Urodynamic Studies Prior to Surgery for Stress Urinary Incontinence

October 24, 2018 updated by: TriHealth Inc.

Complex Urodynamic Testing: Who Requires it? A Retrospective Review

This retrospective descriptive study is to determine what proportion of Cincinnati Urogynecology Associates patients who underwent surgical management for stress urinary incontinence (SUI) would qualify for a basic office exam (BOE) alone, using the inclusion and exclusion criteria of the Value of Urodynamic Evaluation (VALUE) trial, and thus could have potentially had Urodynamic studies (UDS) omitted from their preoperative workup.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

Urodynamic studies (UDS) are an assessment tool used to evaluate physiologic variables during bladder filling, bladder storage, and bladder emptying. They are commonly performed as part of the routine preoperative evaluation of women with symptoms of SUI. However, UDS are costly, with payments allowed by Medicare quoted at greater than $500, time consuming, uncomfortable, and have been shown to increase the risk of urinary tract infection. But most concerning is the fact that UDS have not been shown to improve surgical outcomes.

In 2012, the Value of Urodynamic Evaluation (VALUE) trial evaluated 630 women who underwent a basic office exam (BOE) or BOE plus UDS, and concluded that for women with uncomplicated, demonstrable SUI a BOE alone was not inferior to evaluation with UDS for outcomes at 1 year. This recent publication has resulted in urogynecology practices across the country evaluating their own standard of care when it comes to preoperative evaluation of SUI.

Cincinnati Urogynecology Associates, TriHealth Inc. standard practice is to perform UDS on all patients undergoing surgery for SUI. The providers of Cincinnati Urogynecology Associates, TriHealth Inc. would be remiss if the providers did not follow this trend and evaluate their own personal practice of preoperative UDS in patients presenting with SUI.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

266

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Ohio
      • Cincinnati, Ohio, United States, 45220
        • Cincinnati Urogynecology Associates

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

All women 18 years of age or older, who under went surgery for SUI performed by a physician at Cincinnati Urogynecology Associates, TriHealth Inc. between January 2015 and December 2015

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • All women 18 years of age or older
  • Underwent surgery for SUI performed by a physician at Cincinnati Urogynecology Associates, TriHealth Inc. between January 2015 and December 2015

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Age < 18 years old
  • Concomitant surgery for anterior or apical pelvic organ prolapse

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
SUI Surgery Patients in 2015
All women 18 years of age or older, who underwent surgery for SUI between January 2015 and December 2015

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Proportion of patients who meet VALUE trial criteria
Time Frame: Within 15 months to the initial presentation
A patient meets all the inclusion criteria and doesn't meet any of exclusion criteria of the VALUE trial will be classified under the category of who meets VALUE trial criteria.
Within 15 months to the initial presentation

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 28, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 25, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

September 7, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 14, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 4, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

April 11, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 25, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 24, 2018

Last Verified

October 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 17-004

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Urodynamic Studies

3
Subscribe