Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation for Cognitive Improvement in Parkinson's Patients (tDCS) (tDCS)

December 29, 2023 updated by: Sanford Health

Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) to Improve Cognitive Function and Cognitive Fatigue in Parkinson's Patients

The investigators hypothesize that multi-session anodal tDCS (atDCS) of the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (LDLPFC) will induce long-lasting effects in improving cognitive function and reducing cognitive fatigue and fatigability in PD patients.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Parkinson's disease (PD) is the second most common neurodegenerative disease (after Alzheimer's disease) and affects approximately one million people in the United States. Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) is very common even in early stages of PD. In addition to cognitive impairment, patients with PD also suffer cognitive fatigue (defined as the general sensation of difficulty in initiating cognitive activity) and cognitive fatigability (defined as "deterioration in the performance of attention tasks over an extended period of time"). Cognitive impairment, cognitive fatigue, and cognitive fatigability affect quality of life in patient with Parkinson's disease.

Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a noninvasive and safe brain stimulation technique that has been shown to be effective in improving cognitive function in subjects with Parkinson's disease. During tDCS, low-voltage, low amplitude current is passed through a pair of surface electrodes placed over the areas of brain of interest.

The specific aim of this study is to examine if atDCS to LDLPFC at 2 milliamps (mA) for 20 minutes daily for 5 days will improve cognitive function and reduce cognitive fatigue and fatigability in PD patients with MCI. The study will examine if the effects may last for two weeks.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

40

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • North Dakota
      • Fargo, North Dakota, United States, 58103
        • Recruiting
        • Sanford Brain & Spine Center
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Jau-Shin Lou, MD
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Clinical diagnosis of PD with at least two of the four diagnostic criteria for PD (tremor, rigidity, bradykinesia, and postural instability)
  • Meets criteria for MCI (21 ≤ MOCA scores ≤ 26)
  • Must be able to consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with dementia (MOCA < 21)
  • PD treatment using deep brain stimulation (DBS)
  • Diagnosis of psychosis
  • Diagnosis of multiple sclerosis
  • Diagnosis of stroke
  • Diagnosis of epilepsy
  • Diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
  • Diagnosis of congestive heart failure
  • Diagnosis of renal failure
  • Participants not fluent in English

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Experimental group
The experimental group will receive 2 milliamps of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation for 20 minutes daily for 5 days.
2milliamps will be administered for 5 consecutive days for a duration of 20 minutes with electrode placement at the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex.
Other Names:
  • Magstim
  • HDCstim
  • HDCkit
Sham Comparator: Sham group
The sham group will be connected to the anodal transcranial direct current stimulation device daily for 5 days. During the 20 minute sessions, the participant will only receive stimulation for a 30-second ramp up period, at which point the stimulation will be discontinued for the remainder of the time.
For 30 seconds the patient will experience a ramp up of the stimulation, after which point no stimulation will be transmitted for the remainder of the session. This will be administered for 5 consecutive days for a duration of 20 minutes with electrode placement at the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Reaction Time (RT) on contextual cueing computer task
Time Frame: 90 minutes; pre-test during the second research visit, post-test on 6th research visit after 5 consecutive days of tDCS, a follow up test on the 7th research visit, 7 days after last tDCS session and 8th visit 14 days after last tDCS session
A visual search task will be given in which the participant looks for a T among L's. The contextual cuing task will consist of a practice block and forty test blocks. Eight of the trials in a block will consist of search configurations that repeat from block to block (repeat configurations); the other eight trials in a block will be randomly-generated configurations (new configurations). After the final trial, a recognition task will be presented to determine whether participants realized that repeat configurations were presented (not expected; cueing effects appear to result from implicit learning). Reaction time for each block will be recorded, with cognitive fatigue measured as deterioration of RT over the 40 blocks. This measure of change in RT will be compared across the 4 visits (pre-test, 6th visit, 7th visit, and 8th visit). Improved cognition fatigue based on tDCS treatment would predict reduced change in RT in the later visits compared to the pre-test.
90 minutes; pre-test during the second research visit, post-test on 6th research visit after 5 consecutive days of tDCS, a follow up test on the 7th research visit, 7 days after last tDCS session and 8th visit 14 days after last tDCS session

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Error Rate on contextual cueing computer task
Time Frame: 90 minutes; pre-test during the second research visit, post-test on 6th research visit after 5 consecutive days of tDCS, a follow up test on the 7th research visit, 7 days after last tDCS session and 8th visit 14 days after last tDCS session
A visual search task will be given in which the participant looks for a T among L's. The contextual cuing task will consist of a practice block and forty test blocks. Eight of the trials in a block will consist of search configurations that repeat from block to block (repeat configurations); the other eight trials in a block will be randomly-generated configurations (new configurations). After the final trial, a recognition task will be presented to determine whether participants realized that repeat configurations were presented (not expected; cueing effects appear to result from implicit learning). Error rate for each block will be recorded, with cognitive fatigue measured as increased errors over the 40 blocks. This measure of change in error rate will be compared across the 4 visits (pre-test, 6th visit, 7th visit, and 8th visit). Improved cognition fatigue based on tDCS treatment would predict reduced change in error rate in the later visits compared to the pre-test.
90 minutes; pre-test during the second research visit, post-test on 6th research visit after 5 consecutive days of tDCS, a follow up test on the 7th research visit, 7 days after last tDCS session and 8th visit 14 days after last tDCS session
Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory (MFI)
Time Frame: 5 minutes; pre-test during the second research visit, post-test on 6th research visit after 5 consecutive days of tDCS, a follow up test on the 7th research visit, 7 days after last tDCS session and 8th visit 14 days after last tDCS session
This is a 20-item self-report instrument that measures five dimensions of fatigue independently: general fatigue, physical fatigue, mental fatigue, reduced motivation, and reduced activity.
5 minutes; pre-test during the second research visit, post-test on 6th research visit after 5 consecutive days of tDCS, a follow up test on the 7th research visit, 7 days after last tDCS session and 8th visit 14 days after last tDCS session
Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale (CES-D)
Time Frame: 5 minutes; pre-test during the second research visit, post-test on 6th research visit after 5 consecutive days of tDCS, a follow up test on the 7th research visit, 7 days after last tDCS session and 8th visit 14 days after last tDCS session
This is a tool used to screen for symptoms of depression.
5 minutes; pre-test during the second research visit, post-test on 6th research visit after 5 consecutive days of tDCS, a follow up test on the 7th research visit, 7 days after last tDCS session and 8th visit 14 days after last tDCS session
McGill Quality of Life (QOL) Scale
Time Frame: 1 minute; pre-test during the second research visit, post-test on 6th research visit after 5 consecutive days of tDCS, a follow up test on the 7th research visit, 7 days after last tDCS session and 8th visit 14 days after last tDCS session
This is a single item tool to assess quality of life on all parts of life (physical, emotional, social, spiritual, and financial.
1 minute; pre-test during the second research visit, post-test on 6th research visit after 5 consecutive days of tDCS, a follow up test on the 7th research visit, 7 days after last tDCS session and 8th visit 14 days after last tDCS session
Neuropsychological battery (Stroop and Digit Span)
Time Frame: 10 minutes; pre-test during the second research visit, post-test on 6th research visit after 5 consecutive days of tDCS, a follow up test on the 7th research visit, 7 days after last tDCS session and 8th visit 14 days after last tDCS session
The Stroop Test is a measure of processing speed, attention, and inhibition. In Stroop A, the participant is required to read color words (e.g., Red, Green, etc.) out loud quickly for 45 seconds. In Stroop B, the participant is required to name ink colors out loud as quickly as possible for 45 seconds. In Stroop C, the participants are required to name the color ink of opposing color words (e.g., the word "blue" written in red ink with the correct response being "red"). Digit Span forward is a measure of simple attention. Participants repeat progressively longer series of numbers until the participant can no longer complete the task. Digit Span Backward is a measure of working memory. The participant repeats back a series of numbers in reverse order. The series length increase until the participant can no longer complete the task.
10 minutes; pre-test during the second research visit, post-test on 6th research visit after 5 consecutive days of tDCS, a follow up test on the 7th research visit, 7 days after last tDCS session and 8th visit 14 days after last tDCS session
Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MOCA)
Time Frame: 8 minutes; pre-test during the second research visit and post-test on 8th visit 14 days after last tDCS session
This is a tool used to screen for mild cognitive dysfunctions. It assesses different domains of cognition: attention, memory, language visuospatial skills, orientation, and calculations.
8 minutes; pre-test during the second research visit and post-test on 8th visit 14 days after last tDCS session

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Jau-Shin Lou, MD, Sanford Health

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 19, 2015

Primary Completion (Estimated)

August 7, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

August 31, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 28, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 14, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

June 19, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

January 3, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 29, 2023

Last Verified

December 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Parkinson Disease

Clinical Trials on transcranial direct current stimulation

3
Subscribe