Efficacy and Safety of Dalbavancin Compared to Standard of Care Antibiotic Therapy for the Completion of Treatment of Patients With Complicated Bacteremia or Infective Endocarditis

March 28, 2022 updated by: AbbVie

Phase 2, Open-Label, Randomized, Multicenter Study to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of Dalbavancin to Standard of Care Antibiotic Therapy for the Completion of Treatment of Patients With Complicated Bacteremia or Documented Infective Endocarditis

This study will compare dalbavancin to standard of care (SOC) antibiotic therapy for the completion of therapy in patients with complicated bacteremia or infective endocarditis.

Study Overview

Status

Terminated

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

2

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Florida
      • Fort Pierce, Florida, United States, 34982
        • Midway Immunology and Research Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • A diagnosis of complicated bacteremia or infective endocarditis
  • Gram-positive bacteremia at screening with methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA), methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) or Streptococci
  • Treatment with standard of care antibiotics for 72 hours (h) - 10 days
  • Defervescence for at least 24h and clearance of bacteremia from screening pathogen.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Embolic events
  • History of prosthetic valve surgery, cardiac device or prosthetic joint
  • Left-sided endocarditis due to Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus)
  • Large mobile vegetations (>10 mm) on mitral valves
  • Perivalvular abscess
  • Uncomplicated bacteremia due to S. aureus
  • Gram-negative bacteria or fungi in blood cultures
  • Heart failure associated with infective endocarditis [Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) <40%]
  • Intravascular material or removable infection source not intended to be removed within 4 days postrandomization
  • Planned valve replacement surgery within 3 days of randomization
  • Refractory shock, significant hepatic insufficiency or severe leukopenia [Absolute Neutrophil Count (ANC) < 500 cells/mm^3]
  • Known osteomyelitis
  • Hypersensitivity to dalbavancin or other drugs in glycopeptide class
  • Infection with enterococci, coagulase-negative staphylococci, or with organism not susceptible to dalbavancin or vancomycin
  • Immunosuppression/immune deficiency
  • Concomitant systemic antibacterial therapy for gram-positive infection other than that allowed in protocol
  • Pregnant or nursing females.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Dalbavancin
Dalbavancin 1500 mg, intravenous (IV) administration over 30 minutes on Day 1, and on Day 8.
Dalbavancin 1500 mg, intravenous (IV) administration over 30 minutes on Day 1, and on Day 8.
Active Comparator: Standard of Care
Antibiotic consistent with Standard of Care (SOC), based on baseline pathogen, for 4 to 6 weeks.
Antibiotic consistent with Standard of Care (SOC), based on baseline pathogen, for 4 to 6 weeks.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Participants With Clinical Response at Day 84 in the Intent-to Treat (ITT) Population
Time Frame: Day 84
Clinical response was either success or failure. Success was defined as resolution of clinical signs and symptoms of complicated bacteremia or infective endocarditis (IE) such that no additional antibiotic therapy was required. Failure was defined as: ongoing signs and symptoms considered by the investigator to be related to complicated bacteremia or IE requiring additional antibacterial therapy or unplanned valve replacement, recurrent bacteremia, death during the study period up to Day 84 or discontinuation of the study medication due to an adverse event.
Day 84

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of Participants With Clinical Outcome of Success at Day 42 in the ITT Population
Time Frame: Day 42
Clinical outcome was either success or failure. Success was defined as resolution of clinical signs and symptoms of complicated bacteremia or infective endocarditis (IE) such that no additional antibiotic therapy was required.
Day 42
Percentage of Participants With Clinical Outcome of Success at Day 42 in the Clinically Evaluable (CE) Population
Time Frame: Day 42
Clinical outcome was either success or failure. Success was defined as resolution of clinical signs and symptoms of complicated bacteremia or infective endocarditis (IE) such that no additional antibiotic therapy was required.
Day 42
Number of Participants With Day 84 Mortality in the Safety Population
Time Frame: Day 84
Day 84 mortality was measured by the number of deaths up to Day 84.
Day 84
Percentage of Participants With Clinical Outcome of Success at Day 84 in the CE Population
Time Frame: Day 84
Clinical outcome was either success or failure/relapse. Success was defined as resolution of clinical signs and symptoms of complicated bacteremia or infective endocarditis (IE) such that no additional antibiotic therapy was required.
Day 84
Percentage of Participants With Clinical Outcome of Success by Pathogen at Day 42 in the ITT Population
Time Frame: Day 42
Clinical outcome was either success or failure. Success was defined as resolution of clinical signs and symptoms of complicated bacteremia or infective endocarditis (IE) such that no additional antibiotic therapy was required.
Day 42
Percentage of Participants With Clinical Outcome of Success by Pathogen at Day 84 in the ITT Population
Time Frame: Day 84
Clinical outcome was either success or failure. Success was defined as resolution of clinical signs and symptoms of complicated bacteremia or infective endocarditis (IE) such that no additional antibiotic therapy was required.
Day 84
Percentage of Participants With Clinical Outcome of Success by Pathogen at Day 42 in the CE Population
Time Frame: Day 42
Clinical outcome was either success or failure. Success was defined as resolution of clinical signs and symptoms of complicated bacteremia or infective endocarditis (IE) such that no additional antibiotic therapy was required.
Day 42
Percentage of Participants With Clinical Outcome of Success by Pathogen at Day 84 in the CE Population
Time Frame: Day 84
Clinical outcome was either success or failure. Success was defined as resolution of clinical signs and symptoms of complicated bacteremia or infective endocarditis (IE) such that no additional antibiotic therapy was required.
Day 84
Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen at Day 42 in the ITT Population
Time Frame: Day 42
Microbiological outcome could be either microbiologic success or microbiologic failure. Microbiologic Success was defined as no further growth of baseline pathogen from blood cultures.
Day 42
Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen at Day 84 in the ITT Population
Time Frame: Day 84
Microbiological outcome could be either microbiologic success or microbiologic failure. Microbiologic Success was defined as no further growth of baseline pathogen from blood cultures.
Day 84
Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen at Day 42 in the CE Population
Time Frame: Day 42
Microbiological outcome could be either microbiologic success or microbiologic failure. Microbiologic Success was defined as no further growth of baseline pathogen from blood cultures.
Day 42
Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Success by Pathogen at Day 84 in the CE Population
Time Frame: Day 84
Microbiological outcome could be either microbiologic success or microbiologic failure. Microbiologic Success was defined as no further growth of baseline pathogen from blood cultures.
Day 84

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Study Director: Urania Rappo, MD, Allergan

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 12, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

August 4, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

August 4, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 9, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 9, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

May 11, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 25, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 28, 2022

Last Verified

March 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Bacteremia

Clinical Trials on Dalbavancin

3
Subscribe