Self-efficacy Enhancement and Exposure Therapy

April 10, 2018 updated by: Armin Zlomuzica, Ruhr University of Bochum

Enhancing Exposure: the Impact of Self-efficacy Enhancement on Treatment Outcome

Self-efficacy refers to the perceived belief to cope effectively, by personal efforts, with challenging situations and problems (Bandura, 1977). Basic research has shown that increases in perceived self-efficacy can enhance the extinction of fear (Zlomuzica et al., 2015). This study is aimed at translating these findings into a useful clinical application to augment exposure-based treatment outcome.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

In this study, the effects of self-efficacy enhancement on treatment outcome in patients with height phobia will be investigated.

Participants will be randomly assigned to one of the following conditions: i) virtual reality exposure + self-efficacy enhancement; ii) virtual reality exposure + control intervention; iii) virtual reality exposure only. The amount of exposure is identical across groups (i.e. maximum of 1 hour of exposure). The self-efficacy and the control intervention involve the retrieval of the exposure session with or without a focus on personal mastery experiences/achievements, respectively.

Treatment-induced changes as well as the effects of self-efficacy enhancement will be measured on the subjective level (i.e. in-vivo Behavioral Approach Tests, BATs; church tower), physiological level (heart rate during the BATs), and subjective level (subjective fear during the BATs as well as height-phobia related questionnaires) at each of the three assessments (i.e. pretreatment, after which the exposure will conducted on the same day, i.e. day 1; posttreatment, which is scheduled approximately 2-3 days after exposure, and follow-up assessment, which will take place 1-month after exposure).

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

71

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • North Rhine-Westphalia
      • Bochum, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany, 44787
        • Mental Health Research and Treatment Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years to 36 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • specific phobia (acrophobia)
  • normal or corrected vision

Exclusion Criteria:

  • somatic or neurological disease
  • personality disorder
  • bipolar disorder
  • acute drug- or alcoholabuse
  • pharmacological treatment within the past 4 weeks
  • mental retardation
  • any schizophrenic disease

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Exposure + self-efficacy enhancement
After the virtual exposure session, participants will receive instructions to recall the exposure session with a focus on the personal mastery experiences/achievements made during exposure.
specific instructions regarding the retrieval of mastery experiences during exposure will be given (e.g., pointing out discrepancies between expected negative consequences and actual outcome during exposure; focus on achievements)
Active Comparator: Exposure + control intervention
After the virtual exposure session, participants will receive instructions to recall the exposure session
specific instructions regarding the retrieval of the exposure session will be given without an emphasis on personal mastery experience (e.g., description of details regarding the virtual reality environment)
No Intervention: Exposure only
Treatment as usual: no intervention after the exposure session will be given.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in the Behavioral Approach Test (BAT)
Time Frame: from pretreatment through follow-up (i.e. baseline, approx. 2-3 days after treatment, 1 month after)
from pretreatment through follow-up (i.e. baseline, approx. 2-3 days after treatment, 1 month after)
Change in subjective fear during the BAT
Time Frame: from pretreatment through follow-up (i.e. baseline, approx. 2-3 days after, 1 month after)
Subjective fear during the BATs will be measured using the Subjective Units of Distress Scale (SUDS)
from pretreatment through follow-up (i.e. baseline, approx. 2-3 days after, 1 month after)
Change in heart rate reactivity during the BAT
Time Frame: from pretreatment through follow-up (i.e. baseline, approx. 2-3 days after, 1 month after)
from pretreatment through follow-up (i.e. baseline, approx. 2-3 days after, 1 month after)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Change in Acrophobia Questionnaire (AQ)
Time Frame: assessed from pre-treatment through follow-up (i.e. baseline, approx. 2-3 days after, 1 month after
assessed from pre-treatment through follow-up (i.e. baseline, approx. 2-3 days after, 1 month after
Change in Attitude Towards Heights Questionnaire (ATHQ)
Time Frame: assessed from pre-treatment through follow-up (i.e. baseline, approx. 2-3 days after, 1 month after
assessed from pre-treatment through follow-up (i.e. baseline, approx. 2-3 days after, 1 month after
Change in Danger Expectancy Scale (DES)
Time Frame: assessed from pre-treatment through follow-up (i.e. baseline, approx. 2-3 days after, 1 month after
assessed from pre-treatment through follow-up (i.e. baseline, approx. 2-3 days after, 1 month after
Change in Anxiety Expectancy Scale (AES)
Time Frame: assessed from pre-treatment through follow-up (i.e. baseline, approx. 2-3 days after, 1 month after
assessed from pre-treatment through follow-up (i.e. baseline, approx. 2-3 days after, 1 month after

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in perceived self-efficacy
Time Frame: assessed three times on day 1: before and after the exposure session as well as after the intervention; assessed once at posttreatment (window: 2-3 days after exposure treatment); assessed once at follow-up (window: 1 month after treatment)
Changes in perceived self-efficacy will be measures with visual analogue scales (VAS)
assessed three times on day 1: before and after the exposure session as well as after the intervention; assessed once at posttreatment (window: 2-3 days after exposure treatment); assessed once at follow-up (window: 1 month after treatment)
Becks Depression Inventory II (BDI II)
Time Frame: assessed at pre-treatment (day 1)
assessed at pre-treatment (day 1)
State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI)
Time Frame: assessed at pre-treatment (day 1)
assessed at pre-treatment (day 1)
Emotion Regulation Questionnaire (ERQ)
Time Frame: assessed at pre-treatment (day 1)
assessed at pre-treatment (day 1)
General Self-efficacy Scale (GSE)
Time Frame: assessed at pre-treatment (day 1)
assessed at pre-treatment (day 1)
Self-efficacy Scale (SES)
Time Frame: assessed at pre-treatment (day 1)
assessed at pre-treatment (day 1)
Resilience Appraisal Scale (RAS)
Time Frame: assessed after the intervention on day 1
assessed after the intervention on day 1
Salivary cortisol
Time Frame: assessed twice at each of the three assessments, i.e. pretreatment, posttreatment, follow-up (windows: pretreatment on day 1; approx. 2-3 days after; 1 month after)
assessed twice at each of the three assessments, i.e. pretreatment, posttreatment, follow-up (windows: pretreatment on day 1; approx. 2-3 days after; 1 month after)
Changes in "Test zum kognitiven Schätzen" (TKS)
Time Frame: assessed twice on day 1: before and after exposure treatment
assessed twice on day 1: before and after exposure treatment

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Armin Zlomuzica, Dr., Ruhr-University Bochum

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 22, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 29, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

November 29, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 27, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 3, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

April 7, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 11, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 10, 2018

Last Verified

April 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Specific Phobia

Clinical Trials on Self-efficacy enhancement

3
Subscribe