Assessment Of Inlay Retained Bridge Designs In Missing Posterior Teeth Cases. (Randomized Clinical Trial)

May 3, 2017 updated by: Mohamed Mahmoud Abdelgawad, Cairo University

Clinical Assessment Of Inlay Retained Bridge Designs (Tub Shaped And Inlay Shaped) In Missing Posterior Teeth Cases. (Randomized Clinical Trial)

Patients with missing back teeth can be restored with an inlay retained bridge.The inlay retained bridge designs include inlay shaped, tub shaped or proximal box shaped.In this study a clinical evaluation will be commenced to evaluate two designs the inlay shaped and the tub shaped.The hypothesis of our trial is that the new design may show longer survival rate due to less stress applied on the restoration which allow the restoration to function for longer period as the inlay shaped bridge showed clinical problems during survice.

Study Overview

Status

Unknown

Conditions

Detailed Description

: This trial will be conducted on patients from the Outpatient clinic in the Fixed Prosthodontics Clinic, Faculty of Oral and Dental Medicine, Cairo University.

- Adherence session will take place in the presence of the patients in the initial visit. This include that the patient will be informed by Abdelfattah M about the study steps and maintenance of oral hygiene instructions. Participants will be asked by Abdelfattah M about if they have any problems like pain.

Motivation and enforcing the maintenance of oral hygiene measures by Abdelfattah M.

The visits will be designated as follows:

Visit 1: Preoperative records, face-to-face adherence reminder session, clinical examination, radiographic examination, intraoral photography and primary impressions (Zhermack ) for diagnostic cast construction ( Zhermack ) . Visit 2: teeth preparations, secondary impression ( Zhermack ) and temporization (Tempofit) .

Visit 3: try in for the restoration. Visit 4: final cementation of the restoration.(GC resin cement) Visit 5: follow up

Sample size:

As there is no previously published effect size data regarding the effectiveness of the intervention or the control, an estimated sample size of 10 bridges would be used with allocation ratio of 1:1.

Recruitment:

The patients who show the inclusion criteria as mentioned will be selected by Abdelfattah M from the outpatient clinic of the fixed prosthodontics department - Cairo University. Screening will be carried out by Abdelfattah M for patients until the target population is reached.

Methods: Assignment of interventions:

Sequence generation The participant will be allocated in to two groups with 1:1 allocation ratio by using computer by Abdelfattah M.

Implementation:

Abdelfattah (the main researcher) will select the patients who show the listed inclusion criteria and divided them into two groups Blinding An independent examiner (not the main researches) will assess the all restorations (double blind study).

Plans to promote participant retention & complete follow-up:

Telephone numbers and addresses of the patients enrolled in the trial will be recorded by Abdelfattah M. All patients will be given a phone call before the next appointment for confirming to their coming. Efforts will be done to achieve proper participant retention like explaining the next procedure to the participant, elaborate to the participants the benefits gained from being enrolled in the study and use a schedule for the next visits.

Data management All data will be managed electronically. Patient files will be stored in numerical order in a secured place. This will be carried out by Abdelfattah M Data analysis All Data will be collected, revised, arranged in tables and entered into the system by Abdelfattah M. Quantitative variables from normal distribution will be expressed as mean and standard deviation (SD) values. To test the significant differences between two groups student t-test will be used. Significant level will be set at P ≤ 0.05. Statistical analysis will be done using Statistical Package for Social Sciences, Version 21.0 (SPSS, IBM, Chicago, III, USA) for Windows.

Data monitoring Data monitoring is the responsibility for the main supervisor (El Mahallawi O). Interim analysis will be done if harms occur.

Harms Any harm or adverse events like pain or failure if happened will be recorded, documented and dealed with as recommended by Abdelfattah M.

Consent Abdelfattah M will discuss all study aspects with all patients, so patients will be able to have an informed discussion with the researcher. Abdelfattah M will obtain written consent from the patients who willing to participate in the study. All consent forms will be in Arabic language Confidentiality All information related to the study will be stored in a secure place. All patients information will be stored in cabinets in areas with limited access. All data processing forms will be identified by a number to maintain participant confidentiality.

Access to data Access to the data is allowed to the investigator and supervisors. The participant study information will be confidential.

Ancillary care All patients will be followed up until the study period is completed. As any prosthetic treatment, post insertion adjustments will be done if necessary and the recall maintenance visits will be arranged.

Dissemination policy

  • The results of the study will be published as partial fulfillments for the doctorate degree in fixed prosthodontics.
  • Topics from the study suggested for presentation or publication will be circulated to the authors.

Data collection:

Primary outcome: the retention of the restoration for both groups will be assessed using MUSPHS criteria.

Secondary outcome: the marginal fit, caries, fracture and gingivitis for both groups will be assessed using the MUSPHS and gingival index.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

12

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 55 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. From 18-55 years old, should be able to read and sign the consent document.
  2. Ability to tolerate the restorative procedures (physical and psychological).
  3. Patients with teeth problems indicated for inlay retained fixed partial denture:

    1. Good oral hygiene
    2. Low susceptibility to decay
    3. Have a minimum coronal tooth height of 5 mm,
    4. Parallel abutments
    5. Sufficient mesio distal edentulous gap dimensions.
  4. With no active periodontal or pulpal problems, with sound teeth or teeth with shallow restorations
  5. Willing to return for follow-up visits.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Partially erupted teeth (young)
  2. Bad oral hygiene and motivation
  3. Root canal treated teeth
  4. Psychiatric problems or unrealistic expectations
  5. Severe parafunctional habits
  6. The absence of enamel on the preparation margins
  7. Extensive crown defects
  8. Abutment mobility

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: inlay shaped inlay bridge design
The inlay shaped inlay bridge design preparation show three types of preparation, the inlay shaped, the tub shaped inlay bridge design and the proximal box shaped designs. Intracoronal preparation of the inlay retained prosthesis for the abutments (inlay shaped and tub shaped) should show the following criteria: The inlay shaped preparation should show an occlusal-proximal box preparation and to be designed with the line angles should be rounded, smooth and rounded corners, and rectangular flat floor with no beveling for the occlusal and gingival margins. The occlusal inlay preparation should have preparation depth allowed for a thickness of 2.0 mm for the material of the bridge. The occlusal reduction show 4 mm width with extension of 4 or 6 mm mesio distally for the posterior teeth.
inlay retained bridge with tub shaped retainer on both abutments
Other Names:
  • tub shaped
Experimental: tub shaped inlay bridge design
The tub-shaped reduction consist of an occlusal proximal inlay and prepared as the same geometry as the inlay shaped preparation, except that for the proximal box preparation which is not present in this preparation design.
inlay retained bridge with tub shaped retainer on both abutments
Other Names:
  • tub shaped

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Retention
Time Frame: 1 year
assess the loss of the restoration (debonding) the scale that will be used is the MUSPHS scale and the measuring unit is score (discrete)
1 year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
marginal adaptation
Time Frame: 1 year
assess the fitting of the restoration on the underlying tooth the scale that will be used is the MUSPHS scale and the measuring unit is score (discrete)
1 year
Caries
Time Frame: 1 year
assess if decay occurred on the abutment teeth the scale that will be used is the MUSPHS scale and the measuring unit is score (discrete)
1 year
gingivitis
Time Frame: 1 year
assess if the gum aroung the teeth is inflamed the scale that will be used is the Gingival index scale and the measuring unit is score (discrete)
1 year
fracture
Time Frame: 1 year
assess if cracks or fracture occurred to the restoration the scale that will be used is the MUSPHS scale and the measuring unit is score (discrete)
1 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Anticipated)

December 1, 2017

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

February 1, 2019

Study Completion (Anticipated)

April 1, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 30, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 30, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

May 4, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 8, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 3, 2017

Last Verified

May 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • CEBD-CU-2017-04-16

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Tooth Loss

Clinical Trials on tub shaped inlay bridge design

3
Subscribe