The Impact on Ovarian Reserve of Ovarian Cystectomy Versus Laser Vaporization in the Treatment of Ovarian Endometrioma: a Randomized Clinical Trial (Laser)

July 20, 2017 updated by: Massimo Candiani, Scientific Institute San Raffaele

This is a prospective, multicentric (two centers: 1:San Raffaele Scientific institute, Milan, Italy; 2:Jagiellonian University, Collegium Medicum, Cracow, Poland), randomized (1:1) clinical trial that includes patients undergoing surgery for primary unilateral or bilateral symptomatic endometriomas.

The aim of the study is to determine whether and to what extent the two surgical procedures for endometrioma, cystectomy and laser vaporization, affect ovarian reserve. Recently, cystectomy has been questioned as an ideal surgical approach because it may involve excessive removal of ovarian tissue and the loss of follicles; laser vaporization has been proposed as a promising method to preserve ovarian function.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Excisional surgery is the recommended treatment for ovarian endometrioma because of higher pregnancy rate and lower recurrence rate compared with ablative techniques. From the standpoint of ovarian reserve, the efficiency of cystectomy remains a topic of considerable debate: in recent years, cystectomy has been questioned as an ideal surgical approach for endometriomas because it is associated with excessive removal of ovarian tissue and loss of ovarian follicles with subsequent reduction of ovarian reserve. According to a recent report, absence of follicular growth was observed in 13% of operated ovaries, although this event never occurred in the contralateral gonad.

In San Raffaele Scientific Institute, fear of ovarian failure after cystectomy resulted in the introduction of an ablative technique involving CO2 laser technology, which posses the ability to deliver energy with little thermal spread. More than 80 patients were treated with CO2 laser at this Institution during three-year experience. This surgical procedure was inspired by the one employed by Jacques Donnez for more than 20 years, in which CO2 laser is used to ablate endometriomas' inner wall, after 3-months GnRHa therapy. Laser vaporization, according to the ''three-step procedure", has also been proposed as the best method to preserve ovarian function; moreover, reassuring data on the rate of long-term recurrence after laser vaporization have recently been published.

However, no data are available about the single use of CO2 laser fiber vaporization (without GnRHa therapy) with respect to the ovarian reserve.

Since 2015, the investigators have continuously evaluated the benefits of CO2 laser vaporization through a clinical trial assessing the postoperative changes in ovarian reserve as indicated by antral follicle count (AFC) and anti-mullerian hormone (AMH); the results of this pilot study support the positive effects of CO2 laser on ovarian reserve as demonstrated by higher AFC and no change in AMH at 3-month follow-up. In order to provide more conclusive data about the potential advantage of CO2 laser ablation with respect to ovarian cystectomy in terms of fertility outcomes a prospective randomized trial has been planned; the aim of this prospective randomized study is to determine whether and to what extent the two surgical procedures for ovarian endometrioma (cystectomy versus C02 laser vaporization) affect ovarian reserve.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

100

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Milan, Italy
        • Recruiting
        • San Raffaele Scientific Institute
        • Contact:
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Laura M Castellano, MD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Jessica Ottolina, MD
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Massimo Candiani, MD Prof
      • Cracow, Poland
        • Recruiting
        • Jagiellonian University, Collegium Medicum, Cracow, Poland
        • Contact:
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Ewa Posadzka, MD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Robert Jach, MD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 37 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • unilateral or bilateral endometriomas
  • pain and/or infertility associated with endometriomas
  • largest diameter of the endometrioma ≥3 cm and ≤ 8 cm

Exclusion Criteria:

  • intra-operative detection of deep infiltrating endometriosis
  • evidence of adenomyosis at the preoperative ultrasound
  • previous surgical procedures on the ovaries
  • previous unilateral oophorectomy
  • previous salpingectomy or hysterectomy
  • thyroid disease
  • hyperprolactinemia
  • diabetes mellitus
  • adrenal disorders
  • suspected or proven ovarian malignancy
  • evidence of premature ovarian failure (POF) or premature menopause
  • hormonal treatment within 3 months from baseline ovarian reserve assessment and 3 months after surgery.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: stripping
standardized laparoscopic stripping technique
The cyst is stripped from the healthy ovary by traction and countertraction; after the removal of the cyst, hemostasis is achieved by selective bipolar coagulation.
Experimental: CO2 laser vaporization
drainage of the cyst content and vaporization of the internal wall with CO2 laser
The cyst content is drained and the internal wall is vaporized with CO2 laser beam (AcuPulse Duo, Lumenis, Israel)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
changes in antral follicle count (AFC)
Time Frame: baseline and 3 months
number of follicles with average diameter of 2-10 mm in both ovaries assessed on the second and fifth day of the menstrual cycle
baseline and 3 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
changes in serum antimullerian hormone (AMH) levels
Time Frame: baseline and 3 months
AMH is assessed on venous blood samples (Beckman-Coulter 2nd-generation; Gen II) obtained on day 2-5 of the menstrual cycle
baseline and 3 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Massimo Candiani, MD Prof, San Raffaele Scientific Institute

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 1, 2016

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

August 1, 2017

Study Completion (Anticipated)

January 1, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 9, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 20, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

July 24, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 24, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 20, 2017

Last Verified

July 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • LaserLuM

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Undecided

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Endometrioma

Clinical Trials on stripping technique

3
Subscribe