- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT05399511
GP Response to Decontextualised Risk
How Does Decontextualized Risk Information Affect Clinicians Understanding of Diagnostic Risk and Uncertainty in Primary Care Diagnosis? A Qualitative Study of Clinical Vignettes
Decontextualised risk information is any information pertaining to diagnosis, which is introduced into a clinical consultation, or a diagnostic thought process, without being requested by the clinician. It can be risk scores, computerised warnings, or lab tests or diagnostic imaging requests ordered by other clinicians. It is a concept which (to our knowledge) has not been studied.
Clinical vignettes have been developed to simulate scenarios where decontextualised risk is introduced into a consultation. These will be presented to primary care clinicians via video, who will then undergo a structured interview to explore how their perception, processing and communication of risk is challenged and changed by decontextualised risk. The findings will be analysed used qualitative methods (Thematic Analysis).
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Detailed Description
The standard model of a medical consultation involves a patient describing their symptoms to a clinician who then performs a physical examination. At this point a decision is made with the patient whether further information regarding diagnosis is needed: this is often further tests, but can be "risk scores", where various metrics including observations, age etc combine to produce an output which helps clarify the diagnosis in question. This moment, when a clinician decides if further tests or scores (or "risk" information) should be done is significant. In several studies, the eventual discovery of severe disease (such as cancer) has been found to be associated to a greater degree with the decision to do a test, then the actual outcome of the test itself.
If a clinician has not requested this new risk information, this could present a challenge to that professional's clinical thinking. I have called it "decontextualised risk information": risk information that is presented out of sync with when a clinician would normally gather such information, and out of the context of the normal diagnostic thought processes. Examples include the processing of tests a clinician has not ordered, the routine use of scores such as the NEWS2, and computer triggered electronic risk scores.
In primary care the chance of a serious disease being present is less than in A&E or specialist settings. All tests are wrong some of the time and can produce false negative results (when the test is negative but the disease is there) and false positive results (when a test is positive, but the disease is not present). This second situation becomes more prevalent the rarer a condition is to begin with. It means that, in primary care, the decision not to perform a test or diagnostic score is both more common, and more likely to be a reasonable decision.
This study will examine how "decontextualised risk information" affects clinicians' consideration of diagnostic risk and uncertainty. Clinical vignettes have been developed to simulate scenarios where decontextualised risk is introduced into a consultation. These will be presented to primary care clinicians via video, who will then undergo a structured interview to explore how their perception, processing and communication of risk is challenged and changed by decontextualised risk. The findings will be analysed used qualitative methods (Thematic Analysis).
Study Type
Enrollment (Anticipated)
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
- Name: Alex Burns, MBBS
- Phone Number: 07773394183
- Email: ab1265@exeter.ac.uk
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Sarah Dean, PhD
- Phone Number: 01392722984
- Email: S.Dean@exeter.ac.uk
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Sampling Method
Study Population
Given the possibility that there may be variable responses from clinicians from different backgrounds, experience and type of practice, the sampling will be purposeful. It will aim to include the following "profile" mix:
Gender Early career and late career clinicians Small and large practice size Part time and full time Self-described high and low risk tolerant GPs
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- GPs working in primary care in the UK are eligible
Exclusion Criteria:
- No current direct patient contact in a primary care setting
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
Cohorts and Interventions
Group / Cohort |
---|
Practising GPs
GPs working in primary care setting.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Qualitative data
Time Frame: At time of interview
|
Qualitative information from "think aloud" and semi-structured interview
|
At time of interview
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Alex Burns, MBBS, University of Exeter
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Anticipated)
Primary Completion (Anticipated)
Study Completion (Anticipated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 2021-22-25
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Diagnoses Disease
-
Inspirata Europe Ltd.CompletedDiagnoses DiseaseUnited Kingdom
-
Shanghai Chest HospitalUnknownDiagnoses DiseaseChina
-
Nazan Kocak TopbasMersin UniversityNot yet recruiting
-
Brigham and Women's HospitalCricoActive, not recruiting
-
Istanbul Bilgi UniversityUnknown
-
Hospital do CoracaoCompletedInpatient Facililty DiagnosesBrazil
-
Institute of Liver and Biliary Sciences, IndiaCompleted
-
Nagaoka Red Cross HospitalUnknownOther Diagnoses and ConditionsJapan
-
Doha FahmyAssiut UniversityUnknownDiagnoses Disease
-
Anhui Medical UniversityTechnion, Israel Institute of TechnologyNot yet recruitingCancer | Diagnoses Disease | Volatile Organic Compounds