Goal Oriented Strategy to Preserve Ejection Fraction Trial (GOSPEL)

August 1, 2017 updated by: A. Vonk Noordegraaf, Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc

Raising the Bars in the Treatment of Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension: Goal Oriented Strategy to Preserve Ejection Fraction Trial

In this prospective long term feasibility study we examine whether a goal oriented therapeutic strategy that is able to preserve right ventricular function will result in improved clinical outcome in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension. We hypothesize that right ventricular function can only be preserved when early and aggressive medical combination therapy not only reduces pulmonary vascular resistance but also pulmonary pressures.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Rationale:

The current strategy in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH)is to improve exercise capacity which can be achieved by decreasing pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) and subsequently increasing cardiac output (CO). Despite this load reduction, a substantial proportion of patients show progressive right ventricular (RV) dysfunction leading to clinical worsening and death. A possible explanation is that current therapies show a relatively modest reduction in PVR, leaving mean pulmonary artery pressure (mPAP) unchanged. As a consequence RV work, defined as the product of CO and mPAP increases, contributing to progressive RV dysfunction.

Hypothesis:

A goal oriented therapeutic strategy that is able to preserve RV function will result in improved clinical outcome. RV function can only be preserved when early and aggressive combination therapy not only reduces PVR but also mPAP.

Study questions:

  1. Will a goal oriented strategy to preserve/improve RV function, measured by right ventricular ejection fraction (RVEF) be effective?
  2. Does early and aggressive combination therapy result in improved RV function and survival during long term follow-up?
  3. Does a strategy to preserve RVEF also translate into improvements of other clinically meaningful parameters?
  4. Can RVEF be replaced by more simple measures?
  5. Will a goal oriented strategy to improve RVEF also lead to improvement of myocardial performances and coupling of the RV to its load?

Study design and study population:

In this prospective longitudinal feasibility study, thirty newly diagnosed idiopathic or heritable PAH patients with New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class II or III will be included. Maintenance/improvement of RVEF will be our primary outcome parameter and therefore cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) will be performed at baseline and at 4, 8 , 12 and 24 months of follow-up. Six-minute walk testing (6MWT), quality of life questionnaires and blood sampling (NT-proBNP) will be performed at similar follow-up intervals. In addition, right heart catheterization (RHC) will be performed at baseline, after 4, 12 and 24 months of follow-up.

NYHA II patients will start with single agent medical treatment whereas patients with NYHA III will start on combination therapy (2 treatments). In case of a stable/improved RVEF during each follow-up measurement (defined as no decrease in RVEF >3% compared to previous measurement), the treatment strategy will remain unchanged. In case of decreased RVEF >3%, additional medical therapy will be added. Our hypothesis will prove to be correct when the additional medical treatment result in improved RVEF during the subsequent follow-up measurement.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

30

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Amsterdam, Netherlands, 1081 HV
        • VU University Medical Center, dept Pulmonary diseases

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 80 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Idiopathic or heritable pulmonary arterial hypertension
  • New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class II or III

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Other causes of pulmonary arterial hypertension (i.e. collagen vascular disease, congenital heart disease, chrono-thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension, pulmonary venous hypertension, left heart failure, hypoxemic lung disease)
  • Pulmonary arterial hypertension targeted therapies before study inclusion

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: NA
  • Interventional Model: SINGLE_GROUP
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
OTHER: Upfront combination therapy
Combination of an ERA and PDE-5I (Sildenafil, Tadalafil, Bosentan, Macitentan)
Combination of an ERA and PDE-5I (Sildenafil, Tadalafil, Bosentan, Macitentan)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in right ventricular ejection fraction
Time Frame: 4,12, 24 months of follow-up
The primary endpoint will be change in right ventricular ejection fraction (RVEF) during 2 years of follow-up.
4,12, 24 months of follow-up

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
pulmonary vascular resistance
Time Frame: 4,12, 24 months of follow-up
Change in pulmonary vascular resistance
4,12, 24 months of follow-up
mPAP
Time Frame: 4,12, 24 months of follow-up
Change in mPAP
4,12, 24 months of follow-up
Cardiac output in L/min (Thermodilution method)
Time Frame: 4,8, 12, 24 months of follow-up
Change in cardiac output
4,8, 12, 24 months of follow-up
Exercise capacity
Time Frame: 4,8, 12, 24 months of follow-up
Change in exercise capacity
4,8, 12, 24 months of follow-up
New York Heart Association functional class
Time Frame: 4,8, 12, 24 months of follow-up
Change in New York Heart Association functional class
4,8, 12, 24 months of follow-up

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
NT-proBNP
Time Frame: 4,8, 12, 24 months of follow-up
Change in NT-proBNP
4,8, 12, 24 months of follow-up
Quality of Life by SF-36 questionnaire
Time Frame: 4,8, 12, 24 months of follow-up
Change in Quality of Life
4,8, 12, 24 months of follow-up

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Anton Vonk Noordegraaf, MD, PhD, VU University Medical Center, department of pulmonary diseases

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

May 1, 2013

Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)

September 1, 2017

Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)

September 1, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 18, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 1, 2017

First Posted (ACTUAL)

August 2, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

August 2, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 1, 2017

Last Verified

July 1, 2017

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension

Clinical Trials on ERA and PDE-5I (Sildenafil, Tadalafil, Bosentan, Macitentan)

3
Subscribe