- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT04625062
Comparing Traditional and Biofeedback Telepractice Treatment for Residual Speech Errors (C-RESULTS TPT)
January 26, 2023 updated by: New York University
Comparing Traditional and Biofeedback Treatment for Residual Speech Errors Via Telepractice
This study aims to evaluate the relative efficacy of biofeedback and traditional treatment for residual speech errors when both are delivered via telepractice.
In a single-case randomization design, up to eight children with RSE will receive both visual-acoustic biofeedback and traditional treatment via telepractice.
Acoustic measures of within-session change will be compared across sessions randomly assigned to each condition.
It is hypothesized that participants will exhibit a clinically significant overall treatment response and that short-term measures of change will indicate that biofeedback is associated with larger increments of progress than traditional treatment.
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
The COVID-19 crisis has forced speech-language pathologists to migrate from in-person delivery of speech treatment services to remote delivery via telepractice.
This study will compare the efficacy of visual-acoustic biofeedback treatment versus non-biofeedback treatment in this setting.
Specifically, participants will receive both visual-acoustic biofeedback treatment and non-biofeedback treatment via telepractice (Zoom call with screen-sharing) in a single-case randomization design.
The hypothesis of interest is that sessions featuring visual-acoustic biofeedback will be associated with larger short-term gains than sessions featuring non-biofeedback treatment.
To test this hypothesis, the study team will recruit up to 8 participants who will receive an initial treatment orientation followed by an equal dose of both types of treatment (10 sessions of visual-acoustic biofeedback and 10 sessions of non-biofeedback treatment).
Participants will complete approximately two sessions per week via telepractice; each week will feature one session of each type, randomly ordered.
They will also complete 4 pre-treatment baseline sessions and 3 post-treatment maintenance sessions to evaluate the overall magnitude of change over the course of treatment.
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
7
Phase
- Phase 1
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
New Jersey
-
Bloomfield, New Jersey, United States, 07003
- Montclair State University
-
-
New York
-
Syracuse, New York, United States, 13244
- Syracuse University
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
9 years to 15 years (CHILD)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Genders Eligible for Study
All
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Must be between 9;0 and 15;11 years of age at the time of enrollment.
- Must speak English as the dominant language (i.e., must have begun learning English by age 2, per parent report).
- Must speak a rhotic dialect of English.
- Must pass a brief examination of oral structure and function.
- Must exhibit less than thirty percent accuracy, based on trained listener ratings, on a probe list eliciting /r/ in various phonetic contexts at the word level.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Must not receive a T score more than 1.3 standard deviations (SD) below the mean on the Wechsler Abbreviated Scale of Intelligence-2 (WASI-2) Matrix Reasoning.
- Must not receive a scaled score below 6 on the CELF-5 Recalling Sentences or Formulated Sentences subtests.
- Must not have history of sensorineural hearing loss or failed infant hearing screening.
- Must not have an existing diagnosis of developmental disability, major neurobehavioral syndrome such as cerebral palsy, Down Syndrome, or Autism Spectrum Disorder, or major neural disorder (e.g., epilepsy, agenesis of the corpus callosum) or insult (e.g., traumatic brain injury, stroke, or tumor resection).
- Must not show clinically significant signs of apraxia of speech or dysarthria.
- Must not have major orthodontia that could interfere with tongue-palate contact.
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
- Allocation: RANDOMIZED
- Interventional Model: CROSSOVER
- Masking: SINGLE
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
EXPERIMENTAL: Visual-acoustic biofeedback
Visual- acoustic biofeedback treatment (behavioral) administered via telepractice
|
In visual-acoustic biofeedback treatment, participants view a dynamic display of the speech signal in the form of a real-time LPC (Linear Predictive Coding) spectrum.
Because correct vs incorrect productions of /r/ contrast acoustically in the frequency of the third formant (F3), participants were cued to make their real-time LPC spectrum match a visual target characterized by a low F3 frequency.
|
EXPERIMENTAL: Motor-based treatment
Motor-based articulation treatment administered via telepractice
|
Motor-based articulation treatment involves providing auditory models and verbal descriptions of correct articulator placement, then cueing repetitive motor practice.
Images and diagrams of the vocal tract were used as visual aids; however, no real-time visual display of articulatory or acoustic information will be made available.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Within-session Change in Percentage of "Correct" Ratings by Blinded Naive Listeners for /r/ Sounds Produced in Word Probes
Time Frame: Change in word probe accuracy was measured in each treatment session, which were administered over ten weeks.
|
To assess /r/ production accuracy, participants read probe lists eliciting 25 utterances of /r/ in various phonetic contexts at the start and end of each treatment session.
Recorded probe words are presented in randomized order for binary rating (correct/incorrect) by naive listeners who are blind to treatment condition and time point; the accuracy of each token is quantified as the percentage of "correct" ratings across 9 blinded listeners.
We then compute the mean percent correct ratings for each probe; the change in this value from pre to post session ("within-session change") is our outcome measure of interest.
Summary statistics report the mean and standard deviation of within-session change for each treatment condition, pooled across participants and sessions.
This Outcome Measure is assessed using a two-tailed paired-samples t-test comparing mean change in percent correct for each treatment condition across subjects.
Outcomes are evaluated relative to a superiority criterion.
|
Change in word probe accuracy was measured in each treatment session, which were administered over ten weeks.
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Publications and helpful links
The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.
General Publications
- Dugan SH, Silbert N, McAllister T, Preston JL, Sotto C, Boyce SE. Modelling category goodness judgments in children with residual sound errors. Clin Linguist Phon. 2019;33(4):295-315. doi: 10.1080/02699206.2018.1477834. Epub 2018 May 24.
- Campbell H, Harel D, Hitchcock E, McAllister Byun T. Selecting an acoustic correlate for automated measurement of American English rhotic production in children. Int J Speech Lang Pathol. 2018 Nov;20(6):635-643. doi: 10.1080/17549507.2017.1359334. Epub 2017 Aug 10.
- Campbell H, McAllister Byun T. Deriving individualised /r/ targets from the acoustics of children's non-rhotic vowels. Clin Linguist Phon. 2018;32(1):70-87. doi: 10.1080/02699206.2017.1330898. Epub 2017 Jul 13.
- McAllister Byun T. Efficacy of Visual-Acoustic Biofeedback Intervention for Residual Rhotic Errors: A Single-Subject Randomization Study. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2017 May 24;60(5):1175-1193. doi: 10.1044/2016_JSLHR-S-16-0038.
- McAllister Byun T, Tiede M. Perception-production relations in later development of American English rhotics. PLoS One. 2017 Feb 16;12(2):e0172022. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0172022. eCollection 2017.
- McAllister Byun T, Campbell H. Differential Effects of Visual-Acoustic Biofeedback Intervention for Residual Speech Errors. Front Hum Neurosci. 2016 Nov 11;10:567. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2016.00567. eCollection 2016.
- McAllister Byun T, Halpin PF, Szeredi D. Online crowdsourcing for efficient rating of speech: a validation study. J Commun Disord. 2015 Jan-Feb;53:70-83. doi: 10.1016/j.jcomdis.2014.11.003. Epub 2014 Dec 15.
- Harel D, Hitchcock ER, Szeredi D, Ortiz J, McAllister Byun T. Finding the experts in the crowd: Validity and reliability of crowdsourced measures of children's gradient speech contrasts. Clin Linguist Phon. 2017;31(1):104-117. doi: 10.3109/02699206.2016.1174306. Epub 2016 Jun 7.
- Hitchcock ER, Harel D, Byun TM. Social, Emotional, and Academic Impact of Residual Speech Errors in School-Aged Children: A Survey Study. Semin Speech Lang. 2015 Nov;36(4):283-94. doi: 10.1055/s-0035-1562911. Epub 2015 Oct 12.
- Byun TM, Hitchcock ER. Investigating the use of traditional and spectral biofeedback approaches to intervention for /r/ misarticulation. Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2012 Aug;21(3):207-21. doi: 10.1044/1058-0360(2012/11-0083). Epub 2012 Mar 21.
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (ACTUAL)
September 1, 2020
Primary Completion (ACTUAL)
March 18, 2021
Study Completion (ACTUAL)
March 18, 2021
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
September 8, 2020
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
November 5, 2020
First Posted (ACTUAL)
November 12, 2020
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)
February 13, 2023
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
January 26, 2023
Last Verified
November 1, 2020
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- C-RESULTS-TPT
- R01DC017476 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
NO
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Speech Sound Disorder
-
Yale UniversityCompleted
-
Universidade Federal de Santa MariaCompleted
-
New York UniversityNational Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (NIDCD); Syracuse... and other collaboratorsRecruitingSpeech Sound DisorderUnited States
-
McGill UniversityUnknownDyslexia | Developmental Articulation Disorder | Speech Articulation Disorder | Phonological ImpairmentCanada
-
Syracuse UniversityNational Institutes of Health (NIH); State University of New York - Upstate... and other collaboratorsRecruitingSpeech Sound DisorderUnited States
-
New York UniversityNational Institutes of Health (NIH); National Institute on Deafness and Other...CompletedSpeech Sound DisorderUnited States
-
Syracuse UniversityNational Institutes of Health (NIH); State University of New York - Upstate... and other collaboratorsRecruiting
-
Montclair State UniversityNew York University; National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication... and other collaboratorsRecruiting
-
University of Applied Sciences for Health Professions...Caritas Austria; Volkshilfe Upper AustriaRecruiting
-
New York UniversityNational Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (NIDCD); Syracuse... and other collaboratorsCompletedSpeech Sound DisorderUnited States
Clinical Trials on Visual-acoustic biofeedback
-
New York UniversityNational Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (NIDCD); Syracuse... and other collaboratorsCompletedSpeech Sound DisorderUnited States
-
New York UniversityNational Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (NIDCD); Syracuse... and other collaboratorsRecruitingSpeech Sound DisorderUnited States
-
Montclair State UniversityNew York University; National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication... and other collaboratorsRecruiting
-
New York UniversityNational Institutes of Health (NIH); National Institute on Deafness and Other...CompletedSpeech Sound DisorderUnited States
-
Assuta Ashdod HospitalCompleted
-
Riphah International UniversityRecruitingForward Head PosturePakistan
-
Rabin Medical CenterTel Aviv UniversityNot yet recruitingObstetric Labor Complications | Obstetric Trauma
-
Molloy CollegeWithdrawnHearing Impairment
-
Ziauddin UniversityRecruiting
-
University of British ColumbiaFortius Sport & HealthCompleted