Evaluation of a New Strategy for the Diagnosis of Peroxisomal Diseases (PEROXY4G)

February 6, 2023 updated by: University Hospital, Lille
The principal aim of the study is to avoid the diagnostic wanderings of patients suffering from a peroxisomal disorder. For this purpose, a new diagnostic strategy is proposed. It rests on functional metabolic explorations and gene studies directly connected to a first-line enlarged physico-chemical detection of metabolites from peroxisomal origin in clinically suspect patients.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

60

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Amiens, France, 80054
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Département de Pédiatrie, Unité de Génétique Clinique, CHU d'Amiens
      • Caen, France, 40433
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Pédiatrie, CHU Clémenceau de Caen
      • Lille, France
        • Recruiting
        • Hôpital Jeanne de Flandres, CHRU
      • Rouen, France, 76031
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Pédiatrie, Pavillon Mère et Enfant, CHU Ch. Nicolle de Rouen

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • ADULT
  • OLDER_ADULT
  • CHILD

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

The studied population is represented by only one group of patients checking the inclusion criteria and recruited in the 4 University Hospital centers (Amiens, Caen, Lille and Rouen). For each patient, diagnostic exploration will start in patients with the common inclusion criteria and will include the study of all biochemical parameters susceptible to be disturbed In peroxisomal pathologies (Biology component). Based on the data obtained, the inclusion of patients will lead to biological confirmation tests (Cell Exploration and Enzymology) and molecular studies (Molecular Biology).

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

I - CLINICAL/BIOLOGICAL CRITERIA For an efficient screening of the patients of the 4 contributing University Hospitals (Amiens, Caen, Lille and Rouen), various inclusion criteria were selected: In general, the inclusion criterion is the existence of a positive biology or in turn the persistence of a clinical suspicion in spite of a negative biology.

I A - Children from 0 to 17 years:

The clinical inclusion criterion is a positive biology or the persistence of a clinical suspicion in spite of a negative biology. This persistent clinical suspicion is left to the discretion of the clinician. It is essentially based on the existence of a family history of peroxisomal (or suspected) pathology and / or the combination of several clinical signs of craniofacial dysmorphism, skeletal abnormalities, encephalopathy (seizures, ataxia, Hypotonia), demyelinating peripheral neuropathy, ophthalmopathy (retinopathy, cataract), hepatic impairment (hyperbilirubinemia, hepatomegaly, cholestasis) and growth retardation OR I B - Adults from 18 years

The neurological symptoms of peroxisomal diseases in adulthood are numerous and non-specific. The three inclusion criteria selected for patient selection are as follows:

  • Cognitive impairment (delayed acquisition or regression) and / or leukodystrophy AND At least one of the following signs: Cerebellar ataxia, Spastic paraparesis, Peripheral neuropathy, Neurosensory deafness, Retinitis pigmentosa, Epilepsy, Unexplained unexplained vigilance, Peripheral corticotropic insufficiency +/- gonadotropic AND
  • no evidence for an extraperoxisomal origin of the patient disease stated after the usual paraclinic explorations

II - NON CLINICAL CRITERIA

  • Social insurances
  • Having understood the information note and having signed the informed consent form.
  • Patients under guardianship or curatorship may be included, since peroxisomal diseases as a cause of neurological impairment may potentially lead to guardianship.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnant or nursing women
  • Person deprived of liberty or in emergency situations

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of cases diagnosed by the new procedure versus the number of patients included.
Time Frame: 14 months

Evaluation of a diagnostic strategy based on functional metabolic explorations and gene studies directly connected to a first-line enlarged physico-chemical detection of metabolites from peroxisomal origin in clinically or biologically suspect patients

The study is concomitant with an implementation in the routine Hospitals of the inter-region (West and North of France) of an immediate wide exploration (and not sequential and optional) of diagnostic markers of a pathology peroxisomal. This wide exploration should by itself lead to a diagnosis enrichment and should increase the number of inclusions. But the study, for patients thus included, is also considering an enlarged scanning of functional and genetic explorations that follow inclusion (instead of targeted screening guided primarily by the biological anomaly in the usual practice).

14 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of new cases diagnosed by the new procedure in relation to the number of habitants per year.
Time Frame: 14 months
Evaluation of a diagnostic strategy based on functional metabolic explorations
14 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

December 17, 2018

Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)

December 1, 2023

Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)

December 1, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 22, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 22, 2017

First Posted (ACTUAL)

May 23, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

February 8, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 6, 2023

Last Verified

February 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2015_12
  • 2016-A01147-44 (OTHER: ID-RCB number, ANSM)
  • PHRCI_2014 (OTHER: PHRC number, DGOS)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Diagnoses Disease

3
Subscribe