Evaluation of Audio-Visual Distraction Technique on Child's Anxiety

July 24, 2017 updated by: Sherif Adel Khalaf Zakhary, Cairo University

Effectiveness of Audio-Visual Distraction Technique Versus Normal Dental Environment for Management of Anxiety in Pediatric Dental Patients, A Randomized Clinical Trial

Audio-Visual (AV) Distraction is a recent modality introduced to the entertaining market technology for adults and children. Some practitioners started using this modality of distraction in the dental practice to aid in psychological management of patients.

This study is designed to compare between conventional dental visits (No Distraction) and dental visits aided with audio-visual distraction. Providing a safe, comfortable and entertaining dental environment will give pediatric children a better perception regarding the dental environment and motivate them for repetitive dental visits for better dental health care.

Study Overview

Status

Unknown

Detailed Description

[I] Recruitment: Children aged 5~8 years old with teeth decay requiring restorative dental treatment will be randomly selected according to the Intrusion and Extrusion Criteria.

[II] Intervention:

-Steps:

  1. The operator will select the teeth; child must have decayed tooth requiring restorative dental treatment.
  2. The visit will be started by using the tell-show-do technique to explain the procedure. After that the Facial Image Scale is validated to assess dental anxiety and will be explained to the child. The dentist will ask the child to choose one of the six faces that best represented his/her current emotional state.
  3. Pulse oximeter sensor will then be placed and initial pulse rate will be obtained.
  4. Patient will choose from a bowl a piece of paper to decide if AV-distraction will be used or not.
  5. Above steps will be done in both visits, with and without the intervention.
  6. If the toss had AV-distraction, The operator will introduce the Audio-visual device (Virtual Reality Eye Glasses) to the patient and how it works and will allow the patient to choose his favorite show to watch during the dental visit.
  7. The operator will instruct the patient with the rules that will be applied during the dental visit to assure complete cooperation.
  8. The operator will apply topical and dental anaesthesia
  9. Pulse rate will be measured every 5 minutes.
  10. The operator will allow extra time if the dental visit ended before the child finishes the tv-show.
  11. Then operator will ask the patient to choose from the face scale diagrams about his anxiety state at the end of the visit.

Intervention modifications:

In case the child interrupted the dental visit for questions or any reason, the last record of pulse oximeter will be repeated.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

42

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

5 years to 8 years (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Children aged 5-8 years old.
  • Children with decayed teeth requiring pulp therapy (excluding cases with acute pulpitis)
  • Cooperative children and potentially cooperative
  • Physically and mentally normal children.
  • No previous dental experience involving local anaesthetic administration for the last 2 years

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Children with visual impairment.
  • Children with hearing disabilities.
  • Children with disability complicating the dental treatment as trismus, or TMJ problems.
  • Children with highly inflamed pulp tissue inducing pain during dental visit.
  • Patients or caregivers who refuse to sign the consent.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Audio-Visual Distraction Group
In this arm, the patient will be introduced to the audio-visual distraction device and given some instruction on how to use it and rules while using it. other than that, the dental procedure is as same as the other arm group.
This device is a kind of head glass that obstructs the vision with a wide screen showing movies or photos. Earphones are extended from it and inserted in ears. so it obstructs the vision and audio of the surroundings.
No Intervention: Normal Dental Environment Group
Normal Dental Environment without any distractions.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Facial Image Scale
Time Frame: Immediately right after the dental visit.
To measure dental Anxiety by using Facial Image Scale
Immediately right after the dental visit.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Oxygen Saturation (using Pulse oximetry)
Time Frame: During the dental visit
to assess the amount of oxygen saturation and relate to the stress level.
During the dental visit

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Heart Rate (using Pulse oximetry)
Time Frame: During the dental visit
to asses heart beats per minute and relate it to the patient's anxiety
During the dental visit

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Mahmoud Hamdy, professor, Cairo University
  • Study Chair: Nada Wassef, Ass. Prof, Cairo University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Anticipated)

September 1, 2017

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

July 1, 2018

Study Completion (Anticipated)

September 1, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 23, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 24, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

July 25, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 25, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 24, 2017

Last Verified

July 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • Protocol CairoU

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Undecided

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Anxiety, Dental

Clinical Trials on Nibiru 3D Virtual Reality Headset

3
Subscribe