Direct Comparison of SVOne Obtained Refraction to Subjective Manifest Refraction

July 17, 2017 updated by: Smart Vision Labs
The purpose of the study is to compare the final glasses prescription based on refraction obtained with SVOne device to the final prescription obtained via subjective manifest refraction.

Study Overview

Status

Unknown

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Uncorrected refractive error is the leading cause of vision impairment and the second leading cause of blindness worldwide, affecting 1 in 90 individuals (1). In the US population approximately 14 million individuals aged 12 years or older have visual impairment (defined as distance visual acuity of 20/50 or worse), of which more than 11 million individuals (2) could have their vision improved to 20/40 or better with refractive correction.

Uncorrected refractive error impacts all aspects of life, including, but not limited to, loss of employment opportunities, inability to care for family, and inability to receive an education. SVOne is smartphone-based autorefractor, powered by wavefront aberrometry, due to its portability and accuracy it presents as an effective and accessible method of detecting refractive error and dispensing spectacles for better vision (3).

In this study, for each patient, a single clinician will determine final prescription through manifest refraction, while a different clinician will determine final prescription using SVOne exam protocol. Sphere, cylinder and axis will be converted to power vectors and compared by linear regression analysis.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

200

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Texas
      • Houston, Texas, United States, 77056
        • Dr. Rosa Pham & Associates

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

12 years to 65 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT, CHILD)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Population with refractive error between -14.00 to +14.00 diopter of spherical error and astigmatism up to -7.00 diopters.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Subjects must be 12 (under 18 with parental consent) years of age and older up to 65 years of age.
  • No known ocular pathology from previous clinical exams that may limit best corrected visual acuity.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Refractive error greater than +/- 14.00 diopters, or astigmatism greater than -7.00 diopters.
  • Known ocular (corneal, lenticular, vitreal, or retinal) pathology that may limit BCVA.
  • Best corrected visual acuity with spectacles of 20/25 or worse.
  • Any previous surgical or laser procedures that may limit BCVA
  • 11 years of age and younger

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Sphere, cylinder and axis measurement for each patient
Time Frame: 4 months
the outcome includes sphere, cylinder and axis measurement (in diopter) by using both SVOne wave-guided autorefractor and subjective manifest refraction
4 months
Comparison of two measurements on the same patient
Time Frame: 4 months
the outcome will include comparison of two sphere, cylinder and axis measurements (in power vectors) for each patient obtained with SVOne wave-guided autorefractor and subjective manifest refraction.
4 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ANTICIPATED)

September 1, 2017

Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)

November 1, 2017

Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)

November 1, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 10, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 17, 2017

First Posted (ACTUAL)

July 19, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

July 19, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 17, 2017

Last Verified

July 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • SVOne01

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Refractive Errors

Clinical Trials on Refraction

3
Subscribe