- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT03123731
iSTEP - an mHealth Physical Activity and Diet Intervention for Persons With HIV
August 26, 2024 updated by: Brook Henry, University of California, San Diego
HIV is associated with a pattern of neurocognitive deficits, metabolic dysfunction, and an elevated risk for cardiovascular disease (CVD), phenomena that remain untreated despite the use of medications to control the disease.
This proposal will examine the effect of a personalized, automated, interactive mobile phone text message intervention (iSTEP) designed to increase moderate physical activity (PA), decrease sedentary behavior (SB), and promote a healthy Mediterranean-style diet (MedDiet) in persons living with HIV (PLWH).
The investigators propose that participants who receive the iSTEP intervention will increase the amount of physical activity, improve their diet, show a reduction in risk factors for CVD, and exhibit improved neurocognitive performance.
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
100
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
California
-
San Diego, California, United States, 92103
- HIV Neurobehavioral Research Program
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- ability to provide informed consent
- HIV infection documented at the University of California, San Diego (UCSD) HIV Neurobehavioral Research Program (HNRP) or assessed by an HIV test at screening
- proficient in English
- physically capable of participating in moderate PA as screened by the Physical Activity Readiness Questionnaire
- consent from primary care physician to participate in the study
- able to consume walnuts - no nut allergies
Exclusion Criteria:
- any physical conditions that would prevent moderate physical activity or where moderate physical activity would represent a health risk for the individual, including a history of myocardial infarction or stroke
- unwillingness or inability to participate in daily text messaging
- tree nut allergy that would prevent walnut consumption or other food restrictions that would prevent participation in the Mediterranean-style diet intervention (e.g., unable to eat fish or use olive oil for cooking).
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Prevention
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: Control Arm
Participants will wear a Fitbit but will not receive any additional elements of the iSTEP intervention.
|
Wearing Physical Activity Monitor
|
|
Experimental: iSTEP PA intervention
Participants will wear a Fitbit and receive interactive daily text messages that are designed to motivate moderate physical activity (PA) and reduce sedentary behavior, including setting weekly goals to increase average daily step counts.
|
Physical Activity Intervention
Physical Activity and Diet Intervention
|
|
Experimental: iSTEP PA and diet intervention
Participants will wear a Fitbit and receive interactive daily text messages that are designed to motivate moderate physical activity (PA), reduce sedentary behavior, and promote adherence to a Mediterranean-style diet.
Participants will also be administered diet counseling from a registered dietitian and receive weekly feedback on both physical activity and diet behaviors.
|
Physical Activity Intervention
Physical Activity and Diet Intervention
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Physical Activity - Total Steps Recorded During 24 Weeks
Time Frame: 6 months
|
Total number of steps recorded by the Fitbit over 24 weeks.
Zero is the minimum and there is no maximum.
Higher scores (steps) indicates a better outcome.
|
6 months
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Physical Activity - Change in Average Daily Steps Per Day Between Week 1 and Week 24
Time Frame: 24 weeks
|
This is the change in average daily steps comparing the beginning (Week 1) and end (Week 24) of the intervention.
A higher number is a positive outcome, indicated an increase in steps during the study.
A negative number is a worse outcome, indicating a decline in steps during the intervention.
Zero is the minimum and there is no maximum.
|
24 weeks
|
|
Average Steps Per Day During the 24-week Intervention
Time Frame: 24 weeks
|
This measure reports the average daily steps per day during the entire intervention (over 24 weeks).
A higher number of steps indicates greater physical activity and is a positive outcome.
A lower number of daily steps indicates lower physical activity.
Zero is the minimum and there is no maximum.
|
24 weeks
|
|
C-reactive Protein
Time Frame: 24 weeks
|
The change in C-reactive protein between baseline and the follow-up visit after the 24-week intervention.
Higher numbers indicate that inflammation increased over time, a worse outcome.
Lower numbers indicate less inflammation, a better outcome.
|
24 weeks
|
|
Change in Total Cholesterol.
Time Frame: 24 weeks
|
This measures the change in total plasma cholesterol between the baseline visit and the 24-week follow-up visit.
A decrease in cholesterol is healthy, while an increase is unhealthy.
|
24 weeks
|
|
Level of GPLD1 (Phosphatidylinositol-glycan-specific Phospholipase D) Enzyme at the Baseline Visit
Time Frame: 1 day baseline visit
|
This measures the plasma level of GPLD1 at the baseline study visit before the 24-week intervention.
Higher levels are hypothesized to be positive and associated with better health and lower inflammation.The minimum level is zero and there is no maximum limit.
|
1 day baseline visit
|
|
Change in GPLD1 (Phosphatidylinositol-glycan-specific Phospholipase D) Enzyme Between the Baseline and 24-week Visit
Time Frame: 24 weeks
|
This measures the change in GPLD1 between the baseline and 24-week visit after the study intervention.
An increase in GPLD1 is hypothesized to associate with health benefits, while a decrease is a negative outcome.
|
24 weeks
|
|
Association Between Physical Activity (PA) and GPLD1 (Phosphatidylinositol-glycan-specific Phospholipase d) at Baseline
Time Frame: 1 week
|
This measures the correlation (Pearson r) between GPLD1 (measured on one 1 day) and participant PA (assessed by average daily steps for 1 week) at the baseline before the 24-week intervention.
A positive number indicates that higher GPLD1 was associated with greater PA.
A negative number indicates that higher GPLD1 associates with lower PA.
The minimum value is -1.
The maximum value is +1.
|
1 week
|
|
Association Between the Change in Physical Activity (PA) and Change in GPLD1 (Phosphatidylinositol-glycan-specific Phospholipase d) Between the Baseline Visit and 24-week Visit After the Intervention
Time Frame: 24 weeks
|
This measures the correlation (Pearson r) between the change in GPLD1 across the baseline and 24-week visits and the change in PA (average daily steps) between the first week (Week 1) and last week (Week 24) of the study.
A positive number indicates that an increase in GPLD1 associated with an increase in PA over time, a negative number indicates the opposite.
The minimum value is -1.
The maximum value is +1.
|
24 weeks
|
|
Association Between Cognitive Performance (Executive Function) and GPLD1 (Phosphatidylinositol-glycan-specific Phospholipase d) at the 24-week Visit After the Intervention
Time Frame: 1 day at the end of the 24-week intervention
|
This measures the correlation (Pearson r) between GPLD1 and executive function (measured by T score) at the 24-week visit after the intervention.
A positive number indicates that higher GPLD1 associates with better executive function.
A negative number indicates that higher GPLD1 associates with worse cognition (lower T score).
The minimum value is -1.
The maximum value is +1.
|
1 day at the end of the 24-week intervention
|
|
Association Between the Change in Inflammation (C-reactive Protein, or CRP) and Change in GPLD1 (Phosphatidylinositol-glycan-specific Phospholipase d) Between the Baseline and 24-week Visits.
Time Frame: 24 weeks
|
This measures the correlation (Pearson r) between the change in CRP and the change in GPLD1 across the baseline and 24-week visits.
A positive number indicates that an increase in GPLD1 associated with an increase in CRP (higher inflammation).
A negative number indicates that an increase in GPLD1 associated with a decrease in CRP (lower inflammation).
The minimum value is -1.
The maximum value is +1.
|
24 weeks
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Collaborators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Brook L Henry, Ph.D., University of California, San Diego
Publications and helpful links
The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
December 1, 2018
Primary Completion (Actual)
August 15, 2023
Study Completion (Actual)
August 15, 2023
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
April 11, 2017
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
April 18, 2017
First Posted (Actual)
April 21, 2017
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
September 19, 2024
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
August 26, 2024
Last Verified
August 1, 2024
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
- RNA Virus Infections
- Virus Diseases
- Infections
- Blood-Borne Infections
- Communicable Diseases
- Sexually Transmitted Diseases, Viral
- Sexually Transmitted Diseases
- Lentivirus Infections
- Retroviridae Infections
- Immunologic Deficiency Syndromes
- Immune System Diseases
- Slow Virus Diseases
- Urogenital Diseases
- Genital Diseases
- HIV Infections
- Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome
Other Study ID Numbers
- 161347
- 5R01AG074808 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
NO
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on HIV/AIDS
-
University of MinnesotaWithdrawnHIV Infections | HIV/AIDS | Hiv | AIDS | Aids/Hiv Problem | AIDS and InfectionsUnited States
-
University of California, San DiegoNational Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID)Completed
-
University of Massachusetts, BostonCompleted
-
Stanford UniversityJanssen Services, LLCCompleted
-
ViiV HealthcareJohns Hopkins University; Pfizer; Vanderbilt University; University of North Carolina...Completed
-
Medical College of WisconsinCompleted
-
Emory UniversityCompleted
-
Rhode Island HospitalUnknown
-
Tibotec Pharmaceuticals, IrelandCompleted
-
Lampiris, Harry W., M.D.AbbottUnknown
Clinical Trials on Control Arm
-
Centre Leon BerardNational Cancer Institute, France; Fondation de France; Cancéropôle Lyon Auvergne... and other collaboratorsCompletedImpact of Nutritional Intervention in Women With Breast Cancer Under Adjuvant Chemotherapy (PASAPAS)Breast Cancer | Adequate Physical ConditionFrance
-
Kaiser PermanenteCompletedAdolescent Behavior | Mental Health IssueUnited States
-
Heart of England NHS TrustAstraZenecaUnknown
-
American Hip InstituteArthrex, Inc.RecruitingFemoro Acetabular ImpingementUnited States
-
Zhejiang UniversityShandong UniversityNot yet recruitingDementia | Cognitive FunctionChina
-
Imperial College LondonKing Khalid UniversityCompletedCardiovascular Diseases | Acute Coronary SyndromeUnited Kingdom
-
McGill University Health Centre/Research Institute...Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR); St. Justine's HospitalCompletedDiabetes Mellitus, Type 1 | Type1diabetes | Insulin Dependent DiabetesCanada
-
Lawson Health Research InstituteCompletedChronic Kidney DiseaseCanada
-
Herlev and Gentofte HospitalUniversity of Aarhus; Danish Cancer Society; The Novo Nordic Foundation; University...Active, not recruiting
-
Kaiser Clinic and HospitalCompletedObesity | Weight GainBrazil