Use of Protamine for Heparin Reversal After Catheter Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation

September 28, 2018 updated by: Hakan Oral, University of Michigan

Use of Protamine for Heparin Reversal After Catheter Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation: A Randomized Trial

The objective of this study is to evaluate the safety, efficacy and efficiency of rapid anticoagulation reversal with protamine sulfate versus routine activated clotting time (ACT) monitoring in patients undergoing catheter based ablation of atrial fibrillation.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

153

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Michigan
      • Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States, 48109
        • Michigan Medicine

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patient's referred for radiofrequency ablation (RFA) or cryoablation for atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter (left atrial).
  • Age ≥ 18 year
  • Patients who are mentally and linguistically able to understand the aim of the trial, comply with the trial protocol, verbally acknowledge the risks, benefits, and alternatives in this trial.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Previous intolerance or allergy to heparin products.
  • Current or prior administration of protamine products
  • History of femoral access site complications including hematoma, AV fistula, pseudoaneurysm, aneurysm.
  • Known lower extremity venous thrombosis.
  • Coagulopathy or blood dyscrasias.
  • Active malignancy.
  • Thrombocytosis (platelet count >600k/ul) or thrombocytopenia (platelet count <100k/ul)
  • Planned use of vascular closure device

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
NO_INTERVENTION: Control
Patients in the control arm will undergo routine post-procedure management prior to removal of vascular sheaths. This includes routine measurements of ACT beginning 90 min after the cessation of the procedure with a goal ACT of <200s or return to pre-procedural baseline prior to sheath removal.
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Protamine
Patients in the active comparator arm will receive protamine sulfate for rapid reversal of heparin prior to sheath removal. They will first receive a small test dose with close hemodynamic monitoring followed by therapeutic dose if no reaction occurs.ACT levels will then be monitored with a goal ACT of <200s or return to preprocedural baseline prior to removal of vascular sheaths.
Protamine sulfate is a highly basic protein that forms stable compounds with acidic heparin to rapidly neutralize the anticoagulation effects.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Time to Ambulation
Time Frame: 0 to 24 hours
Total length of time from procedural termination to patient ambulation
0 to 24 hours

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Count of Participants Who Experienced Vascular Access Site Complications
Time Frame: checked at 30 and 90 days
Secondary endpoints will include the number of patients who experience a 90-day occurrence of vascular access site complications defined as hematoma formation, aneurysm, pseudoaneurysm, arteriovenous fistula formation, access-site related major bleeding (defined as Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) type 3a or 5), or procedural intervention for access complications (surgical repair, thrombin injection, et cetera)
checked at 30 and 90 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

March 23, 2017

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

November 16, 2017

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

April 3, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 3, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 2, 2017

First Posted (ACTUAL)

May 4, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

October 23, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 28, 2018

Last Verified

September 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Atrial Fibrillation

Clinical Trials on Protamine Sulfate

3
Subscribe