local anesthetics.
  • impaired cognitive function

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: low dose steroid
ultrasound-guided steroid injection using 1ml of 10 mg (10mg/ml) triamcinolone acetonide (Shincort) mixed with 1 ml of 2% lidocaine hydrochloride (Xylocaine)
ultrasound-guided injection using 1 ml of 2% lidocaine hydrochloride (Xylocaine)
Other Names:
  • lidocaine hydrochloride (Xylocaine)
ultrasound-guided injection using 1ml of 10 mg (10mg/ml) or 40 mg (40 mg/ml) triamcinolone acetonide (Shincort)
Other Names:
  • triamcinolone acetonide 10mg/ml (shincort, YSP, Taiwan)
Active Comparator: comparator
ultrasound-guided steroid injection using 1ml of 40 mg (40mg/ml) triamcinolone acetonide (Shincort) mixed with 1 ml of 2% lidocaine hydrochloride (Xylocaine)
ultrasound-guided injection using 1 ml of 2% lidocaine hydrochloride (Xylocaine)
Other Names:
  • lidocaine hydrochloride (Xylocaine)
ultrasound-guided injection using 1ml of 10 mg (10mg/ml) or 40 mg (40 mg/ml) triamcinolone acetonide (Shincort)
Other Names:
  • triamcinolone acetonide 10mg/ml (shincort, YSP, Taiwan)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change from Baseline in the scores on the Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire (BQ).
Time Frame: at 6, 12 weeks
The BQ was interviewed-administered to assess the severity of symptoms and functional status.
at 6, 12 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change from Baseline in Median nerve distal motor latency
Time Frame: at 6, 12 weeks
the CMAPs were obtained via surface electrodes placed on the abductor pollicis brevis muscle. The active recording electrode was placed on the muscle belly, and the reference electrode was placed on the tendon insertion. The median nerve was stimulated 8 cm proximal to the active recording electrode. Distal motor latencies were measured from the onset of stimulus artifact to the onset of the CMAP
at 6, 12 weeks
Change from Baseline in sensory nerve conduction velocity
Time Frame: at 6, 12 weeks
SNAPs were obtained using an antidromic method and recorded by surface electrodes placed at the proximal and distal interphalangeal joints of the index finger for the median nerve and the same joints of the little finger for the ulnar nerve. The median nerves were stimulated at the wrist at a distance of 14 cm from the wrist to the active electrode. Distal sensory latencies were measured from the onset of the stimulus artifact to the onset of the SNAP. SNCV was calculated dividing the distance of 14 cm by the distal sensory latency.
at 6, 12 weeks
Change from Baseline in compound muscle action potential amplitude (CMAP)
Time Frame: at 6, 12 weeks
the CMAPs were obtained via surface electrodes placed on the abductor pollicis brevis muscle. The active recording electrode was placed on the muscle belly, and the reference electrode was placed on the tendon insertion. The median nerve was stimulated 8 cm proximal to the active recording electrode. The amplitude of CMAP were measured from baseline to negative peak.
at 6, 12 weeks
Change from Baseline in self-reported pain intensity
Time Frame: at 6, 12 weeks
Patients were asked to indicate the intensity of their average level of pain for the wrist-hand region within the past 1 week, using an 11-point scale, ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain imaginable).
at 6, 12 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 18, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 28, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

December 20, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 1, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 1, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

March 7, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 30, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 28, 2019

Last Verified

July 1, 2019

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Carpal Tunnel Syndrome

Clinical Trials on lidocaine hydrochloride

3
Subscribe